Table 2.
Factors influencing inter- and transdisciplinarity in our project.
| Category | Positive influence | Negative influence |
|---|---|---|
| Individual factors | Project coordinator’s commitment, relational and communication skills Openness of most project members to interdisciplinarity |
Limited interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary experience among members |
| Institutional factors | Incentives to pursue inter- and transdisciplinary approaches | Lack of specific incentives for ITDR approaches on SARS-cov2 Time pressure in short-term projects Pressure to publish, limiting time for inter- and transdisciplinary activities |
| Project design and management | Site-based approach to studying relationships between rodents, pathogens, and humans | Lack of early involvement of societal actors in the project Lack of social scientists outside France High proportion of students with a disciplinary training |
| Geographical and linguistic factors | Physical distance between project members Use of English for interviews with societal actors at national level outside France, limiting engagement |
|
| Related to the pandemic | Increased awareness of zoonoses and their impact | Restrictions on in-person fieldwork and meetings during the first 2 years |
| Problem wickedness | Productive discussions with site managers on practical communication and management issues and on the health-biodiversity nexus | Difficulty engaging other societal actors |