Abstract
Introduction
The rise of vaping, especially among young adults in Saudi Arabia, has raised concerns due to the lack of awareness of the health risks associated with electronic cigarette use. This study examines the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) among university students in Riyadh, focusing on smoking behaviors and their influence on GERD symptoms.
Methodology
This cross-sectional study was conducted from July to September 2024, including random students aged 18 and above from several universities in Riyadh city. An online questionnaire, distributed via social media platforms, collected demographic data, smoking behaviors, and GERD prevalence using the validated Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ). Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 27.0, Armonk, NY).
Results
The study sample included 403 students. GERD was diagnosed in 93 (64.6%) of students with health problems. Smoking habits revealed that 93 (23.1%) smoked tobacco and 176 (43.7%) used electronic cigarettes. Students who smoked or vaped reported greater GERD symptom scores than nonsmokers. A substantial gender difference was found, with men reporting more GERD symptoms than women. Body mass index (BMI) also increased GERD severity, with overweight and obese students reporting higher symptoms. Smoking duration was inversely associated with symptom severity, with newer smokers experiencing more severe symptoms. The frequency of vaping was also linked to increased GERD symptoms, with frequent vapers (four to seven days per week) scoring higher.
Conclusions
GERD is prevalent among university students in Riyadh, especially among smokers and electronic cigarette users. Smoking behavior, gender, and BMI significantly influenced GERD symptoms. These findings highlight the need for public health initiatives to reduce smoking and vaping among young adults and promote awareness of the risks of GERD.
Keywords: arab countries, electronic cigarette, gerd, obesity, smoking
Introduction
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive problem defined by the reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus, resulting in symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, and mucosal injury [1]. There is a substantial link between smoking and GERD, although the pathophysiologic mechanism is unknown and complex [2,3]. Furthermore, nicotine is thought to be the primary etiological cause due to its ability to relax the smooth muscle of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Furthermore, smoking increases the amount of acid produced by the stomach and enhances acidic secretions, both of which raise the risk of esophageal injury [4]. The vape, also known as an electronic cigarette or E-cigarette, is marketed as a healthier alternative to traditional cigarettes since it provides nicotine in the form of an aerosol without the use of tobacco [5]. Vapes mix nicotine, vegetable glycerin, propylene glycol, and other flavors with potentially dangerous ingredients in a fluid mixture [6]. E-cigarettes heat these chemicals, producing an aerosol [7]. According to an Al-Qassim University survey [1], approximately one in every 10 medical students admitted to using e-cigarettes. It is projected that smoking incidence ranges among Saudi Arabian students studying dentistry, pharmacy, and medical science, ranging from 7.9% to 13.4% to 29% [8]. GERD is more prevalent in Asian and Arab nations [9]. A patient's quality of life is significantly reduced by GERD [10]. Furthermore, by irritating the esophageal mucosa, prolonged acid reflux may induce Barrett's esophagus, which can lead to esophageal cancer [11]. The use of vaping among teens and young people has recently surged in Saudi Arabia and around the world due to a lack of information about the health consequences of e-cigarettes and advertisements that promote e-cigarettes as healthier than traditional smoking [8]. We aim to assess the prevalence of GERD among university students in Riyadh and its relation to E-cigarette smoking.
Materials and methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted from July to September 2024. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Al-Maarifa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (approval number: IRB24-072). A sample size of 403 random students from different universities was estimated using the online Raosoft sample size calculator (Raosoft, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA), with a margin of error of 5% and a confidence interval of 95%. The inclusion criteria were smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers aged 18 and above, and the exclusion criteria were graduates and students who live outside of Riyadh. An online questionnaire was created with Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) and distributed through social media platforms including WhatsApp (WhatsApp LLC), and Telegram (Telegram Group Inc., Dubai, UAE). The first section of the questionnaire included demographic data and past medical history, the second section was related to smoking behaviors, and the third section was on GERD prevalence using a validated GERD questionnaire (GerdQ). The GerdQ was validated in a previous study [12]. IBM SPSS Statistics software Windows, Version 27.0 (released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was used to statistically analyze the data. The Chi-squared test (χ2) was employed for quantitative data expressed as numbers and percentages to analyze the relationship between variables. For the analysis of GERD symptoms, the frequency of symptoms was categorized into four groups based on occurrence per week: 0 days = 0, 1 day = 1, 2 or 3 days = 2, and 4 to 7 days = 3. This scoring system allowed for the quantification of symptom frequency in relation to other variables. GERD symptoms score ranged from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating more frequent and severe symptoms. Inferential statistics were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test to compare GERD symptom scores across different categories of demographic and lifestyle factors. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons involving more than two groups, while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between two unequal groups. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant.
