Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 18;11:1486611. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1486611

Table 5.

Association between WHtR and osteoporosis after adjusting for the covariate of vitamin D.

WHtR No. Crude OR (95%CI) p-value Model 1 OR (95% CI) p-value Model 2 OR (95% CI) p-value Model 3 OR (95% CI) p-value
Q1 [0.36, 0.56] 1,152 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Q2 [0.56, 0.61] 1,152 0.68 (0.49, 0.94) 0.019 0.78 (0.56, 1.09) 0.141 0.76 (0.53, 1.09) 0.133 0.78 (0.54, 1.13) 0.184
Q3 [0.61, 0.66] 1,152 0.44 (0.31, 0.63) <0.001 0.51 (0.35, 0.74) <0.001 0.48 (0.33, 0.70) <0.001 0.47 (0.32, 0.70) <0.001
Q4 [0.66,0.94] 1,153 0.46 (0.33, 0.63) <0.001 0.47 (0.34, 0.66) <0.001 0.52 (0.37, 0.74) <0.001 0.52 (0.36, 0.76) 0.001
Trend test <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

WHtR, waist to height ratio; Q, quartiles; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref: reference.

Crude: no other covariates were adjusted.

Model 1 was adjusted for gender, uric acid.

Model 2 was adjusted for model1 + age, race, poverty income ratio (PIR), educational level, smoking status, drinking status, diabetes mellitus (DM), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), alanine transaminase (ALT), serum total bilirubin, serum phosphorus.

Model 3 was adjusted for model2 + cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension, aspartate transaminase (AST), serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum sodium, total calcium, serum potassim, serum iron, VitD.