Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research logoLink to Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research
. 2024 Nov 20;29(6):660–668. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_27_23

How to Engage Men in Preconception Health?: A Scoping Review

Silvia A Agustina 1,2,, Yayi S Prabandari 3,4, Mohammad Hakimi 5, Elli N Hayati 6
PMCID: PMC11694592  PMID: 39759910

Abstract

Background:

Men’s engagement in maternal and child health care in the preconception health forum is essential because it allows primary prevention of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity. This review aimed to identify strategies to engage men in preconception health.

Materials and Methods:

This scoping review was conducted from August to September 2022. The database searches included PubMed, EBSCO, and ProQuest from 2012 to 2022, related to men’s involvement in reproductive health, preconception health, family planning, maternity, and infant care; articles written in English; national (Indonesia) and international articles; and appropriate thesis. The searched keywords were man/male role, premarital, preconception, reproductive health, and fertility.

Results:

The electronic searches turned to 1969 articles, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria and were selected for study analysis. This review identified three themes: identifying programs that are sensitive to the limitations of men; developing community outreach strategies; and engaging management principles, policy, and legislation.

Conclusions:

Efforts to engage men in preconception health can be complicated, but several strategic programs have demonstrated some success. Subsequent programs that require men’s participation in preconception health services must be sensitive to the identified barriers.

Keywords: Engagement, men, preconception care

Introduction:

Preconception health is crucial in pregnancy outcomes and the long-term health of children and future generations.[1] Besides, premarital screening has reduced the prevalence of genetic blood disorders (sickle cell anemia, thalassemia) and infectious diseases (hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome).[2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] The ultimate objective is to improve maternal and child health outcomes. Preconception care encompasses the time before the first pregnancy and between subsequent pregnancies.[10] The purpose of preconception services is not only to improve the health of prospective mothers but also to engage prospective fathers. In addition, involving men in their partner’s reproductive decision is also essential for achieving reproductive health indicators.[11] It is necessary to prepare married couples with healthy reproductive lives so that they can have a healthy pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and breastfeeding period and produce healthy offspring for the next generation.[12]

The high maternal mortality rate in developing countries is partly influenced by local sociocultural factors. Pregnancy, childbirth, and childcare are considered to be women’s responsibilities. Hence, the impacts include a low level of men’s engagement in women’s health issues (45%).[13] Men’s engagement in maternal health care is when a male partner provides emotional and physical support to a woman while actively participating in making decisions together.[14] Women who receive support from their spouse during pregnancy and breastfeeding will feel empowered to reduce stress and difficulties during the perinatal period.[15]

Men and women are equally important to preconception health, given their respective roles in the reproductive health,[16] and men are viewed as playing a crucial role. Most maternal and child health professionals consider how men can support the health of their partner and children. However, it is difficult to involve men in reproductive health issues (especially preconception health). It requires political, programmatic, and professional struggles.[17] Currently, the number of studies on changing cultural perspectives involving men in reproductive health and child development is expanding, for example, studies conducted by Pokhrel et al., Nesane et al., Ongolly et al., Firouzan et al., Craymah et al., Shand and Marcell, and Davis et al.[18,19,20,21,22,23,24] However, to the best of researchers’ knowledge, there is still limited research on scoping review on how to engage men in reproductive health. Knowing various efforts to engage men in reproductive health, it is hoped to become a discourse for healthcare professionals and stakeholders in making decisions for program development. This scoping review contributes to identifying how men can be involved in preconception health.

Materials and Methods

This scoping review was conducted from August to September 2022. Inclusion criteria for this study: 1) publications in the last 10 years (2012–2022); 2) articles written in English; 3) national (Indonesia) and international articles; 4) related to men’s involvement in health reproduction, health preconception, family planning, maternity, and infant care; and 5) appropriate theses. Articles that do not contain information about preconception health, animal research, study protocol, and an opinion are excluded from this study.

An electronic search was conducted using PubMed, EBSCO, and ProQuest. The documents (articles and theses) were selected based on the inclusion criteria and followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol to report the findings.[25] Keywords used to find articles related to identifying how men can be involved in preconception health are attached in Table 1.

Table 1.

