Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0316668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316668

Seroprevalence and associated factors of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C infections among sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand during easing of COVID-19 lockdown measures

Sayamon Hongjaisee 1,*, Woottichai Khamduang 2,3,4, Nang Kham-Kjing 2,3, Nicole Ngo-Giang-Huong 3,4,5, Arunrat Tangmunkongvorakul 1
Editor: Yury E Khudyakov6
PMCID: PMC11687872  PMID: 39739911

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, sex workers (SW) were one of the vulnerable groups affected by lockdown measures. COVID-19 had also disrupted HIV/Sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and treatment services for sex workers due to numerous restrictions in specialist medical care. This study aims to assess the seroprevalence of HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV and associated factors among SW as COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. The SW aged over 18 years residing in Chiangmai, Thailand, were recruited between March and December 2022. An interview-based questionnaire was administered. Blood was collected for HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV serological testing. Logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with these serological markers. Of 264 SW recruited, 52.3% were male. The median age was 31 years. Male sex workers (MSW) had higher seroprevalence of HIV (13% vs. 4.8%), syphilis (23.9% vs. 6.4%) and HCV (6.5% vs. 2.4%). Female sex workers (FSW) had higher seroprevalence of HBsAg (9.5% vs. 4.4%). A high proportion were unaware of their HIV/STI infection. MSW reporting receptive anal sex were more likely to be HIV and Treponema Ab positive. MSW reporting drug injection history were more likely to be HCV Ab positive. FSW reporting younger age at first sex were more likely to be HIV Ab positive. In conclusion, SW remains particularly affected by HIV/STIs. Despite the lockdown, HIV/STIs continued to spread, highlighting the need to provide access to HIV/STIs testing, prevention, and treatment services for this population, particularly young men.

Introduction

Sex workers are considered to be at high risk of acquiring and transmitting sexually transmitted infections (STIs) to their clients due to their high number of sexual partners and the high frequency of unprotected sex intercourses. The most recent estimate of the number of sex workers in Thailand is 144,000, although this is an underestimate as sex work is illegal in the country [1]. Thailand has implemented national STIs prevention policies targeting vulnerable groups, including sex workers. The Ministry of Public Health’s guidelines recommend routine STIs screenings every three months and accessible treatment services at low or no cost. Collaborations with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community groups promote condom use, distribute preventive supplies, and raise STIs awareness within the sex worker community.

A previous study in Thailand during 2017–2019 showed that, among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) engaged in sex work, 5% were HIV Ab positive and 14% were positive for syphilis Ab [2]. An observational study conducted among MSM and TGW sex workers in Chiangmai during that period showed that 2.2% tested HIV positive [3]. Furthermore, a study conducted among migrant sex workers in Chiangmai in 2019 showed an overall prevalence of 2.3%, 3.0%, and 2.3% for HIV, syphilis, and HCV Ab respectively and 11.4% for HBsAg [46].

In January 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared as a global public health emergency by the World Health Organization (WHO). This outbreak had a tremendous impact on the health system, social life, economy, and security of many countries. In early April 2020, the Thai government declared a state of emergency and imposed a curfew with travel and movement restrictions. A nationwide lockdown was also implemented in April-May 2020 to control the COVID-19 outbreak. Although these measures provided relief, the COVID-19 outbreak continued and lockdown measures were still in place in some provinces. COVID-19 clusters were also reported in several nightclubs in Bangkok and Chiangmai in March 2021. Emergency orders to close night entertainment venues including pubs, bars, clubs, and karaoke were still in place in June 2022.

Sex workers were one of the most vulnerable groups affected by these measures. Most had become unemployed and lost their incomes as the consequence of the lockdown and confinement measures. COVID-19 had also disrupted HIV/STI testing and treatment services for sex workers due to numerous restrictions on specialist medical care. A study of seven STI clinics in Thailand found that the number of sex workers presenting for STIs screening was drastically reduced (90%) (Department of Diseases Control, Ministry of Public Health). A previous report from Spain found that the number of reported STI cases since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic was 51% lower than expected, reaching an average of 56% during the lockdown period with a maximum reduction of 72% for chlamydia and a minimum of 22% for syphilis [7]. Another study in the US also showed evidence of significant and sustained reductions in sexual risk behaviors (number of sex partners, any substance use, and STI testing) during the pandemic [8]. The data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) surveillance 2020 showed that the reported STDs cases drastically dropped nationally during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. However, by the end of the year, reported cases of gonorrhoea, syphilis, and congenital syphilis surpassed their 2019 levels, indicating a continued increase in STDs [9].

During the COVID-19 pandemic response, access to HIV/ STI services was disrupted. It is unclear whether the decline in reported STI prevalence in different contexts was due to a decrease in testing or to reduced exposure or reduced sexual risk behaviors. We therefore assessed the seroprevalence of HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV among sex workers, in Chiangmai, Thailand as the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures were gradually lifted. We also examined the factors associated with these four infections.

Materials and methods

Study populations

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Chiangmai, Thailand, from 1 March to 31 December 2022. In this period, lockdown and confinement measures were being lifted, but night entertainment venues were still closed until June 2022. The study included men or women who were (1) aged at least 18 years; (2) Thai or migrants; (3) sexually active with sexual partners in the past 12 months; (4) working in the entertainment venues or as freelance sex workers; (5) currently living or working in Chiangmai; (6) able to provide written informed consent. MSM, TGW, and female sex workers visiting non-governmental organization STI clinic, M Plus Foundation, were invited to participate.