Results
The distribution of age groups is as follows: 86 individuals (21.3%) are aged 18-20, 124 (30.8%) are aged 21-23, 103 (25.6%) are aged 24-26, and 90 (22.3%) are older than 26. The gender breakdown shows that 87 participants (21.6%) are female, while 316 (78.4%) are male. Marital status indicates that 22 participants (5.5%) are married and 381 (94.5%) are single. Regarding body mass index (BMI), 43 individuals (10.7%) are underweight, 186 (46.2%) have a normal BMI, 97 (24.1%) are overweight, 72 (17.9%) are obese, and five (1.2%) are extremely obese. The universities represented include Al Faisal University (N=36, 8.9%), Al-Yamaha University (N=32, 7.9%), Al-Maarefa University (N=41, 10.2%), Arab Open University (N=19, 4.7%), Dar Al Loom University (N=19, 4.7%), Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (N=18, 4.5%), Inayah Medical Colleges (N=22, 5.5%), King Saud bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences (N=52, 12.9%), King Saud University (N=28, 6.9%), Prince Sultan University (N=35, 8.7%), Princess Norah Bint Abdul Rahman University (N=27, 6.7%), Riyadh College of Technology - Males (N=35, 8.7%), Riyadh Elm University (N=11, 2.7%), and Vision College - Riyadh (N=28, 6.9%). In terms of the academic year, 52 students (12.9%) are in their first year, 38 (9.4%) are in their second year, 102 (25.3%) are in their third year, 90 (22.3%) are in their fourth year, 40 (9.9%) are in their fifth year, and 81 (20.1%) are in their sixth year. Of the 403 participants, 145 (36.0%) reported having underlying medical problems, with GERD being the most common (N=93, 64.6%). Other conditions include hiatal hernia (N=45, 31.3%), diabetes mellitus (N=34, 23.6%), asthma (N=28, 19.4%), anemia (N=28, 19.4%), disc prolapse (N=25, 17.4%), nausea (N=23, 16.0%), shortness of breath (N=23, 16.0%), hypertension (N=3, 2.1%), and irritable bowel syndrome (N=3, 2.1%) (Table 1).
Table 1. Demographic and Medical Characteristics of University Students.