Keywords of searches

Elements Keywords
Population (Man role) OR (male role) OR (premarital role) OR (couple role) OR (boyfriend role) OR (paternal role) (Man contribut*) OR (male contribut*) OR (couple contribut*) OR (boyfriend contribut*) OR (paternal contribut*)
AND
Exposure/Intervention (healthy reproductive) OR (healthy preconception) OR (healthy pregnancy) OR (health) OR (participation improve*)
AND
Outcome (preconception) OR (reproductive health) OR (prepregnan*) OR (fertility) OR (premarital)
NOT
infertility
NOT
adolescen*
NOT
diabet*
NOT
Cancer
NOT
animal*

The first author (SAA) conducted the article search and discovered duplicates by using the reference manager (using Zotero). The process continued to select the eligible criteria by SAA and ENH. Furthermore, all authors (SAA, YSP, MH, and ENH) as independent auditors or subject matter experts evaluated the quality of the preceding articles/publications using The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), providing evaluation instruments. The relevant paper titles, abstracts, and complete texts were evaluated sequentially. Data extraction was done by analyzing data based on the authors’ name, title, samples, level of evidence, location, and key finding.

Ethical considerations

The researchers consistently maintained impartiality in analyzing the data gathered from the articles, upholding ethical standards throughout the study. This research received approval from the Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia, under project code KE/FK/1019/EC/2022, issued August 2, 2022. The authors actively work to prevent any form of redundant publication and plagiarism. They reported the findings of their analysis with complete integrity, without falsifying or altering data for personal advantages.

Results

The literature search generated 1969 articles, with 55 duplicates removed, resulting in 1.914 articles for title and abstract screening [Figure 1]. After the initial screening, we excluded 1824 articles based on the study criteria and left 90 for the full-text review. Finally, we got 16 included articles to extract. Excluded articles following this stage were about antenatal, prenatal, and postnatal periods; animal research; transgender; HIV; children; partner violence; research protocol; did not discuss men’s involvement; and opinion articles.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA diagram of the study selection[25]. SHAPE \* MERGEFORMAT SHAPE \* MERGEFORMAT

The data extraction is shown in Table 2. As many as 16 publications included articles that addressed attitudes toward men participation in preconception health. The ages of the sample populations ranged from 15 to 80 years old. Studies were conducted in predominantly rural areas across four continents (Asia, Africa, America, and Australia). The studies reviewed consist of six qualitative studies, eight quantitative studies, and two review studies. We conducted a qualitative content analysis by identifying the characteristics of the message content in each article and obtaining the themes [Table 3]. Three major themes were identified: identifying the programs that are sensitive to males’ limitations; developing community outreach strategies; and engaging management principles, policy, and legislation.

Table 2.

