Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 31;4:283. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00704-7

Table 3.

SX vs NI

Unweighted Weighted
Model HR 95% CI p-Value HR 95% CI p-Value
Outcome: Eating disorder (composite)
Transfeminine 0.74 0.55, 1.00 0.047 1.31 0.91, 1.89 0.141
Transmasculine 0.37 0.31, 0.43 <0.001 0.62** 0.51, 0.75 <0.001
Outcome: Anorexia nervosa
Transfeminine 0.41 0.18, 0.95 0.037 1.23 0.46, 3.31 0.684
Transmasculine 0.3 0.21, 0.41 <0.001 0.44** 0.31, 0.63 <0.001
Outcome: Bulimia
Transfeminine 0.62 0.25, 1.57 0.315 1.14 0.43, 3.01 0.791
Transmasculine 0.55 0.35, 0.85 0.007 0.84 0.51, 1.38 0.496
Outcome: Binge eating
Transfeminine 1.01 0.41, 2.52 0.98 1.5 0.58, 3.90 0.402
Transmasculine 0.77 0.48, 1.25 0.296 1.01 0.59, 1.75 0.962

Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model on the outcome of a diagnosis of an eating disorder including Anorexia nervosa, Bulimia, Binge eating (analyzed as individual outcomes and as composite), among patients without any gender-affirming medical therapy (NI; reference group), to patients receiving surgical intervention (SX). Result shown both before and after inverse probability treatment weighting.

** Significant.