Ethical statement

The study was approved by the Human Experimentation Committee, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University (Certificate of Ethical approval No. 32/2021 and No.40/2022). All participants were informed about the study and gave written informed consent. All parts of the study were kept confidential, and all participants data and laboratory results were de-identified.

Data collection and blood collection

Participant information was collected using a questionnaire administered during a face-to-face interview by the research team and staffs from the M Plus Foundation and the Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Chiangmai, who work with sex workers and provide sexual health services in Chiangmai. Data collected included socio-demographic characteristics, health-risk behaviors, medical history, and sexual behaviors using REDCap® application. After the interview, six milliliters of peripheral blood were collected and transferred to the laboratory for processing. Plasma was separated and kept frozen at -70°C until testing for HIV, syphilis, and HCV serology and HBsAg.

HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV serology testing

Plasma samples were tested with rapid immunochromatographic diagnostic tests for the detection of HIV antibodies (Determine HIV-1/2 test, Abbott Diagnostics, 100% sensitivity and 99.75% specificity), antibodies to Treponema pallidum (Determine Syphilis TP test, Abbott Diagnostics, 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity), HBsAg (Determine HBsAg 2 test, Abbott Diagnostics, 98.4% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity), and HCV antibodies (SD BIOLINE HCV, 99.3–100% sensitivity and 98.1–100% specificity). The test procedures and the interpretation of the result were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All participants received an HIV test regardless of whether they already knew their HIV status.

Laboratory test results were provided to participants through the M Plus clinic. Participants testing positive for HIV and syphilis Ab were referred to the M Plus Clinic or the Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Chiangmai, for care and treatment services according to the national guidelines. Those testing positive for HBsAg, or anti-HCV received information on the prevention and management of HBV and HCV infection and were encouraged to attend the health center of their choice for clinical care.

Data analysis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages and continuous variables are described using the median with interquartile range (IQR). The comparison of characteristics between males and females was conducted using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the potential association between variables (sociodemographic, health behavior, medical history, and sexual behavior) and the outcomes (HIV, syphilis, HBV, or HCV infection).

The analysis of each infection was computed independently. Variables significant in the univariable analysis with a p-value of <0.250 were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. A cutoff value of 0.250 is supported by previous study [10]. Variables that were not statistically significant with a p-value of >0.250 were removed from the model using a forward selection method, starting with no variables and adding them one by one, beginning with the one most correlated with the outcome. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as indicators of the strength of association. All data analyses were performed using Stata version 16.0 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

A total of 264 sex workers participated in this study. Their socio-demographic characteristics and behaviors are presented in Table 1. Approximately half (52.3%) were male. Their median age was 31 years (IQR: 25–38) overall, 27 years for men and 35.5 years for women. Most were Thai (73.5%). About 20.1% were currently living with a partner and about 70% of women had children. The median age at first sex was 17 years (IQR: 15–18). Regarding sexual behaviors, 86.2% of men reported being bisexual and 91.3% of women heterosexual. The median duration of sex work was 4 years (IQR: 2–8). Condom use was common with clients (75.6%), but not with partners (19.5%). The majority, 84.8% had a drinking habit, 48.9% had smoked and 20.8% had used recreational drug in the last 3 months. Only 16 (6.1%) had ever injected drugs. Most participants (86.4%) reported having been tested for HIV and 44.5% having been diagnosed with a genital infection (gonorrhoea, or non-gonorrhea, or syphilis, or Herpes). The majority, 85.2%, reported having body piercing or tattoos, and 40.5% reported having shared sharp objects with others.

Table 1. Characteristics of sex workers 2022 (N = 264).

