Table 6.
Evaluation of certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE).
| Certainty assessment | No. of patients | Effect | Certainty | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of studies | Study design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | PG | Placebo | Relative (95% CI) | Absolute (95% CI) | |
| RP Severity | |||||||||||
| 8 | Randomized trials | Very seriousa | Not seriousb | Not serious | Not serious | None | 491 | 435 | — | MD 0.18 lower (0.37 lower to 0.01 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Lowa,b |
| RP Frequency | |||||||||||
| 6 | Randomized trials | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | None | 329 | 302 | — | MD 0.32 lower (0.76 lower to 0.13 higher) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderatec |
| RP Duration | |||||||||||
| 5 | Randomized trials | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | Seriousd | None | 275 | 243 | — | MD 4.79 lower (14.69 lower to 5.12 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Lowc,d |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference.
aTwo studies with high risk of bias.
bModerate heterogeneity.
cOverall allocation concerns and high risk of selective reporting.
dWide confidence interval.