Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 18;11:1235183. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1235183

Table 2.

Factors influencing inter- and transdisciplinarity in our project.

Category Positive influence Negative influence
Individual factors Project coordinator’s commitment, relational and communication skills
Openness of most project members to interdisciplinarity
Limited interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary experience among members
Institutional factors Incentives to pursue inter- and transdisciplinary approaches Lack of specific incentives for ITDR approaches on SARS-cov2
Time pressure in short-term projects
Pressure to publish, limiting time for inter- and transdisciplinary activities
Project design and management Site-based approach to studying relationships between rodents, pathogens, and humans Lack of early involvement of societal actors in the project
Lack of social scientists outside France
High proportion of students with a disciplinary training
Geographical and linguistic factors Physical distance between project members
Use of English for interviews with societal actors at national level outside France, limiting engagement
Related to the pandemic Increased awareness of zoonoses and their impact Restrictions on in-person fieldwork and meetings during the first 2 years
Problem wickedness Productive discussions with site managers on practical communication and management issues and on the health-biodiversity nexus Difficulty engaging other societal actors