Characteristics Total (%) Male (%) Female (%) p-value*
Sociodemographic characteristics
Sex at birth 264 138 (52.3) 126 (47.7)
Age (years) Median 31 (IQR: 25–38) 27 (IQR: 22–32) 35.5 (IQR: 31–41) <0.001
Ethnicity Thai 194 (73.5) 89 (64.5) 105 (83.3) 0.001
Non-Thai 70 (26.5) 49 (35.5) 21 (16.7)
Education level Lower than University/college 203 (76.9) 107 (77.5) 96 (76.2) 0.498
University/college 24 (9.1) 10 (7.3) 14 (11.1)
None 37 (14.0) 21 (15.2) 16 (12.7)
Marital status Single 180 (68.2) 98 (71.0) 82 (65.1) 0.137
Currently have a partner 53 (20.1) 29 (21.0) 24 (19.0)
Separated/ Divorced/ Widowed 31 (11.7) 11 (8.0) 20 (15.9)
Have children 127 (48.1) 39 (28.3) 88 (69.8) <0.001
Monthly income (USD) Median 437 (IQR: 291–729) 350 (IQR: 291–583) 583 (IQR: 291–874) <0.001
Workplace Pub/Bar/ Restaurants/ Rural road-side bar/ Cafe 76 (28.8) 46 (33.3) 30 (23.8) 0.088
Traditional massage/ Spa/Sauna 73 (27.7) 37 (26.8) 36 (28.6) 0.749
Massage parlor 44 (16.7) 11 (8.0) 33 (26.2) <0.001
Karaoke 37 (14.0) 15 (10.9) 22 (17.5) 0.123
Others 91 (34.5) 57 (41.3) 34 (27.0) 0.014
Sexual behaviors
Age at first sexual intercourse (years) Median 17 (IQR: 15–18) 16 (IQR: 14–18) 17 (IQR: 15–19) <0.001
Sexual orientation Bisexual 129 (48.9) 119 (86.2) 10 (7.9) <0.001
Heterosexual 119 (45.1) 4 (2.9) 115 (91.3)
Homosexual 16 (6.0) 15 (10.9) 1 (0.8)
Duration in sex work (years) Median 4 (IQR: 2–8) 3 (IQR: 1–6) 5 (IQR: 2–10) <0.001
Sexual activities (can answer >1) Vaginal sex 248 (93.9) 123 (89.1) 125 (99.2) 0.001
Insertive anal sex 135 (51.1) 133 (96.4) 2 (1.6) <0.001
Receptive anal sex 50 (19.0) 31 (22.5) 19 (15.2) 0.188
Oral sex 227 (86.0) 118 (85.5) 109 (86.5) 0.815
Sex toys 51 (19.3) 29 (21.0) 22 (17.5) 0.465
Number of sexual partners per day, in the past 3 months (persons) Median 1 (IQR: 1–2) 1 (IQR: 1–1) 1 (IQR: 1–3) <0.001
Condom use with partners, in the past month (N = 118) All the time 23 (19.5) 7 (10.9) 16 (29.6) 0.011
Occasionally or never 95 (80.5) 57 (89.1) 38 (70.4)
Condom use with clients, in the past month (N = 246) All the time 186 (75.6) 83 (67.0) 103 (84.4) 0.001
Occasionally or never 60 (24.4) 41 (33.0) 19 (15.6)
Behavior characteristics
Smoking 129 (48.9) 93 (67.4) 36 (28.6) <0.001
Drinking alcohol 224 (84.8) 118 (85.5) 106 (84.1) 0.755
Recreational drug used, in the past 3 months 55 (20.8) 42 (30.4) 13 (10.3) <0.001
Ever used drug injection 16 (6.1) 15 (10.9) 1 (0.8) 0.001
Medical history
Ever tested for HIV 228 (86.4) 113 (81.9) 115 (91.3) 0.026
HIV results (N = 228) Positive 14 (6.1) 11 (9.7) 3 (2.6) 0.069
Negative 209 (91.7) 99 (87.6) 110 (95.7)
Do not know 5 (2.2) 3 (2.7) 2 (1.7)
Ever been diagnosed with Jaundice 3 (1.1) 2 (1.5) 1 (0.8) 0.882
Liver diseases 16 (6.1) 7 (5.1) 9 (7.1) 0.233
Hepatitis B 12 (4.6) 4 (2.9) 8 (6.4) 0.063
Hepatitis C 3 (1.1) 2 (1.5) 1 (0.8) 0.306
Genital infection (Gonorrhea, or Non-gonorrhea, or syphilis, or Herpes) 109 (44.5) 88 (66.7) 21 (18.6) <0.001
Ever had Surgery or blood transfusion 79 (30.2) 38 (27.7) 41 (32.8) 0.372
needle sticked 14 (5.3) 11 (8.0) 3 (2.4) 0.129
Ever received HB vaccine 23 (8.7) 8 (5.8) 15 (11.9) 0.188
Other behaviors
Ever shared sharp objects with others 107 (40.5) 65 (47.1) 42 (33.3) 0.023
Tattoo or body piercing 225 (85.2) 114 (82.6) 111 (88.1) 0.210
Shaving in barbers (only males) 68 (49.3)
Circumcision (only males) 8 (5.8)

*p-values referred to the comparison of characteristics between males and females.

Seroprevalence of HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV

Of the 264 participants, 24 (9.1%) tested HIV Ab positive (Table 2). HIV seroprevalence was statistically higher in men than in women (13.0% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.019). Based on the questionnaire on previous HIV testing or knowledge of HIV status, seven men and three women were considered as newly diagnosed with HIV infection. Forty-one (15.5% of 264) sex workers tested syphilis Ab positive with a higher seroprevalence in men than in women (23.9% vs. 6.4%, p<0.001). Among them, 19 of 41 were newly diagnosed. Eighteen (6.8% of 264) tested positive for HBsAg (4.4% in men and 9.5% in women). Among 18 HBsAg positive cases, 11 were newly diagnosed. Twelve (4.6% of 264) were positive for HCV Ab (6.5% in men and 2.4% in women), 9 of 12 were newly diagnosed.

Table 2. Seroprevalence of HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV among sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand (N = 264).

Sexually Transmitted Infections Total (N = 264) Male (N = 138) Female (N = 126) P-value *
n (%) 95%CI n (%) 95%CI n (%) 95%CI
HIV Ab 24 (9.1) 6.2–13.2 18 (13.0) 8.3–19.8 6 (4.8) 2.1–10.3 0.019
Treponema pallidum Ab 41 (15.5) 11.6–20.4 33 (23.9) 17.5–31.8 8 (6.4) 3.2–12.3 <0.001
HBsAg 18 (6.8) 4.3–10.6 6 (4.4) 1.9–9.4 12 (9.5) 5.5–16.1 0.096
HCV Ab 12 (4.6) 2.6–7.9 9 (6.5) 3.4–12.1 3 (2.4) 0.8–7.2 0.107

*p-values referred to the comparison of seroprevalence between males and females.

HIV syphilis co-infection was found in 13 (4.9%) participants, including 12 men and one woman (8.7% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.003). Four (1.5%) of the participants were co-infected with both HIV and HCV.

Factors associated with HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV infection

Among male sex workers

Univariable analysis of variables associated with HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV prevalence among male sex workers are shown in S1S4 Tables. Variables significant in the univariable analysis (p<0.250) were included in the multivariable analysis.