Summary of reviewed articles

Author, year Title Sample Level of Evidence Location Key findings
Adongo et al., 2013[26] The Role of CHPS* Strategy in Involving Males in The Provision of Family Planning Services: A Qualitative Study in Southern Ghana 48 females and 42 males. All participants were married and had between 2–5 children. The age distribution of participants was between 18–59 years. Qualitative descriptive study Rural Northern Ghana The CHPS strategy was perceived as very helpful. Males were more involved in family planning services in communities with functioning CHPS’s door to door strategy.
Jooste, K and Amukugo, HJ, 2013[27] Male Involvement in RH**: A Management Perspective 10 individual interviews: four male partners, three female partners and three nurse managers. A qualitative exploratory Northern region of Namibia The management principles, policy, and legislation, as well as resources to facilitate male involvement in RH, were indicated as barriers for nurse managers to facilitate male involvement.
Schuler et al., 2015[28] Interactive Workshops to Promote Gender Equity and Family Planning in Rural Communities of Guatemala: Results of a Community Randomized Study. Males and females. Mean age 31 years (intervention group) and 29 years (control group). The mean number of living children per couple was 3.0 (intervention group) and 2.2 (control group). A Community Randomized Study Rural Guatemala The intervention showed statistically significant effects on two of the three outcomes examined: gender attitudes and contraceptive knowledge.
Msovela, J and Tengia-Kessy, A, 2016[29] Implementation and acceptability of strategies instituted for engaging men in family planning services in Kibaha district, Tanzania. As many as 365 of currently married or cohabiting men had at least one child under the age of five years. Mixed method design Rural and urban Kibaha district, Tanzania Strategies to engage men in family planning services: invitations through their spouses, verbally or by using partner notification cards, family planning messages during monthly meetings, and community outreach through reproductive health programs.
Mkandawire, E and Hendriks, SL, 2018[30] A qualitative analysis of men’s involvement in maternal and child health as a policy intervention in rural Central Malawi Total 63 participants (26 were informants and 37 were community members). The majority of participants were women (n=44). The age of participants ranging from 19 to 80 years. A qualitative study Rural Malawi Five themes facilitate men’s involvement: men’s recognition of the benefits of participation; pride; advocacy; incentives and disincentives by health care providers and Traditional Authorities; and encouragement from male champions.
Sharma S, Kc Bhuvan, Khatri A, 2018[31] Factors Influencing Male Participation in Reproductive Health: A Qualitative Study FGDs***: male teachers in two schools (Secondary School and Higher Secondary School) of Bungamati, Lalitpur. In-depth interviews: seven key informants of the health facility. A qualitative study Rural Bungamati, Nepal Perceived motivating factors: positive attitudes in men, literacy, awareness, the inclusion of reproductive health in the school curriculum, and incentives.
Speizeret al., 2018[32] Association of men’s exposure to family planning programming and reported discussion with partner and family planning use: The case of urban Senegal. Men aged 15–59 years A cross-sectional survey Urban Senegal Men who were exposed to a religious leader speaking favorably about FP**** were more likely to report using FP and discussing FP with their spouse. Radio activities were associated with FP discussion and television exposure was associated with FP use. There was an association between community-based activities and these outcomes.
Hogg et al., 2019[33] Men’s Preconception Health Care in Australian General Practice: GPs***** Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors. 304 GPs Survey Urban, rural, and remote Australia To facilitate discussions about fertility or preconception health, it needed trustworthy websites and factsheets.
Nkwonta CA and Messias DKH, 2019[34] Male Participation in Reproductive Health Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review. Articles from Google Scholar and PubMed search engines; the ScienceDirect search interface; and the MEDLINE******, Global Health, PsycINFO******* and CINAHL********. A Scoping Review Sub-Saharan Africa Interventions engaged participants by using such strategies as community health workers, written invitation, peers, community or religious leaders and media campaigns.
Endut et al., 2020[35] The Influence of Men’s Masculine Gender-Role Attitude and Behavior on Sexual Relationships and Reproductive Health in Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study. 168 men of ages 20–64years Cross-sectional study Urban Malaysia Men’s traditional behavior and controlling nature are positively associated with the inequality in sexual relationships and reproductive health.
Burns et al., 2021[36] Engaging Young Black Males in SRH******** Care: A Review of the Literature. Articles from CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Scopus online data bases. Review Online databases. The facilitators for utilizing SRH care: health clinic engagement, social support, access to quality health care, and trust in the health care system and providers.
Kengne-Nde et al., 2021[37] COC********* Improves Male Partner Involvement in Sexual and Reproductive Health of a Couple: Evidence from the ANRS PRENAHTEST randomized trial 484 pregnant women enrolled with an age median of 27 years. 55.23% of respondents had a gestational age greater than 16 weeks at ANC-1**********, and HIV*********** (11.9%). Randomized prenatest multicentric trial Urban Cameroon, Dominican Republic, Georgia and India The partners of the women who participated in the COC were more likely to be involved during follow-up than others.
Lusambili et al., 2021[38] Male Involvement in RMNCH************: An Evaluative Qualitative Study on Facilitators and Barriers from Rural Kenya. Ten FGDs and 11 key informant interviews. Key informants were males and females at the county, subcounty, and health facility levels. A qualitative study Rural Kisii and Kilifi counties, Kenya Effective male engagement when delivered by male authority figures such as church leaders, male champions, and teachers. Suboptimal male engagement arises from tensions men face indirectly contributing to the household economy and participating in RMNCH activities.
McLean, KE; Thulin, EJ, 2022[39] “If the Woman Doesn’t Prevent, You Will Become Pregnant”: Exploring Male Involvement in Contraceptive Use Preceding Unplanned Pregnancy in Sierra Leone As many as 106 fathers between the ages of 18–39 years. Qualitative research Rural and urban Kono District of eastern Sierra Leone Barriers for men’s participation in family planning: inadequate knowledge about contraception, poor access to services, and gender norms that consider family planning a woman’s responsibility.
Diamond-Smith et al., 2022[40] The Development and Feasibility of a Group-Based Household-Level Intervention to Improve Preconception Nutrition in Nawalparasi District of Nepal In-depth interviews: newly married women, their husband, and mothers-in-law (n=60). A longitudinal study (18 months): 200 newly married women. A pilot intervention: 90 participants. Mixed methods study Rural Nawalparasi district of Nepal Participants felt the program impacted their lives by strengthening relationships and trust, understanding each other, and changing behaviors.
Cockcroft et al., 2022[41] A Universal Home Visits Improve Male Knowledge and Attitudes about Maternal and Child Health in Bauchi State, Nigeria: Secondary Outcome Analysis of a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. 6931 men were involved in the intervention group and 9434 men in the control group. Secondary outcome analysis of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Urban and rural Bauchi State, Nigeria Universal home visits improved knowledge of male spouses about maternal and child health, which could contribute to improve maternal and child outcomes.