| Characteristics | N | % | |
| Age | 18-20 | 86 | 21.3 |
| 21-23 | 124 | 30.8 | |
| 24-26 | 103 | 25.6 | |
| Older than 26 | 90 | 22.3 | |
| Gender | Female | 87 | 21.6 |
| Male | 316 | 78.4 | |
| Marital status | Married | 22 | 5.5 |
| Single | 381 | 94.5 | |
| BMI | Underweight (<18.5) | 43 | 10.7 |
| Normal (18.5-24.9) | 186 | 46.2 | |
| Overweight (25-29.9) | 97 | 24.1 | |
| Obese (30-34.9) | 72 | 17.9 | |
| Extremely obese (>35) | 5 | 1.2 | |
| University | Al Faisal University | 36 | 8.9 |
| Al-Yamaha University | 32 | 7.9 | |
| Al-Maarifa university | 41 | 10.2 | |
| Arab Open University | 19 | 4.7 | |
| Dar Al Uloom University | 19 | 4.7 | |
| Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University | 18 | 4.5 | |
| Inayah Medical Colleges | 22 | 5.5 | |
| King Saud bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences | 52 | 12.9 | |
| King Saud University | 28 | 6.9 | |
| Prince Sultan University | 35 | 8.7 | |
| Princess Norah Bint Abdul Rahman University | 27 | 6.7 | |
| Riyadh College of Technology - Males | 35 | 8.7 | |
| Riyadh Elm University | 11 | 2.7 | |
| Vision College - Riyadh | 28 | 6.9 | |
| College year | 1st | 52 | 12.9 |
| 2nd | 38 | 9.4 | |
| 3rd | 102 | 25.3 | |
| 4th | 90 | 22.3 | |
| 5th | 40 | 9.9 | |
| 6th | 81 | 20.1 | |
| Do you have any underlying medical problems? | No | 258 | 64.0 |
| Yes | 145 | 36.0 | |
| If yes to the above question please specify (N=145) | GERD | 93 | 64.6 |
| Hiatal hernia | 45 | 31.3 | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 34 | 23.6 | |
| Asthma | 28 | 19.4 | |
| Anemia | 28 | 19.4 | |
| Disc prolapse | 25 | 17.4 | |
| Nausea | 23 | 16.0 | |
| Shortness of breath | 23 | 16.0 | |
| Hypertension | 3 | 2.1 | |
| Irritable bowel syndrome | 3 | 2.1 | |
Smoking behaviors are reported as follows: 310 individuals (76.9%) do not smoke tobacco cigarettes, while 93 (23.1%) are current smokers. Among the 93 smokers, the majority, 91 (97.8%), continue to smoke, with only two (2.2%) having quit. Within the past week, 28 smokers (30.1%) reported smoking 10 cigarettes or less, 22 (23.7%) smoked 11-20 cigarettes, 30 (32.3%) smoked 21-30 cigarettes, and 13 (14.0%) smoked 31 or more cigarettes. Regarding the duration of smoking, 39 individuals (41.9%) have smoked for less than five years, 29 (31.2%) for 5-10 years, 21 (22.6%) for 10-15 years, and four (4.3%) for more than 15 years. Concerning hookah (sheeshah) use, 314 participants (77.9%) do not use it, whereas 89 (22.1%) do. Of those who use hookah, 86 (96.6%) continue to smoke, and three (3.4%) have quit. Among the 89 hookah users, 42 (47.2%) have smoked for less than five years, 26 (29.2%) for 5-10 years, 19 (21.3%) for 10-15 years, and two (2.2%) for more than 15 years. Regarding e-cigarette (vape) use, 176 participants (43.7%) are current users, 220 (54.6%) have never used them, and seven (1.7%) have quit. Among the 183 current or former users, 39 (21.3%) use e-cigarettes one day per week, 79 (43.2%) use them two to three days per week, and 65 (35.5%) use them four to seven days per week. The duration of e-cigarette use varies, with 46 users (25.1%) having used them for one to two years, 51 (27.9%) for six months to one year, 45 (24.5%) for less than six months, and 41 (22.4%) for more than two years. The average longevity of one cartridge of e-cigarette liquid is as follows: 27 users (14.7%) report it lasts 0-2 weeks, 41 (22.4%) report it lasts two to four weeks, 39 (21.3%) report four to six weeks, 33 (18.0%) report six to eight weeks, and 43 (23.5%) report more than eight weeks (Table 2).
Table 2. Smoking and Electronic Cigarette Usage Patterns.