Multivariable analysis showed that positive HIV Ab was associated with receptive anal sex (OR = 3.68, 95%CI = 1.17–11.55, p = 0.026), Table 3. Positive Treponema Ab was associated with receptive anal sex (OR = 15.49, 95%CI = 4.31–55.65, p<0.001) and recreational drug used in the last 3 months (OR = 4.04, 95%CI = 1.33–12.27, p = 0.014). HBsAg positivity was significantly associated with sexual identity (OR = 0.05, 95%CI = 0–0.53, p = 0.012). HCV Ab positivity was associated with aged over 27 years (OR = 15.12, 95%CI = 1.31–174.24, p = 0.029), recreational drug used in the last 3 months (OR = 11.99, 95%CI = 1.67–86.12, p = 0.014), and ever having injected drugs (OR = 21.89, 95%CI = 3.45–138.79, p = 0.001).

Table 3. Factors associated with HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV infections among male sex workers.
Characteristics Male
n/N (%) Univariable Multivariable
OR (95%CI) p-value OR (95%CI) p-value
HIV Ab positivity
Ever had surgery or blood transfusion No 16/99 (16.2) 1.00
Yes 2/38 (5.3) 0.29 (0.06–1.32) 0.109 N.S.
Ever visited a community barber for shaving (males) No 5/70 (7.1) 1.00
Yes 13/68 (19.1) 3.07 (1.03–9.16) 0.044 N.S.
Duration in sex work < 2 years 2/50 (4.0) 1.00 1.00
> 2 years 16/88 (18.2) 5.33 (1.17–24.26) 0.030 3.97 (0.83–19.02) 0.084
Receptive anal sex No 10/107 (9.4) 1.00 1.00
Yes 8/31 (25.8) 3.37 (1.20–9.50) 0.021 3.68 (1.17–11.55) 0.026
Condom use with clients, in the past month All the time 8/83 (9.6) 1.00 1.00
Never or occasionally 9/41 (22.0) 2.64 (0.93–7.45) 0.067 2.81 (0.92–8.56) 0.069
Treponema pallidum Ab positivity
Age (years) ≤ median age (27) 21/75 (28.0) 1.00 1.00
> median age (27) 12/63 (19.1) 0.61 (0.27–1.35) 0.222 0.40 (0.13–1.29) 0.126
Recreational drug used, in the past 3 months No 18/96 (18.8) 1.00 1.00
Yes 15/42 (35.7) 2.41 (1.07–5.43) 0.034 4.04 (1.33–12.27) 0.014
Ever been diagnosed with genital infections No 5/44 (11.4) 1.00 1.00
Yes 27/88 (30.7) 3.45 (1.23–9.72) 0.019 3.28 (0.86–12.54) 0.083
Age at first sexual intercourse < 15 years old 16/43 (37.2) 1.00 1.00
> 15 years old 17/95 (17.9) 0.37 (0.16–0.83) 0.016 0.37 (0.13–1.08) 0.069
Receptive anal sex No 18/107 (16.8) 1.00 1.00
Yes 15/31 (48.4) 4.64 (1.95–11.04) 0.001 15.49 (4.31–55.65) <0.001
HBsAg positivity
Race Non-Thai 5/49 (10.2) 1.00 1.00
Thai 1/89 (1.1) 0.1 (0.01–0.88) 0.038 0.14 (0.01–1.35) 0.089
Sexual orientation Heterosexual 2/4 (50.0) 1.00 1.00
Homosexual 0/15 N/A N/A
Bisexual 4/119 (3.4) 0.03 (0–0.31) 0.003 0.05 (0–0.53) 0.012
HCV Ab positivity
Age (years) ≤ median age (27) 1/75 (1.4) 1.00 1.00
> median age (27) 8/63 (12.7) 10.76 (1.31–88.60) 0.027 15.12 (1.31–174.24) 0.029
Recreational drug used, in the past 3 months No 2/96 (2.1) 1.00 1.00
Yes 7/42 (16.7) 9.40 (1.86–47.44) 0.007 11.99 (1.67–86.12) 0.014
Ever used drug injection No 3/123 (2.4) 1.00 1.00
Yes 6/15 (40.0) 26.67 (5.70–124.71) <0.001 21.89 (3.45–138.79) 0.001

Among female sex workers

Univariable analysis of variables associated with HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV positivity among female sex workers are shown in S5S8 Tables. Variables significant in the univariable analysis (p<0.250) were included in the multivariable analysis.

Multivariable analysis showed that positive HIV Ab was associated with younger age at first sex (Table 4) as compared to having first sex at older age (OR = 0.08, 95%CI = 0.01–0.59, p = 0.013) and with the use of sex toys (OR = 7.37, 95%CI = 1.00–53.85, p = 0.049). Positive treponema Ab was associated with smoking (OR = 8.86, 95%CI = 1.59–49.26, p = 0.013), and receptive anal sex (OR = 14.51, 95% CI = 1.88–111.76, p = 0.010). HBsAg positivity was significantly associated with marital status (OR = 4.37, 95%CI = 1.20–15.60, p = 0.025). No factors were found associated with HCV Ab positivity.

