Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 18;12:1501793. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1501793

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of study.

First author, Year Country Settings Study design Sample size Age Tools Prevalence %/score Quality assessment score
Ayoob, 2024 (17) India Health centres Cross-sectional 250 68 ± 6.02 Oral functions and dental status 74% 7
Baba, 2022 (9) Japan Community Cross-sectional 210 74.2 ± 6.1 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 8.10% 10
Chew, 2023 (18) Singapore Hospital Cross-sectional 465 79.2 ± 8.3 ROAG 25% 9
Cruz-Moreira, 2023 (10) Ecuador Care homes Cross-sectional 589 72 (66–82) Oral function and subjective assessments 71% 10
Diaz-Toro, 2022 (31) Chile Community Cross-sectional 1,186 ≥60 Dental status and oral functions 8
Hasegawa, 2020 (19) Japan Community Prospective 425 72.2 ± 5.6 Dental status and oral functions KCL. 49.60% 9
Hoshino, 2021 (7) Japan Community Cross-sectional 481 75.9 ± 6.3 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 21.20% 10
Ishii, 2022 (20) Japan Clinic Cross-sectional 111 79.7 ± 3.8 OFI-8 53.20% 10
Iwasaki, 2020 (5) Japan Community Cross-sectional 1,054 77 ± 4.8 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 20.40% 10
Iwasaki, 2020 (11) Japan Community Prospective 466 76.4 ± 4.1 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 14.40% 9
Iwasaki, 2021 (21) Japan Community Cross-sectional 1,082 77.1 ± 4.7 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 21.00% 10
Iwasaki, 2024 (12) Japan Community Cross-sectional 1,206 74.7 ± 5.5 OF-5 36.70% 10
Kamdem, 2017 (22) Switzerland Community Cross-sectional 992 74.9 ± 1.39 Dental status and oral functions 14.80% 10
Kamide, 2023 (23) Japan Community Cross-sectional 237 76.0 ± 5.7 OFI-8 54.90% 8
Kimble, 2023 (32) United Kingdom Community Prospective 5,212 70–92 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 9
Komatsu, 2021 (33) Japan Community Cross-sectional 380 72.8 ± 5.6 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 14% 9
Kugimiya, 2020 (24) Japan Community Cross-sectional 679 76.3 ± 6.5 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 22.50% 10
Kuo, 2022 (34) Taiwan Community Cross-sectional 308 79.7 ± 7.2 Oral frailty checklist 4.87 ± 2.51 10
Nagatani, 2023 (25) Japan Community Prospective 1,410 72.4 ± 5.2 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 16.90% 9
Nishimoto, 2023 (26) Japan Community Prospective 1,234 72.2 ± 5.1 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 23.10% 9
Ohara, 2020 (13) Japan Community Cross-sectional 722 79.1 ± 4.5 Dental status and oral functions 19.30% 10
Shimazaki, 2020 (27) Japan Community Cross-sectional 978 65–85 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 60% 10
Shwe, 2023 (35) Australia Hospital Cross-sectional 115 80 ± 8.0 OHAT 4.3 ± 2.3 9
Tanaka, 2023 (28) Japan Community Prospective 2031 73.1 ± 5.6 OF-5 39.30% 9
Tani, 2022 (36) Japan Community Cross-sectional 381 72.6 ± 3.9 Dental status and oral functions and ODK 7.9 ± 1.2 9
Velázquez-Olmedo, 2021 (29) Mexico Community Prospective 663 68.1 ± 6.1 Dental status and oral functions. 21.30% 9
Watanabe, 2016 (37) Japan Community Cross-sectional 4,720 72.1 ± 5.6 Dental status and oral functions, and ODK 9
Yoshida, 2021 (30) Japan Community Cross-sectional 340 75 Dental status, oral functions and subjective assessments 53.50% 9

ODK, oral diadochokinesis; ROAG, The Revised Oral Assessment Guide; KCL, Kihon checklist; OFI-8, The Oral Frailty Index-8; OF-5, Oral Frailty 5-Item Checklist; OHAT, Oral Health Assessment Test.