| N | % | ||
| Do you smoke tobacco cigarettes? | No | 310 | 76.9 |
| Yes | 93 | 23.1 | |
| Do you have a history of smoking tobacco cigarettes? (N=93) | Continue to smoke | 91 | 97.8 |
| Quit | 2 | 2.2 | |
| If you are a smoker, how many cigarettes a day did you smoke in the past seven days? (N=93) | 10 cigarettes or less | 28 | 30.1 |
| 11-20 | 22 | 23.7 | |
| 21-30 | 30 | 32.3 | |
| 31 and more | 13 | 14.0 | |
| For how long have you smoked? (N=93) | less than 5 years | 39 | 41.9 |
| 5-10 years | 29 | 31.2 | |
| 10-15 years | 21 | 22.6 | |
| More than 15 years | 4 | 4.3 | |
| Do you use hookah (sheeshah) or not? | No | 314 | 77.9 |
| Yes | 89 | 22.1 | |
| Do you have a history of smoking hookah (sheeshah)? (N=89) | Continue to smoke | 86 | 96.6 |
| Quit | 3 | 3.4 | |
| For how long have you smoked hookah (sheeshah)? (N=89) | less than 5 years | 42 | 47.2 |
| 5-10 years | 26 | 29.2 | |
| 10-15 years | 19 | 21.3 | |
| More than 15 years | 2 | 2.2 | |
| Do you, or have you at any point previously, used electronic cigarettes (vape)? | Current user | 176 | 43.7 |
| Never | 220 | 54.6 | |
| Quit | 7 | 1.7 | |
| How many days per week do you use electronic cigarettes (vape)? (N=183) | 1 day | 39 | 21.3 |
| 2-3 days | 79 | 43.2 | |
| 4-7 days | 65 | 35.5 | |
| For how long have you been using electronic cigarettes (vape)? (N=183) | From one year to less than two years | 46 | 25.1 |
| From six months to 1 year | 51 | 27.9 | |
| Less than six months | 45 | 24.5 | |
| More than two years | 41 | 22.4 | |
| On average, how long does one cartridge (defined as a 60 mL bottle with 3 mg of nicotine) last with you? (N=183) | 0-2 weeks | 27 | 14.7 |
| 2-4 weeks | 41 | 22.4 | |
| 4-6 weeks | 39 | 21.3 | |
| 6-8 weeks | 33 | 18.0 | |
| More than 8 weeks | 43 | 23.5 | |
The frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms is as follows: For the burning feeling behind the breastbone (heartburn), 133 participants (33.0%) experience it 0 days per week, 114 (28.3%) experience it one day per week, 71 (17.6%) experience it two or three days per week, and 85 (21.1%) experience it four to seven days per week. Regarding stomach contents moving up to the throat or mouth (regurgitation), 153 participants (38.0%) experience it 0 days per week, 94 (23.3%) experience it one day per week, 89 (22.1%) experience it two or three days per week, and 67 (16.6%) experience it four to seven days per week. Pain in the middle of the upper stomach area is reported as occurring 0 days per week by 158 participants (39.2%), one day per week by 95 (23.6%), two or three days per week by 93 (23.1%), and four to seven days per week by 57 (14.1%). Nausea occurs 0 days per week for 125 participants (31.0%), one day per week for 110 (27.3%), two or three days per week for 106 (26.3%), and four to seven days per week for 62 (15.4%). Trouble getting a good night's sleep because of heartburn or regurgitation is reported as occurring 0 days per week by 140 participants (34.7%), one day per week by 101 (25.1%), two or three days per week by 98 (24.3%), and four to seven days per week by 64 (15.9%). Lastly, the need for over-the-counter medicine for heartburn or regurgitation, in addition to the prescribed medication (proton pump inhibitors, or PPIs), is reported as occurring 0 days per week by 170 participants (42.2%), one day per week by 85 (21.1%), two or three days per week by 89 (22.1%), and four to seven days per week by 59 (14.6%) (Table 3).
Table 3. Frequency of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Symptoms and Medication Use Per Week.