Table 4. Factors associated with HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV infections among female sex workers.
Characteristics Female
n/N (%) Univariable Multivariable
OR (95%CI) p-value OR (95%CI) p-value
HIV Ab positivity
Drinking alcohol No 3/20 (15.0) 1.00 1.00
Yes 3/106 (2.8) 0.17 (0.03–0.89) 0.036 0.17 (0.03–1.15) 0.070
Age at first sexual intercourse < 15 years old 3/14 (21.4) 1.00 1.00
> 15 years old 3/112 (2.7) 0.10 (0.02–0.56) 0.009 0.08 (0.01–0.59) 0.013
Using sex toys No 3/104 (2.9) 1.00 1.00
Yes 3/22 (13.6) 5.32 (1.00–28.34) 0.050 7.37 (1.00–53.85) 0.049
Treponema pallidum Ab positivity
Smoking No 3/90 (3.3) 1.00 1.00
Yes 5/36 (13.9) 4.68 (1.06–20.73) 0.042 8.86 (1.59–49.26) 0.013
Receptive anal sex No 5/106 (4.7) 1.00 1.00
Yes 3/19 (15.8) 3.79 (0.82–17.41) 0.087 14.51 (1.88–111.76) 0.010
Oral sex No 3/17 (17.7) 1.00 1.00
Yes 5/109 (4.6) 0.22 (0.05–1.04) 0.057 0.06 (0.01–0.48) 0.008
HBsAg positivity
Marital status Single 6/82 (7.3) 1.00 1.00
Has a partner 1/24 (4.2) 0.55 (0.06–4.81) 0.590
Separated/divorced/widowed 5/20 (25.0) 4.22 (1.14–15.64) 0.031 4.37 (1.20–15.60) 0.025
HCV Ab positivity
Drug used, in the past 3 months No 1/113 (0.9) 1.00
Yes 2/13 (15.4) 20.36 (1.71–242.94) 0.017 N.S.

Discussion

This study found an overall high seroprevalence for HIV, syphilis, HBV, and HCV, with differences according to the sex of the participants: male sex workers had a higher seroprevalence for HIV (13% vs. 4.8%), syphilis (23.9% vs. 6.4%) and HCV (6.5% vs. 2.4%), while women had higher HBsAg seroprevalence (9.5% vs. 4.4%). These seroprevalences are much higher than those reported in pre-pandemic studies [26] in Thailand during 2017–2019 i.e. 2–5% HIV and 3–14% syphilis among MSM, TGW, and migrants engaged in sex work [26]. Importantly, we observed cases newly diagnosed with HIV (10 of 24 HIV Ab positive, 41.7%), syphilis (19 of 41 Treponema Ab positive, 46.3%), HBV (11 of 18 HBsAg positive, 61.1%), and HCV (9 of 12 HCV Ab positive, 75%) infections. These findings may indicate that these infections are still being detected during the relaxation of the COVID-19 quarantine measures. Although entertainment venues were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic, some sex workers continued to sell sex and became non-venue-based sex workers or freelancers. They found creative ways to continue offering personal services through many social internet platforms to find their own clients. In this study, 34.5% of sex workers were freelance or non-venue based. Unlike venue-based sex workers who were required to be tested for HIV/STI every 3 months, non-venue-based sex workers are not required to undergo regular STI or HIV testing. Previous study has also shown a significant decrease in HIV/STIs visits and testing rates during the COVID-19 pandemic [11]. In addition, access to HIV/STI testing and treatment was also difficult and limited during the COVID-19 pandemic due to numerous restrictions on specialist medical care. These factors may increase the risk of exposure to HIV and also to other STIs.

Although HCV is usually transmitted via contact with the blood of an infected person, it can also be transmitted through sexual activity. Having multiple partners, having a STI, or engaging in an anal sex appear to increase the risk of exposure to HCV. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we found that the prevalence of HCV among sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand was higher than that reported in 2019, at 4.6% and 2.3%, respectively. Another similar study conducted in Ethiopia in 2021 reported a higher rate of HCV (6.7%) [12]. In addition, a study in Spain showed that COVID-19 has hindered HCV and HIV screening, particularly in marginalized groups. The authors assessed the prevalence of HCV during COVID-19 vaccination in a center for addiction services (CAS) in Barcelona and a mobile testing unit (MTU) in Madrid, Spain. A high prevalence of HCV was found with 31.5% of CAS participants being positive and 14.9% of MTU participants being positive [13].

In the present study, HBsAg seroprevalence was higher in women 9.5% vs. 4.4%, although not statistically different. This difference may be due to the age of women (35.5 years (IQR: 31–41) vs. 27 years (IQR: 22–32)) who were born before the introduction of the Expanded Program on Immunization and the provision of universal neonatal HB vaccine.

We also analyzed the factors associated with these four STIs based on gender. Male sex workers who reported having receptive anal sex were at high risk of HIV and syphilis infection. This finding is consistent with other studies reporting that receptive anal sex is the riskiest sexual behavior for HIV and syphilis infection [14, 15]. Drug abuse was one of the factors associated with syphilis infection among male sex workers as reported in other epidemiological studies of syphilis in Brazil [16, 17]. Moreover, other studies showed that drug use and receptive anal sex were also associated with syphilis [15, 18]. Selling or exchanging sex was also significantly associated with alcohol and drug use and especially with sex-related drugs such as amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS), methamphetamine, poppers, or Viagra [2]. In our study, 20.8% of participants were drug users, 56% of them were ATS users, demonstrating that drug use is widely associated with involvement in sex work. Drug use, especially ATS has appeared as a problem among sex workers in several countries [19]. Previous studies have also shown that the use of methamphetamine is associated with HIV and STI incidence [20, 21] as people who use drugs are more likely to engage in unsafe sexual behaviors (condomless sex, multiple sex partners, exchange of sex for drug), which put them at higher risk of STIs.

