Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul;71(7):3734–3740. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3734-3740.2005

TABLE 2.

Estimated enterovirus concentrations in river samples as determined by cell culture, RT-PCR, and NASBA

Sample River PFU/liter in cell culture Method I (2PHS + Boom) RT-PCR at PDU/liter (p2.5-p97.5)b Method II (UF + Magnetic extraction)
RT-PCR at PDU/liter (p2.5-p97.5)b NASBA at NDU/liter (p2.5-p97.5)b
02-8a A 1.4 2.6 (0.15-11.6) 1,340 (308-5,165) 9,548 (1,249-72,843)
02-9a A 1.35 0.88 (0.21-2.5) 91.5 (19.5-358) 388 (76.0-1,304)
03-2a A 0 0 (0-0.05) 0 (0-20.0) 0 (0-28.9)
04-1a B 0.26 0 (0-0.08) 1,317 (282-4,380) 0 (0-82.9)
04-2a B 0.17 0 (0-0.04) 189 (43.6-726) 32.9 (5.4-104)
01-1 C 0.31 1,390 (244-5,753) 826 (107-5,978)
01-2 C 0.27 168 (26.6-762) 178 (20.2-824)
01-3 C 0.80 97.3 (13.7-502) 435 (77.6-1,479)
01-4 C 0.90 144 (22.7-649) 152 (17.2-702)
01-5 C 0.19 0 (0-31.5) 0 (0-57.8)
01-6 C 0.65 55.0 (7.7-284) 706 (91.6-5,110)
01-7 C 0.35 68.1 (11.0-224) 346 (39.2-1,602)
03-3 A 0.12 30.5 (1.7-141) 0 (0-48.9)
04-3 D 0.56 241 (33.8-1,243) 0 (0-95.5)
04-4 D 0 0 (0-26.0) 0 (0-26.2)
a

Samples described in Table 1.

b

95% confidence intervals are given in parentheses.