Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 30;56:79. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00944-0

Table 1.

Percentage of individuals for each marker that do not follow the assumption that genotype is homozygous in females and heterozygous in males (error rate) by dataset

Marker Sim 5a,b Sim 50 Sim rand Sim real Real data
AX-89953234 5 50 23 9 51
AX-89955231 5 50 16 6 27
AX-89970231 5 50 36 5 44
AX-89928458 5 50 17 7 47
AX-89941119 5 50 9 8 5
AX-89958463 5 50 26 28 30
AX-89968299 5 50 27 24 9
AX-89924652 5 50 21 54 18
AX-89960682 5 50 22 27 17
AX-89936452 5 50 33 39 48
AX-89947083 5 50 8 25 54
AX-89955288 5 50 13 38 38
AX-89950690 5 50 44 32 53
AX-89926028 5 50 29 37 28
AX-89963605 5 50 14 55 47

aError rate computed as SNPError/(SNPTotal − SNPMissing) * 100, where SNPError is the number of erroneous SNP samples, SNPTotal is the total number of SNP samples, and SNPMissing is the number of missing SNP samples. The average proportions of SNPMissing were 5% and 6% in the simulated and real data, respectively

bSim 5 = simulated data with a 5% missing rate for all SNPs; Sim 50 = simulated data with a 50% missing rate for all SNPs; Sim rand = simulated data with a random error rate in the range of 5 to 50%; Sim real = simulated data with a random error rate in the range of 5 to 10% for 5 SNPs and 10 to 50% for 10 SNPs; real data = data from the Finnish Rainbow Trout Breeding Program