We found that male sex workers who has aged over 27 years old were more likely to be HCV Ab positive than those aged under 27 years. This finding is consistent with previous studies which have shown that older age is significantly associated with HCV infection [22, 23]. This may be explained by the fact that older adults may engage in risky behaviors such as tattoos, blood transfusions, or unclean injections which may increase the risk of HCV infection. In addition, our results showed that the risk of HCV was higher among male sex workers who reported injecting drug use and recreational drug used. Injection drug use is an important risk factor for HCV transmission because of the sharing of used needles and injecting equipment. The prevalence of HCV among drug injectors is generally high [24]. Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies [25, 26], which have shown that sex workers especially those who inject drugs are at high risk not only for HIV but also for HCV infection and transmission. We also found that male sex workers who reported recreational drug use were at high risk of both HCV and syphilis infection.

Among female sex workers, we found that those who had their first sexual intercourse at over 15 years were less likely to be HIV Ab positive than those who had their first sexual intercourse before 15 years of age. This is consistent with previous studies showing that early sexual debut is associated with factors that may increase a young person’s risk of HIV infection [27, 28]. One hypothesis to explain this may be that young sex workers have been exposed to multiple partners and are engaged in risk behaviors for HIV infection. We also found that female sex worker who smoke have a higher risk of syphilis infection. This is also in line with the report from China, which showed that current smoking and duration and frequency of smoking were associated with a higher risk of syphilis infection [29]. Smoking may be a surrogate marker of high risk behaviors, in particular increased sexual activity and less condom use [30]. In addition, the prevalence of HBV was higher in divorced women with a significant association which may related to age. This is consistent with another study showing that marital status is also associated with HBV infection [31].

This study has some limitations. First, the number of participants, the recruitment of participants was slow and challenging due to the closure of several entertainment venues in response to national restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, collection of data was based on self-reported measures through face-to-face interviews where responses may have been influenced by social desirability bias. Third, confirmatory testing for HIV and syphilis was not conducted; however, the participants who tested positive for HIV or syphilis were referred to the M Plus Clinic or the Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Chiangmai, for confirmation and treatment according to the national guidelines.

Conclusion

This study documents the high seroprevalence of HIV, syphilis, and HCV among sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand when nationwide COVID-19 restrictions were gradually lifted. Sex workers, especially young men, remain disproportionally affected by HIV and STIs. Despite the lockdown measures, new cases of HIV and syphilis infection were diagnosed, indicating that HIV and syphilis continue to spread and highlighting the need to provide access to HIV/STIs testing, prevention, and treatment services for this high-risk population. Other interventions such as increasing condom distribution, providing information on modes of transmission and methods of preventing the spread of disease should be provided. Innovative interventions such as mobile services, and outreach activities may be more useful than testing centers to reach non-venue-based sex workers or freelance workers for early HIV/STI detection and linkage to treatment and care.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Factors associated with HIV Ab positivity among male sex workers.

(PDF)

pone.0316668.s001.pdf (175.8KB, pdf)
S2 Table. Factors associated with Treponema pallidum Ab positivity among male sex workers.

(PDF)

pone.0316668.s002.pdf (175.7KB, pdf)
S3 Table. Factors associated with HBsAg positivity among male sex workers.

(PDF)

pone.0316668.s003.pdf (132.5KB, pdf)
S4 Table. Factors associated with HCV Ab positivity among male sex workers.

(PDF)

pone.0316668.s004.pdf (159.1KB, pdf)
S5 Table. Factors associated with HIV Ab positivity among female sex workers.

(PDF)

pone.0316668.s005.pdf (167.3KB, pdf)
S6 Table. Factors associated with Treponema pallidum Ab positivity among female sex workers.

(PDF)

pone.0316668.s006.pdf (169.9KB, pdf)
S7 Table. Factors associated with HBsAg positivity among female sex workers.

(PDF)

pone.0316668.s007.pdf (143.5KB, pdf)
S8 Table. Factors associated with HCV Ab positivity among female sex workers.

(PDF)

