Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 11;9(4):295–307. doi: 10.14744/eej.2024.93723

TABLE 2.

Subgroup analysis based on the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors

Prognostic factors No. of study Sample size Pooled success rate (%) [95% CI] Weight (%) Q test p-value I square (%)
Preoperative factors
  Age 0.27 86.99
    <20 years 7 287 91 (79-98) 26.31 87.46
    21-40 years 10 1,691 80 (71-87) 37.88 87.26
    >40 years 8 427 82 (76-87) 35.81 80.13
  Tooth type 0.06* 83.24
    Anterior teeth 6 244 78 (70-86) 30.86 87.21
    Posterior teeth 15 1,387 87 (82-91) 69.14 81.58
  Pulpal status 0.11 87.43
    Asymptomatic# 17 2,396 91 (84-96) 89.81 88.14
    Symptomatic 2 56 84 (79-89) 10.19 -
  Periapical status 0.56 87.95
    Normal 17 2,450 84 (79-89) 81.27 89.64
    Uncertain## 4 268 87 (78-94) 18.73 72.06
  Root development 0.55 89.32
    Open apex 4 118 88 (62-100) 35.33 93.15
    Close apex 7 376 80 (69-90) 64.67 85.70
  Cause of exposure <0.01* 89.06
    Caries 18 1,269 85 (79-90) 77.95 86.56
    Non-caries 5 520 79 (61-92) 22.05 94.49
Intraoperative factors
  Rubber dam isolation (throughout all procedures) 0.01* 88.18
    Yes 16 1,170 88 (83-92) 61.46 81.04
    No 10 2,003 74 (64-82) 38.54 92.49
  Location of exposure 0.59 63.09
    Occlusal surface 9 453 83 (79-87) 51.43 57.21
    Axial surface 8 409 85 (80-90) 48.57 71.37
  Size of exposure 0.99 88.18
    <1 mm 7 1,596 86 (78-93) 77.35 90.03
    >1 mm 2 54 86 (81-91) 22.65 -
  Controlled bleeding time 0.12 90.97
    <5 min 4 508 90 (82-96) 46.95 81.43
    5-10 min 5 363 74 (50-93) 53.05 93.74
  Haemostatic agents <0.01* 88.89
    NaOCl 11 653 85 (78-91) 52.70 82.28
    Non-NaOCl 8 820 82 (71-92) 38.06 91.72
    None 2 93 55 (45-65) 9.24 -
  Haemostatic method 0.04* 83.01
    Pressing with soaked cotton 13 1,431 86 (81-91) 61.15 86.34
    Pressing with dry cotton 2 1,121 80 (77-82) 10.6 -
    Irrigation & cotton pressing 6 475 86 (80-92) 28.25 68.66
  Pulp capping material 0.01* 85.19
    Calcium hydroxide 11 1,916 76 (70-82) 39.52 89.49
    Calcium-silicate based material 19 1,179 86 (82-90) 60.48 80.59
  Liner or base 0.23 88.18
    Yes 17 1,763 85 (80-89) 66.83 83.33
    No 9 1,410 78 (65-89) 33.17 92.74
  Restorative material 0.34 86.98
    Amalgam 4 109 89 (81-95) 17.66 64.65
    Resin composite 29 1,117 84 (78-90) 82.34 88.61
  Timing of restoration 0.201 89.38
    Immediate 8 1,625 79 (69-87) 37.96 91.20
    Delayed <3 weeks 9 498 88 (81-93) 39.88 75.59
    Delayed >3 weeks 5 317 78 (54-94) 22.17 94.75
Use of magnification <0.01* 88.18
    Yes 4 244 93 (90-96) 15.58 -
    No 2 2,929 81 (76-86) 84.42 88.23
  Treatment provider 0.39 89.63
    Undergraduate student 4 547 73 (57-87) 24.33 93.13
    Postgraduate student 4 355 87 (78-93) 23.39 75.94
    General practitioner 5 614 81 (73-87) 30.62 80.63
    Specialist dentist 4 298 75 (46-96) 21.65 95.70
Postoperative factor 0.60 88.26
  Recall period
    6 months-1 year 9 511 80 (64-92) 34.18 92.63
    Over 1 year-2 years 6 585 87 (81-91) 23.6 51.43
    Over 2 years-3 years 3 136 76 (53-93) 12.15 -
    Over 3 years 7 1,845 86 (77-92) 30.07 89.43
#

: Presence of short-lived thermal sensation or absence of symptoms; ##: No radiographic information was described; *: Q test p-value<0.10 was considered as evidence of significant heterogeneity. CI: Confidence interval; NaOCl: Sodium hypochlorite