Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 30;24:1560. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06397-9

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in this network meta-analysis

Reference Region Sample size Age (year) Sex (M/F) Subjects Duration
(month)
Interventions Outcomes
T C T C T C T C
Xu et al. 2016 [18] Zhejiang 40 40 20.50 ± 2.30 20.70 ± 1.90 24/16 26/14 interns 13 CBL LBL ①②
Zhang et al. 2018 [19] Beijing 50 50 27.77 ± 2.22 27.72 ± 2.12 30/20 29/21 interns 15 CBL LBL ①②
Ma et al. 2018 [4] Xinjiang 120 120 - - 73/47 72/48 interns - CBL LBL ①②
Dong et al. 2018 [20] Jiangsu 25 25 26.07 ± 1.03 26.11 ± 0.97 5/20 6/19 residents 13 CBL LBL ①②
Tang et al. 2019 [21] Chongqing 24 24 25.87 ± 1.22 25.69 ± 1.17 9/15 10/14 residents 12 CBL LBL ①②
Peng et al. 2021 [22] Hunan 21 21 22.49 ± 1.59 22.40 ± 1.61 10/11 9/12 interns 13 CBL LBL ①②
Li et al. 2021 [23] Jiangsu 23 23 21.31 ± 0.57 24.44 ± 0.63 10/13 8/15 interns 13 CBL LBL ①②
Yang et al. 2022 [24] Sichuan 30 30 25.10 ± 1.09 25.13 ± 1.17 15/15 16/14 interns 12 CBL LBL
Zhou et al. 2019 [25] Shanghai 20 20 - - - - interns 26 CP LBL ①②
Hou et al. 2022 [26] Guangdong 20 20 24.18 ± 0.54 24.31 ± 0.53 9/11 10/10 residents 61 CP LBL ①②
Li et al. 2012 [27] Henan 20 20 - - - - interns 6 EBM LBL ①②
Jiang et al. 2017 [28] Jiangsu 31 31 - - - - residents 36 EBM LBL ①  
Jiang et al. 2020 [29] Hubei 40 40 21.84 ± 1.13 21.23 ± 1.11 21/19 22/18 interns 13 EBM LBL ①②
Zhang et al. 2019 [30] Henan 42 43 21.90 ± 0.80 21.80 ± 0.70 20/22 22/21 interns 10 FCM LBL ①②
Chen et al. 2020 [31] Guizhou 30 30 - - - - interns 12 FCM LBL ①②
Wang et al. 2021 [32] Neimenggu 15 15 28.60 ± 1.30 28.50 ± 1.40 8/7 9/6 residents 18 FCM LBL ①②
Zhu et al. 2022 [33] Anhui 21 21 24.76 ± 0.29 24.81 ± 0.31 11/17 13/18 residents 4 FCM LBL ①②
Zhao Ting. 2014 [34] Henan 30 30 19.31 ± 1.02 19.05 ± 0.97 16/14 12/18 interns 6 PBL LBL
Cai et al. 2017 [5] Guizhou 25 25 24.30 ± 2.70 24.20 ± 1.20 5/20 3/22 residents - PBL LBL ①②
Liu et al. 2017 [35] Anhui 30 30 22.20 ± 1.51 22.90 ± 1.65 12/18 16/14 interns 10 PBL LBL ①②
Li et al. 2017 [36] Xinjiang 40 40 - - - - interns 12 PBL LBL ①②
Long et al. 2018 [6] Ningxia 26 26 22.63 ± 1.03 22.94 ± 1.05 11/15 10/16 interns 9 PBL LBL ①②
Zhang et al. 2018 [37] Liaoning 21 21 21.90 ± 1.20 22.50 ± 1.60 7/14 6/15 interns 18 PBL LBL ①②
Zhao et al. 2018 [38] Neimenggu 50 50 - - - - interns 33 PBL LBL ①②
Ma et al. 2019 [39] Fujian 23 23 23.38 ± 1.06 23.25 ± 1.03 8/15 9/14 interns 33 PBL LBL ①②
Hu et al. 2019 [40] Anhui 30 30 21.2 ± 0.41 21.27 ± 0.45 16/14 15/15 interns 10 PBL LBL ①②
Rong et al. 2021 [41] Anhui 20 20 25.46 ± 1.04 25.42 ± 1.02 5/15 6/14 interns 12 PBL LBL ①②
Lei et al. 2016 [42] Xinjiang 47 46 21.4 21.3 25/22 24/22 interns 6 TBL LBL
Yin et al. 2019 [43] Neimenggu 15 15 - - - - residents 13 TBL LBL
Fan et al. 2020 [44] Shanxi 33 33 22.27 ± 0.81 22.47 ± 0.76 14/19 15/18 interns 10 TBL LBL ①②
Zhang et al. 2022 [45] Liaoning 100 100 23.76 ± 0.88 23.72 ± 0.89 56/44 57/43 interns 5 TBL LBL ①②

Age is described as the mean ± standard deviation. F, female; M, male; T, test group; C, control group. PBL, problem-based learning; CBL, case-based learning; EBM, evidence-based medicine; FCM, flipped classroom model; TBL, team-based learning; CP, clinical pathway; LBL, lecture-based learning. ① the theoretical exam scores; ② the practical skill scores