pone.0316668.s008.pdf (144.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge all participants who were involved in this study. We also thank M Plus Foundation and the Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Chiangmai staff members for their support and cooperation during the recruitment of participants and data collection.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by Chiang Mai University, Thailand. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Thailand AIDS Response Progress Report 2018. Nonthaburi, Thailand: National Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, Bureau of AIDS, TB, and STIs; 2018.
  • 2.Weir BW, Dun C, Wirtz AL, Mon SHH, Qaragholi N, Chemnasiri T, et al. Transactional sex, HIV and health among young cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men in Thailand. Ann Epidemiol. 2022;72:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.03.012 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nanthaprut P, Manojai N, Chanlearn P, Mattawanon N, Chiawkhun P, Homkham N, et al. Comparison of HIV-Positive Incidence Among Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men at Stand-Alone and Mobile Voluntary Counseling and Testing Facilities in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2021;35(4):116–25. doi: 10.1089/apc.2020.0258 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hongjaisee S, Khamduang W, Sripan P, Choyrum S, Thepbundit V, Kosashunhanan N, et al. Uncommon hepatitis C virus among migrant sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(10):1523–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hongjaisee S, Khamduang W, Sripan P, Choyrum S, Thepbundit V, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B and D virus infections among migrant sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand: A cross-sectional study in 2019. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;100:247–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tangmunkongvorakul A, O’corner S, Srithanaviboonchai K, Sripan P, Banwell C, DKelly M. Sexual behavior, condom use and rates of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among male and female non-Thai sex workers in Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand. The 24th Internation AIDS Conference; Montreal, Canada2022.
  • 7.Sentís A, Prats-Uribe A, López-Corbeto E, Montoro-Fernandez M, Nomah DK, de Olalla PG, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Sexually Transmitted Infections surveillance data: incidence drop or artefact? BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1637. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11630-x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schumacher CM, Thornton N, Wagner J, Tilchin C, Ghanem KG, Hamill MM, et al. Sexually Transmitted Infection Transmission Dynamics During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Among Urban Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(1):e1137–e44. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1053 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2020.
  • 10.Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(1):125–37. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115101 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tao J, Napoleon SC, Maynard MA, Almonte A, Silva E, Toma E, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Visits. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(1):e5–e7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001306 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wondmagegn M, Wondimeneh Y, Getaneh A, Ayalew G. Seroprevalence of Hepatitis B Virus, Hepatitis C Virus, Syphilis and Associated Factors Among Female Sex Workers in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:5915–27. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S380952 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lazarus JV, Villota-Rivas M, Ryan P, Buti M, Grau-López L, Cuevas G, et al. Combined COVID-19 vaccination and hepatitis C virus screening intervention in marginalised populations in Spain. Commun Med (Lond). 2023;3(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00292-y . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cornelisse VJ, Chow EPF, Latimer RL, Towns J, Chen M, Bradshaw CS, et al. Getting to the Bottom of It: Sexual Positioning and Stage of Syphilis at Diagnosis, and Implications for Syphilis Screening. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(2):318–22. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz802 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.He H, Wang M, Zaller N, Wang J, Song D, Qu Y, et al. Prevalence of syphilis infection and associations with sexual risk behaviours among HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2013;25(6):410–9. doi: 10.1177/0956462413512804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baia KLN, Cordeiro ACC, Frade PCR, Gouveia AGN, Resque RL, Pinheiro LML, et al. Syphilis and Co-Infections with HIV-1, HBV, and HCV among People Who Use Crack-Cocaine in Northern Brazil. Pathogens [Internet]. 2022; 11(9). doi: 10.3390/pathogens11091055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coelho EC, Souza SB, Costa CCS, Costa LM, Pinheiro LML, Machado LFA, et al. Treponema pallidum in female sex workers from the Brazilian Marajó Archipelago: prevalence, risk factors, drug-resistant mutations and coinfections. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115(7):792–800. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa127 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Champenois K, Cousien A, Ndiaye B, Soukouna Y, Baclet V, Alcaraz I, et al. Risk factors for syphilis infection in men who have sex with men: results of a case-control study in Lille, France. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(2):128–32. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050523 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kulsudjarit K. Drug problem in southeast and southwest Asia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1025:446–57. doi: 10.1196/annals.1316.055 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thienkrua W, van Griensven F, Mock PA, Dunne EF, Raengsakulrach B, Wimonsate W, et al. Young Men Who Have Sex with Men at High Risk for HIV, Bangkok MSM Cohort Study, Thailand 2006–2014. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(7):2137–46. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1963-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Couture MC, Sansothy N, Sapphon V, Phal S, Sichan K, Stein E, et al. Young women engaged in sex work in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, have high incidence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections, and amphetamine-type stimulant use: new challenges to HIV prevention and risk. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(1):33–9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182000e47 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim T, Kim J. Factors Associated with Hepatitis C Antibody Positivity in Korean Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on 2013–2018 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(10). doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101366 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu P, Ding GW, Wang XC, Ye SD, Hei FX, Yu JJ, et al. Prevalence of HCV Antibody and its Associated Factors: A Study from Sentinel Hospitals in China. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. 2023;36(4):334–42. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Degenhardt L, Peacock A, Colledge S, Leung J, Grebely J, Vickerman P, et al. Global prevalence of injecting drug use and sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of HIV, HBV, and HCV in people who inject drugs: a multistage systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):e1192–e207. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30375-3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Johnston LG, Corceal S. Unexpectedly high injection drug use, HIV and hepatitis C prevalence among female sex workers in the Republic of Mauritius. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(2):574–84. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0278-y . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Taylor A, Hutchinson SJ, Gilchrist G, Cameron S, Carr S, Goldberg DJ. Prevalence and determinants of hepatitis C virus infection among female drug injecting sex workers in Glasgow. Harm Reduct J. 2008;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-5-11 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ghebremichael M, Larsen U, Paintsil E. Association of age at first sex with HIV-1, HSV-2, and other sexual transmitted infections among women in northern Tanzania. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36(9):570–6. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a866b8 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pettifor A, O’Brien K, MacPhail C, Miller WC, Rees H. Early Coital Debut and Associated HIV Risk Factors among Young Women and Men in South Africa. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2009;35(2):82–90. doi: 10.1363/ifpp.35.082.09 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xiao Y, Li SL, Lin HL, Lin ZF, Zhu XZ, Fan JY, et al. Factors associated with syphilis infection: a comprehensive analysis based on a case-control study. Epidemiology & Infection. 2015;144(6):1165–74. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815002344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wolf R, Freedman D. Cigarette smoking, sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV/AIDS. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39(1):1–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2000.00721.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ghadir MR, Belbasi M, Heidari A, Jandagh M, Ahmadi I, Habibinejad H, et al. Distribution and risk factors of hepatitis B virus infection in the general population of Central Iran. Hepat Mon. 2012;12(2):112–7. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.822 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yury E Khudyakov

22 Nov 2024

PONE-D-24-46408Seroprevalence and associated factors of HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C infections among sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand during easing of COVID-19 lockdown measuresPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hongjaisee,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Your manuscript was reviewed by two experts in the field. Both found many important problems in your submission. Please review the attached comments and provide point-by-point responses.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 05 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yury E Khudyakov, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:  [Chiang Mai University].