PPIs: proton pump inhibitors
| 0 days | 1 day | 2 or 3 days | 4 to 7 days | ||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | ||
| How many times does this occur per week? | Burning feeling behind the breastbone (heartburn) | 133 | 33.0 | 114 | 28.3 | 71 | 17.6 | 85 | 21.1 |
| Stomach contents moving up to the throat or mouth (regurgitation) | 153 | 38.0 | 94 | 23.3 | 89 | 22.1 | 67 | 16.6 | |
| Pain in the middle of the upper stomach area | 158 | 39.2 | 95 | 23.6 | 93 | 23.1 | 57 | 14.1 | |
| Nausea | 125 | 31.0 | 110 | 27.3 | 106 | 26.3 | 62 | 15.4 | |
| Trouble getting a good night's sleep because of heartburn or regurgitation | 140 | 34.7 | 101 | 25.1 | 98 | 24.3 | 64 | 15.9 | |
| Need for over-the-counter medicine for heartburn or regurgitation (such as antacids), in addition to the medicine your doctor prescribed (PPIs) | 170 | 42.2 | 85 | 21.1 | 89 | 22.1 | 59 | 14.6 | |
In the analysis of GERD symptoms scores, significant differences were found based on BMI and male gender with a p-value of <0.001, indicating a significant gender-based difference. For BMI categories, individuals classified as extremely obese (BMI >35) have a significant p-value of 0.029. This result highlights that females and individuals with higher BMI categories experience significantly different levels of GERD symptoms (Table 4).
Table 4. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Symptoms Score by Demographic and Health Factors.
* indicates statistically significant values.
| GERD (P-valueK/U) | |||
| Age | 18-20 | 0.105 | |
| 21-23 | |||
| 24-26 | |||
| Older than 26 | |||
| Gender | Female | <0.001* | |
| Male | |||
| Marital status | Married | 0.485 | |
| Single | |||
| BMI | Extremely obese (>35) | 0.029* | |
| Normal (18.5-24.9) | |||
| Obese (30-34.9) | |||
| Overweight (25-29.9) | |||
| Underweight (<18.5) | |||
| University | Al Faisal University | 0.204 | |
| Al-Yamaha University | |||
| Al-Maarifa University | |||
| Arab Open University | |||
| Dar Al Uloom University | |||
| Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University | |||
| Inayah Medical Colleges | |||
| King Saud bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences | |||
| King Saud University | |||
| Prince Sultan University | |||
| Princess Norah Bint Abdul Rahman University | |||
| Riyadh College of Technology - Males | |||
| Riyadh Elm University | |||
| Vision College - Riyadh | |||
| College year | 1st | 0.121 | |
| 2nd | |||
| 3rd | |||
| 4th | |||
| 5th | |||
| 6th | |||
| Do you have any underlying medical problems? | No | 0.117 | |
| Yes | |||
| If yes to the above question please specify | Hypertension | 0.437 | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.667 | ||
| Asthma | 0.683 | ||
| GERD | 0.575 | ||
| Nausea | 0.072 | ||
| Anemia | 0.594 | ||
| Hiatal hernia | 0.241 | ||
| Shortness of breath | 0.072 | ||
| Disc prolapse | 0.348 | ||
| Irritable bowel syndrome | 0.716 | ||
The analysis of GERD symptom scores revealed significant differences associated with smoking and hookah use. Non-smokers have a p-value of 0.001, indicating a significant difference. Among smokers, those who have quit have a significant p-value of 0.001. For daily cigarette consumption, individuals who smoked 21-30 cigarettes have a significant p-value of 0.024. The duration of smoking also affected GERD symptoms, with those who had smoked for less than five years having a p-value of 0.022. Regarding hookah use, users have a p-value of 0.012. Among those who use hookah, those who have quit have a p-value of 0.017 (Table 5).
Table 5. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Symptoms Score by Smoking and Vaping Habits.
* indicates statistically significant values.
