TABLE 5.
Patient no.a | Strain no./food type | Phenotypic characterization
|
Genotypic characterization
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biotyping testse
|
Bioserogroupb | CR-BHOc | PFGE (NotI)d | Multiplex PCR (yst rfbC ail virF)e | ||||||||
Sal | Escul | Pyz | Xyl | Treh | VP | Lip | ||||||
7 | 50A/minced pork | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | 4/O:3 | +++ | NA | + + + + |
10 | 75A/minced pork | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | 4/O:3 | +++ | NA | + + + + |
19 | 3a/ham | − | − | (+) | − | + | + | − | 4/O:3 | ++ | NJ | + + + + |
5a/loin of pork | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | 4/O:3 | +++ | ND | + + + + | |
22 | 47/minced pork | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | 4/O:3 | +++ | NA | + + + + |
32 | 237A1/fillet of pork | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | 4/O:3 | +++ | NC | + + + + |
49 | 303/dog feed | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | 4/O:3 | +++ | NI | + + + + |
11 | 43 1/pork chop | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 1A | − | Nx | − − − − |
32 | 235A4/loin of pork | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 1A | − | Nx | − − − − |
54 | 365A1/minced pork | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 1A | − | Nx | − − − − |
54 | 366 2/ham | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 1A | − | Nx | − − − − |
Refers to the patient numbers listed in Table 4.
Biotyped according to the reduced biotyping scheme proposed by Wauters et al. (34) and serotyped by using monovalent antisera agglutination tests.
CR-BHO results: +/−, presence/absence of pinpoint colonies (numbers of visible pinpoint colonies are indicated as +, ≤10; ++, 10 to 150; or +++, >150).
Nx, NotI profiles different from those found in the Y. enterocolitica 4/O:3 strains.
+/−, positive and negative reactions, respectively; (+), weak positive reaction. See footnote d of Table 4 for abbreviations.