Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 30;14:32033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83704-w

Table 3.

Effects of dietary NaB on growth performance of juvenile turbot.

Diet Control High SBM High SBM + 0.2%NaB High SBM + 0.5%NaB
Survival (%) 97.50 ± 1.44 93.33 ± 0.83 95.83 ± 0.83 92.50 ± 3.82
Final weight (g) 76.34 ± 1.54b 65.83 ± 1.44a 76.00 ± 2.08b 73.83 ± 2.20b
Weight gain rate (%) 247.00 ± 7.00b 199.20 ± 6.57a 245.45 ± 9.46b 235.61 ± 10.02b
Specific growth rate (%/d) 2.22 ± 0.04b 1.96 ± 0.04a 2.21 ± 0.05b 2.16 ± 0.05b
Feed efficiency ratio 1.14 ± 0.03 1.05 ± 0.02 1.07 ± 0.02 1.08 ± 0.03
Feed intake (%) 1.73 ± 0.03 1.69 ± 0.03 1.84 ± 0.05 1.79 ± 0.06
Hepatosomatic index (%) 1.34 ± 0.07 1.33 ± 0.06 1.46 ± 0.05 1.41 ± 0.04

Survival (%) = 100 × (the final number of fish/the initial number of fish); Weight gain rate (WGR, %) = 100 × (final body weight-initial body weight) /initial body weight; Specific growth rate (SGR, %/d) = 100 × (Ln final body weight—Ln initial body weight)/days; Feed efficiency ratio, FER = weight gain (g)/total amount of feed consumption (g); Feed intake, FI (%BW/day) = 100 × feed consumption/(final body weight + initial body weight)/2)/day; Hepatosomatic index (HSI, %) = 100 × liver weight (g) of final individual fish/final individual weight (g).

*Values were presented as means ± SEM (n = 3 replicates). Multiple comparisons were conducted with Tukey’s test. And values in the same row with different letters were significantly different (P < 0.05).