| Smoking and Vaping Habits | GERD | |
| P-valueK/U | ||
| Do you smoke tobacco cigarettes? | No | 0.001* |
| Yes | ||
| Do you have a history of smoking tobacco cigarettes? (N=93) | Continue to smoke | 0.001* |
| Quit | ||
| If you are a smoker, how many cigarettes a day did you smoke in the past seven days? (N=93) | 10 cigarettes or less | 0.024* |
| 11-20 | ||
| 21-30 | ||
| 31 and more | ||
| For how long have you smoked? (N=93) | less than 5 years | 0.022* |
| 5-10 years | ||
| 10-15 years | ||
| more than 15 years | ||
| Do you use hookah (sheeshah) or not? | No | 0.012* |
| Yes | ||
| Do you have a history of smoking hookah (sheeshah)? (N=89) | Continue to smoke | 0.017* |
| Quit | ||
| For how long have you smoked hookah (sheeshah)? (N=89) | less than 5 years | 0.057 |
| 5-10 years | ||
| 10-15 years | ||
| more than 15 years | ||
| Do you, or have you at any point previously, used electronic cigarettes (vape)? | Current user | 0.424 |
| Never | ||
| Quit | ||
| How many days per week do you use electronic cigarettes (vape)? (N=183) | 1 day | 0.117 |
| 2-3 days | ||
| 4-7 days | ||
| For how long have you been using electronic cigarettes (vape)? (N=183) | Less than six months | 0.217 |
| From six months to 1 year | ||
| From 1 year to less than 2 years | ||
| More than two years | ||
| On average, how long does one cartridge (defined as a 60 mL bottle with 3 mg of nicotine) last with you? (N=183) | 0-2 weeks | 0.138 |
| 2-4 weeks | ||
| 4-6 weeks | ||
| 6-8 weeks | ||
| More than 8 weeks | ||
Discussion
GERD is a common condition affecting the digestive system, causing symptoms like heartburn, regurgitation, and discomfort, affecting quality of life. Smoking, including e-cigarette use, is known to worsen GERD symptoms. In this study, we examined the prevalence of GERD among university students in Riyadh, focusing on the impact of smoking and e-cigarette use on the frequency and severity of GERD symptoms. The high prevalence of GERD (64.6%) among students with medical issues highlights the importance of understanding the factors that contribute to the condition. This prevalence is higher in a similar study conducted in India, where 25% of students experienced GERD symptoms [13]. This difference may be explained by the higher use of e-cigarettes in our sample, as more than 43% of participants reported vaping. This suggests that e-cigarette use might have a stronger link to GERD in our study group. Smokers, both tobacco and e-cigarette users, had higher GERD symptom scores than non-smokers. This aligns with previous studies, which show that smoking is a major risk factor for GERD due to its effects on the LES, which weakens and allows acid to reflux into the esophagus [14,15].
Individuals who smoked fewer cigarettes reported higher GERD scores compared to those who smoked more. This might be due to increased nicotine sensitivity in light smokers, although more research is needed to confirm this. In terms of gender differences, males had significantly higher GERD symptoms than females. This contrasts with some previous research, where female students were reported to have a higher prevalence of GERD [16]. One possible explanation for this could be lifestyle differences, as male students in our study were more likely to smoke and use e-cigarettes. Additionally, societal pressures and health behaviors may vary between genders in different regions, influencing GERD prevalence. BMI also played a crucial role in the severity of GERD symptoms. Students classified as obese or extremely obese had significantly higher GERD symptom scores than those with a normal BMI. This is consistent with established research that links higher BMI to increased pressure on the stomach, which contributes to acid reflux [17]. Similar findings have been reported in studies from Western populations, where obesity is recognized as a key risk factor for GERD [18].
