Table 5. Comparison of affect recognition studies using federated learning (FL) and privacy-preserving approaches.a.
| Study | Dataset | FL algorithm | Data split | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almadhor et al [39] | WESADb | FedAvgc+logistic regression | N/Ad | 86.82 |
| Fauzi et al [40] | WESAD | FedAvg+DNNe network | N/A | 85.75 |
| Can and Ersoy [15] | Private dataset | FedAvg+MLPf | N/A | 88.55 |
| Lee et al [29] | WESAD | FedAvg+MLP | LOOCVg | 75.00 |
| Our previous study [38] | WESAD | FedAvg+1 DCNNh+DPi | 5-fold CVj | 90.00 |
| This study | VERBIOk | FedAvg+1 DCNN+DP | 5-fold CV | 88.67 |
The table reports the main approaches have been applied for stress detection by using a physiological dataset.
WESAD: wearable stress and affect detection.
FedAvg: federated averaging.
N/A: not applicable.
DNN: deep neural network.
MLP: multilayer perceptron.
LOOCV: leave-one-out cross-validation.
DCNN: deep convolutional neural network.
DP: differential privacy.
CV: cross-validation.
VERBIO: virtual environment for real-time biometric interaction and observation.