Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul;43(7):3101–3109. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3101-3109.2005

TABLE 2.

Distribution of emm types among invasive and noninvasive isolates

emm type No. (%) of isolates
Invasive Noninvasive
1 65 (32.3) 35 (9.9)
2 1 (0.5) 20 (5.7)
3 8 (4.0) 13 (3.7)
4 10 (5.0) 56 (15.9)
5 0 (0.0) 5 (1.4)
6 7 (3.5) 50 (14.2)
9 2 (1.0) 8 (2.3)
11 4 (2.0) 3 (0.9)
12 11 (5.5) 58 (16.5)
22 2 (1.0) 12 (3.4)
28 40 (19.9) 43 (12.2)
29 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3)
43 3 (1.5) 0 (0.0)
49 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3)
58 1 (0.5) 2 (0.6)
70 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3)
73 0 (0.0) 3 (0.9)
75 3 (1.5) 10 (2.8)
76 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)
77 5 (2.5) 11 (3.1)
78 4 (2.0) 1 (0.3)
87 2 (1.0) 4 (1.1)
88 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)
89 20 (10.0) 10 (2.8)
94 4 (2.0) 2 (0.6)
102 1 (0.5) 1 (0.3)
105 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3)
109 1 (0.5) 1 (0.3)
110 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)
27G 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)
st1389 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)
st3757 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)
No emma 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)
Total 201 (100) 352 (100)
a

One isolate was not available for emm typing.