* CHPS=Community-Based Health Planning and Services. **RH=Reproductive Health. ***FGDs=Focus Group Discussions. ****FP=Family Planning. *****GPs=general practitioners. ******MEDLINE=Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online. *******PsycINFO=Psychological Information. ********CINAHL=Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. *********SRH=Sexual and Reproductive Health. **********COC=Couple Oriented Counselling. ***********ANC-1=The first Antenatal Care. ************HIV=Human Immunodeficiency Virus. *************RMNCH=Reproductive and Maternal and New Child Health

Table 3.

Result synthesis

Similar articles published in the journal Finding Theme
Lusambili et al., 2021[38]; McLean and Thulin, 2022[39]; Endut et al., 2020[35]; Sharma et al. 2018[31]; Hogg et al., 2019[33]; Mkandawire and Hendriks, 2018[30]; Burns et al., 2021[36] The review results found that a program that can reach male participation must pay attention to the limitations of their experience in society, such as stigma, masculinity, taboo, and opportunity cost. Identifying programs that are sensitive to male limitations
Lusambili et al., 2021[38]; Hogg et al., 2019[33]; Burns et al., 2021,[36] Mkandawire and Hendriks 2018[30]; Adongo et al., 2013[26]; Cockcroft et al., 2022[41]; Diamond-Smith et al., 2022[40]; Nkwonta and Messias, 2019[34]; Speizer et al., 2018[32]; Kengne-Nde et al., 2021[37]; Schuler et al., 2015[28]; Msovela and Tengia-Kessy 2016[29] Some strategies implemented to encourage male involvement in preconception health were through a home visit strategy, involving key persons, online media, interactive workshops, and invitations. Developing strategies to outreach the community
Mkandawire and Hendriks 2018[30]; Jooste and Amukugo 2013[27] Management, policy, and legislation were needed to encourage male involvement in preconception health. Engaging management principles, policy, and legislation

Identifying the programs that are sensitive to males’ limitations

The suboptimal male involvement in health reproductive can be attributed to several factors, including household economic problems, feminization, and stigma related to reproductive as well as mother and child health activities[38] or gender norms that consider reproductive health as women’s responsibility[39]; masculinity[35]; knowledge[39,31]; education; attitude; male consciousness; sociocultural, psychological, and health system factors; and inadequate access to services.[39] In addition, men are usually less receptive to advice regarding fertility or health preconception when receiving services from a general practitioner.[33]

Developing strategies to outreach the community

The home visit strategy is an effective method for engaging men in preconception health. One of them is the Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) strategy of providing family planning health information door-to-door in an effort to alter men’s perceptions of family planning and contraceptive use.[26] According to other sources, home visits can increase men’s knowledge about maternal and child health, thereby contributing to the improvement of maternal and child health.[41]

Another strategy to increase men engagement is involving key figures in society, such as policymakers,[40] male champions[30] or some kind of health care,[34] teachers,[38] and religious leaders[32,34,38] through the dissemination of preconception health information on media (television, radio) or religious dialogs.[32,34] In addition, there is evidence that sexuality programs that involve partners through Couple Oriented Counseling (COC) activities are effective at increasing men involvement.[37]

