Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 23;2024:1682081. doi: 10.1155/ijr/1682081

Table 6.

Evaluation of certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE).

Certainty assessment No. of patients Effect Certainty
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations PG Placebo Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
RP Severity
8 Randomized trials Very seriousa Not seriousb Not serious Not serious None 491 435 MD 0.18 lower (0.37 lower to 0.01 higher) ⨁⨁◯◯ Lowa,b
RP Frequency
6 Randomized trials Seriousc Not serious Not serious Not serious None 329 302 MD 0.32 lower (0.76 lower to 0.13 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderatec
RP Duration
5 Randomized trials Seriousc Not serious Not serious Seriousd None 275 243 MD 4.79 lower (14.69 lower to 5.12 higher) ⨁⨁◯◯ Lowc,d

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference.

aTwo studies with high risk of bias.

bModerate heterogeneity.

cOverall allocation concerns and high risk of selective reporting.

dWide confidence interval.