In our study, even students with a BMI in the overweight category reported higher GERD scores, suggesting that even moderate weight gain could be linked to the onset of GERD symptoms. Health institutions should encourage the population to start following a healthy diet program with exercise. Participants who had been smoking for fewer than five years reported higher GERD symptom scores compared to long-term smokers. This might seem counterintuitive, but it could indicate that newer smokers experience more pronounced effects on the LES, or that long-term smokers may have adapted to some symptoms over time. Further investigation is required to better understand this phenomenon. The use of e-cigarettes, or vaping, was widespread among the students, with 43.7% of participants reporting current use. Vapers had significantly higher GERD symptom scores than non-vapers, supporting previous studies that have linked vaping to an increased risk of GERD [19,20]. Vaping liquids contain nicotine and other chemicals that can relax the LES, leading to acid reflux. This finding is particularly important because e-cigarettes are often marketed as a safer alternative to traditional smoking, but the impact on GERD shows that vaping may have similar or worse effects on digestive health [21]. The frequency of e-cigarette use was another key factor in GERD symptoms. Students who vaped more frequently (four to seven days per week) reported higher GERD scores compared to those who used e-cigarettes less often. This suggests a dose-response relationship, where increased exposure to vaping chemicals results in more severe GERD symptoms. These findings align with research indicating that nicotine exposure from any source is harmful to the digestive system [22]. In terms of lifestyle habits, participants who used hookah (sheeshah) had higher GERD symptom scores than non-users. Hookah use is prevalent in many parts of the world, including Saudi Arabia, and similar to cigarette smoking, it affects the LES and increases the risk of acid reflux. Our study’s findings match those of previous research, which identified a strong correlation between hookah use and GERD symptoms [23]. Students who had quit smoking or vaping had lower GERD scores compared to current users, which supports the idea that cessation can lead to improvements in GERD symptoms. Studies show that quitting smoking helps the LES recover its function, reducing the frequency and severity of acid reflux. This reinforces the importance of smoking cessation programs for students, as it not only benefits respiratory and cardiovascular health but also digestive health. We also observed a significant relationship between academic year and GERD symptoms, with third- and fourth-year students reporting higher scores. One possible explanation is the increased academic stress during these years, which could exacerbate GERD symptoms. Stress is known to increase stomach acid production and lower LES pressure, making it a contributing factor to GERD [24]. This finding suggests that psychological factors may also play a role in the prevalence of GERD among students. Among students with pre-existing medical conditions, GERD was the most common issue. Conditions like hiatal hernia, asthma, and diabetes are known to increase the risk of GERD. The high prevalence of GERD among students with these conditions suggests that proper management of these medical issues is important for reducing GERD symptoms. The high prevalence of GERD among young adults, particularly university students, points to a growing public health concern. GERD can significantly impact quality of life, leading to sleep disturbances, poor academic performance, and reduced overall well-being.
Our study highlights the need for interventions aimed at reducing smoking and vaping among students, as well as raising awareness about the risk factors for GERD. The study was limited by an online questionnaire, not able to reach all students nor all universities in Riyadh city.
Conclusions
GERD is common among university students in Riyadh, especially those who smoke cigarettes or use e-cigarettes. The majority of students with medical problems had GERD and smoking behaviors strongly affected the severity of GERD symptoms. Males were more affected by GERD than females, and newer smokers reported worse symptoms than long-term smokers. It highlights the need for public health campaigns to reduce smoking and vaping among young adults. Promoting healthier lifestyles and increasing awareness about the risks of GERD, especially for smokers and vapers, can help lower its prevalence and improve students’ quality of life. Further research is needed to understand the long-term effects of vaping on GERD. There should be anti-vaping campaigns targeted at young adults and educational programs in universities.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Research Ethics Committee of Al-Maarifa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia issued approval IRB24-072.
