Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 23;2024:2679180. doi: 10.1155/tswj/2679180

Table 2.

Mean ± S.E of soil pH, EC, SOC, total N, and available P on different cultivated land management practices and slope gradients in the Korekore Watershed.

Factors Attribute of factors pH EC (ds/m) SOC (%) Total N (%) Available P (ppm)
Land management practice M-SWC 6.8 ± 0.12 0.06 ± 0.007 2.02 ± 0.26a 0.12 ± 0.01a 4.69 ± 0.32a
W-SWC 6.6 ± 0.06 0.07 ± 0.008 1.46 ± 0.24b 0.08 ± 0.01b 3.11 ± 0.31b
p value 0.45 0.62 0.04 < 0.0001 0.003

Slope gradient 0%–15% 6.7 ± 0.01a 0.07 ± 0.006 1.59 ± 0.19b 0.10 ± 0.03 4.24 ± 0.53
15%–30% 6.7 ± 0.05a 0.06 ± 0.01 1.13 ± 0.14b 0.09 ± 0.03 3.19 ± 0.37
> 30% 6.6 ± 0.03b 0.07 ± 0.01 2.51 ± 0.32a 0.10 ± 0.02 4.28 ± 0.52
p value 0.008 0.76 0.001 0.06 0.09

LMP ∗ SG 0.26ns 0.24ns 0.79ns 0.20ns 0.74ns

CV (%) 1.2 35.7 29.2 9.94 22.6

Note: Means ± S.E. with different letters within a column are significantly different (p < 0.05) (Fisher's LSD). LMP ∗ SG interaction effect.

Abbreviations: CV = coefficient of variation; LMP = land management practice; M-SWC = managed with soil and water conservation; ns = nonsignificant; S.E. = standard error; SG = slope gradient; W-SWC = without SWC.