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study attempts to provide an overview regarding the prevalence of HIV, Syphilis, HBV and HCV infections among sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand. The study well describes the current status (seroprevalence) of these infections in this specific group, including prevalent risk factors and routes of transmission (younger age at first sex for female sex workers / receptive anal sex and injection drug use for male sex workers). The authors also give their comments to the related results, refer to similar previous studies in other countries and make a good comparison between Thailand and other countries. The authors conclude that despite the current data regarding the prevalence of these infections among sex workers in Thailand, there is still a gap where additional researches are needed in order to optimize the control and prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Overall, I found that the authors have provided a high-quality study and given a substantial amount of data helping to understand better the current epidemiology status of sexually transmitted infections in Thailand. The findings of this study contribute further evidence for informing reforms to the national guidelines for the management, prevention, and control of sexually transmitted infections. The following comments need addressing:

1. The authors should address the availability of national policies or guidelines for prevention and control of sexually transmitted infections among sex workers population in Thailand.

2. Since plasma samples were tested with rapid immunochromatographic diagnostic tests, the authors should provide the sensitivity and specificity of tests.

Reviewer #2: The authors estimated the seroprevalence of several STIs among sexual workers in Thailand by recruiting participants during COVID-19. The authors also assessed the potential factors that were linked to a higher seroprevalence of STIs. Below are some suggestions to help improve the content and scientific presentation of the study.

1. Lines 91-93. The recruitment period was from 1 Mar 2022 to 31 Dec 2022. “In this period, lockdown and confinement measures were being lifted, but night entertainment venues were still closed until June 2022.” The information referred to the situation that no lockdown and confinement measures throughout the recruitment period while night entertainment venues were still closed until June 2022. That is, the closure of “night entertainment venues” was the only measure relating to COVID-19 during the recruitment period. In this case, the authors are suggested to compare and/or discuss the seroprevalence of STIs and the associated factors before and after night entertainment venues were “resumed”. This is to respond to the title for the changes “during easing of COVID lockdown measures”.

2. Please include sample size estimation. If no sample size estimation was done before the study, please justify or provide the reason.

3. Lines 139-142. Multivariable logistic regression analyses.

3.a. Cite the reference(s) and the justification for using p at 0.250 as the threshold to pick variables in the multivariable model.

3.b. “Variables that were not statistically significant with a p-value of >0.250 were removed from the model using a forward selection method.” Please elaborate on how to “remove” a variable when using a “forward selection method”.

4.a. Please change “p=0.000” to “p<0.001” throughout the text and the table.

4.b. Be consistence about the decimal places used for p-values. P-values for seroprevalence comparison on lines 166-177 were based on 3 decimal places while only 2 decimal places were presented for p-values for factor associations on lines 183-213.

5. Table 1. Include the p-value for comparing each characteristic between males and females, using the appropriate statistical tests. State the statistical tests that will be used in “Data analysis”.

6. Table 2. Please indicate whether the p-values referred to the comparison of seroprevalence between males and females. Include the total number of participants of each group (Total, Male, and Female) in the header row.

7. Please explain or justify the thresholds used to categorize continuous variables into discrete groups in the regression analyses. For example, in lines 266-267, the authors discussed that male sexual workers who were over 27 years old were more likely to be HCV Ab positive. Why did they use 27 years old at the threshold/cutoff but not 30 or 25?

8. Please also convert or include the monetary values into USD.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Fatemeh Farshadpour

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0316668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316668.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


12 Dec 2024

Thank you very much for taking the time to review this manuscript and for giving us the opportunity to clarify and improve our manuscript. Please find the attached files which provide point-by-point responses and the corresponding revisions/corrections highlighted in the re-submitted manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responses to reviewer 2.docx

pone.0316668.s009.docx (22.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Yury E Khudyakov

16 Dec 2024

Seroprevalence and associated factors of HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C infections among sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand during easing of COVID-19 lockdown measures

PONE-D-24-46408R1

Dear Dr. Hongjaisee,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Yury E Khudyakov, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Yury E Khudyakov

19 Dec 2024

PONE-D-24-46408R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hongjaisee,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yury E Khudyakov

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Factors associated with HIV Ab positivity among male sex workers.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316668.s001.pdf (175.8KB, pdf)
    S2 Table. Factors associated with Treponema pallidum Ab positivity among male sex workers.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316668.s002.pdf (175.7KB, pdf)
    S3 Table. Factors associated with HBsAg positivity among male sex workers.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316668.s003.pdf (132.5KB, pdf)
    S4 Table. Factors associated with HCV Ab positivity among male sex workers.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316668.s004.pdf (159.1KB, pdf)
    S5 Table. Factors associated with HIV Ab positivity among female sex workers.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316668.s005.pdf (167.3KB, pdf)
    S6 Table. Factors associated with Treponema pallidum Ab positivity among female sex workers.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316668.s006.pdf (169.9KB, pdf)
    S7 Table. Factors associated with HBsAg positivity among female sex workers.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316668.s007.pdf (143.5KB, pdf)
    S8 Table. Factors associated with HCV Ab positivity among female sex workers.

    (PDF)

    pone.0316668.s008.pdf (144.8KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to reviewer 2.docx

    pone.0316668.s009.docx (22.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES