Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 30;14:31878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83415-2

Table 5.

The predictors of MMG performance.

Variables COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P-value
Age 1.309 (1.137–1.507) < 0.001** 1.418 (1.116–1.801) 0.004*
Income 1.002 (1.000–1.003) 0.031** 1.001(0.999–1.003) 0.280
Marital status
Married 1.231 (0.251–6.032) 0.798
Single 1.00 (ref)
Education
Undergraduate and diploma 0.242 (0.057–1.031) 0.055** 0.397 (0.041–3.821) 0.424
Postgraduate 1.00 (ref)
Family history
Yes 2.000 (0.489–8.182) 0.335
No 1.00 (ref)
Knowledge 1.375 (1.167–1.620) < 0.001** 1.478 (1.144–1.910) 0.003*
CHBMS subscale
Susceptibility 1.135 (0.921–1.399) 0.233
Seriousness 1.076 (0.929–1.246) 0.327
Benefit of MMG 1.133 (0.979–1.311) 0.093** 0.892 (0.663–1.201) 0.453
Barriers of MMG 0.639 (0.460–0.887) 0.008** 0.524 (0.263–1.043) 0.066
Motivation 1.063 (0.904–1.250) 0.459

*Significant for multiple logistic regression model (p < 0.05), ** Significant for simple logistic regression model (p ≤ 0.25). COR, Crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; Assumptions of logistic regression have been met and the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated good fit (X2 = 12.0, p = 0.150); Negelkerke R2 = 0.223, variance inflation factors (VIF) are less than five for all variables included in this model.