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Abdulrahman Hussamuldin, Waqar Farooqi, Abdulaziz Albatati, Fahda S. Alshathri, Abdulrahman Alzuhair, Sultan Alabdullah, Abdullah Alabdullah
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Abdulrahman Hussamuldin, Waqar Farooqi, Abdulaziz Albatati, Fahda S. Alshathri, Abdulrahman Alzuhair, Sultan Alabdullah, Abdullah Alabdullah
Drafting of the manuscript: Abdulrahman Hussamuldin, Waqar Farooqi, Abdulaziz Albatati, Fahda S. Alshathri, Abdulrahman Alzuhair, Sultan Alabdullah, Abdullah Alabdullah
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Abdulrahman Hussamuldin, Waqar Farooqi, Abdulaziz Albatati, Fahda S. Alshathri, Abdulrahman Alzuhair, Sultan Alabdullah, Abdullah Alabdullah
References
- 1.E-cigarette use among medical students at Qassim University: knowledge, perception, and prevalence. Almutham A, Altami M, Sharaf F, AlAraj A. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_567_19. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:2921–2926. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_567_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oral hygiene practices, smoking habit, and self-perceived oral malodor among dental students. Almas K, Al-Hawish A, Al-Khamis W. https://www.thejcdp.com/doi/pdf/10.5005/jcdp-4-4-77. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003;4:77–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smoking habits among pharmacy students at a University in central Saudi Arabia. Al-Arifi MN. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15951896/ Saudi Med J. 2005;26:893–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Welch A, Ahmed W. What is Gerd? Symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. [ Sep; 2024 ]. 2023. https://www.everydayhealth.com/gerd/guide/ https://www.everydayhealth.com/gerd/guide/
- 5.Perceptions related to use of electronic cigarettes among California college students. Abadi S, Couch ET, Chaffee BW, Walsh MM. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29118149/ J Dent Hyg. 2017;91:35–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.A review of toxic effects of electronic cigarettes/vaping in adolescents and young adults. Overbeek DL, Kass AP, Chiel LE, Boyer EW, Casey AM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2020.1794443. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2020;50:531–538. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1794443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Electronic cigarettes: a new nicotine gateway? Grana RA. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:135–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Electronic cigarette among health science students in Saudi Arabia. Qanash S, Alemam S, Mahdi E, Softah J, Touman AA, Alsulami A. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/atm.ATM_76_18. Ann Thorac Med. 2019;14:56–62. doi: 10.4103/atm.ATM_76_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Saudi Arabia. Alsuwat OB, Alzahrani AA, Alzhrani MA, Alkhathami AM, Mahfouz ME. http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3292w. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10:221–225. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3292w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Correlation between symptom severity and health-related life quality of a population with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Lee SW, Lee TY, Lien HC, Peng YC, Yeh HJ, Chang CS. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5412539/ Gastroenterology Res. 2017;10:78–83. doi: 10.14740/gr753w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.From reflux esophagitis to Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Wang RH. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:5210–5219. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Prevalence of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) among electronic cigarette-smoking university students in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Alturki NA, Alghamdi RA, Almehmadi RG, et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35890. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Prevalence and the risk factors of gastro-esophageal reflux disease in medical students. Sharma A, Sharma PK, Puri P. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.005. Med J Armed Forces India. 2018;74:250–254. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a population-based study. Sadafi S, Azizi A, Pasdar Y, Shakiba E, Darbandi M. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-024-03143-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024;24:64. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03143-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cigarette smoking and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Kahrilas PJ. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000171345. Dig Dis. 1992;10:61–71. doi: 10.1159/000171345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Studying the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease among Syrians private university students: a cross-sectional study [PREPRINT] Shammout M, Haddad S, Hanna M, Martini N, Almasri I-A, Sara S. http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3991718/v2 Research Square. 2024 [Google Scholar]
- 17.GERD and obesity: a real BIG issue! Vaezi MF. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.049. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:882–883. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Obesity and GERD. Chang P, Friedenberg F. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2013.11.009. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014;43:161–173. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dual use of e-cigarettes with conventional tobacco is associated with increased sleep latency in cross-sectional Study. Advani I, Gunge D, Boddu S, et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06445-8. Sci Rep. 2022;12:2536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06445-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.The association between the pattern of electronic cigarette smoking and gastroesophageal reflux. Zein AFMZ, Nauphar D, Khasanah U, Pratamawati TM, Brajawikalpa RS, Ayuningtyas E. Indones J Gastroenterol Hepatol Dig Endosc. 2021;22:16–20. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Health outcomes of electronic cigarettes. Li X, Yuan L, Wang F. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000003098. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024;137:1903–1911. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harmful effects of nicotine. Mishra A, Chaturvedi P, Datta S, Sinukumar S, Joshi P, Garg A. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015;36:24–31. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.151771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.The association between waterpipe smoking and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Etemadi A, Gandomkar A, Freedman ND, et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx158. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:1968–1977. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.The association between symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and perceived stress: a countrywide study of Sri Lanka. Wickramasinghe N, Thuraisingham A, Jayalath A, Wickramasinghe D, Samarasekara N, Yazaki E, Devanarayana NM. PLoS One. 2023;18:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