The literature review conducted by Burns et al.[36] revealed that social support, health worker engagement, access to quality health care, and trust in the health care provider system facilitate men’s engagement in sexual reproductive health. Pride is also one of the factors that facilitate men participation. Men are proud when they are motivated by health visits from the government or when they are involved in identifying healthy children in their community.[30]

The interactive workshop had a significant effect on gender attitudes. The participant’s enthusiasm showed the community-level social and behavior change communication strategy addressing gender norms in the area of sexuality and family planning effectively.[28] Inviting men to participate in preconception health services through their partners, either verbally or with notification cards, and incorporating preconception health socialization into monthly meetings are also effective strategies.[29]

Engaging management principles, policy, and legislation

The perceived barriers facilitating men involvement in sexual health are related to service management principles, policies, laws, and health resources.[27] Policymakers and legislators need to be more aware that gender dynamics have changed. The involvement in maternal and child health activities is needed not only by women; men also play a significant role in this process. By considering men’s roles, the perceived barriers facilitating men involvement in sexual health are related to service management principles and policies.[30]

Incentives and disincentives are cited as drivers of men participation in maternal and child health by hospitals and traditional authorities. A system of incentives and disincentives is implemented to encourage men to accompany their partners to antenatal care visits. Women who present to antenatal care with their partners will get the first services. If the pregnant woman attends antenatal care without a partner, she will either receive the last service or not receive it until they return with their partner. However, this system reaps the pros and cons related to patient queue discrimination.[30]

Discussion

This scoping review aimed to identify the strategy to engage men in preconception health. We identified three themes regarding how to engage males in preconception healthy: identifying the programs that are sensitive to males’ limitations; developing strategies to outreach the community; and engaging management principles, policy, and legislation.

According to studies, the dominant culture in society continues to adhere to masculine characteristics and unfair gender norms.[16] According to the literature, traditional patriarchal cultural values regarding masculinity, male dominance over women, and gender inequality endanger women’s reproductive health.[42,43,44] Men’s reproductive health service programs should improve the quality of respect, service options, confidentiality, and compassion.[36] The lack of options in health services is caused by the prevalence information aimed at women.[30] A similar result was shown by Endut’s research, which discussed the importance of considering the traditional view of masculinity when involving men in matters relating in sexual and reproductive health.[35] According to another study, the majority of men are reluctant to visit a health clinic due to opportunity costs. They will have to sacrifice time and abandon their primary source of family income.[30] Several approach strategies that involve the community can be a discourse in reducing the limitations of men on their role in reproductive health.

The results of other studies also mention that having a “Male Champion” or a distinct man as a healthcare provider can increase men’s participation in preconception health efforts. They are responsible for conveying the message of “safe motherhood” to men in a community as well as facilitating the participation of men.[30,45] Sexuality health issues, which are still considered taboo,[30,46] require these health care to carry out door-to-door visits discreetly and encourage men to be involved in maternal and child health and attend reproductive care.[30] Peer support is necessary to encourage men involvement in preconception health.[34] This is also expressed by Moyo et al.,[47] who highlighted how the use of preconception health campaigns through male peers could encourage other men to visit reproductive health clinics.

Online media such as trusted websites become recommendations for General Practitioners (GPs) in discussing preconception health issues (fertility) with men. According to a study of GPs, it was found that the majority of general practitioners (90%) were unsure of their knowledge of the factors that affect male fertility. Lack of knowledge and male sensitivity and the perception that preconception health (fertility) is women’s issue were identified as barriers to preventing male patients from discussing fertility and preconception health with their general practitioners. They planned to use credible websites and fact sheets as discussion forums to bridge this gap.[33]

Dukes and Palm advocate for policy and system-level changes in the context of reproductive justice and support for young fathers, such as early intervention; adoption of a diverse family systems perspective; a continuum of parent education and support services that include fathers; and collaboration between service sectors. Efforts at early intervention capitalize on the receptivity and motivation of young men during the transition to fatherhood.[48] Additionally, it increases paternal capacity and participation during a time of vulnerability for both mother and child.[49,50]

Regarding all the results, this study revealed that the majority of the reproductive health programs are held in low-middle-income countries; the reproductive health gap between developed and developing countries remains very large. According to research by Pillai et al.,[51] existing approaches to enhancing reproductive health in developing countries prioritize economic and social development. The increase in income brought about by economic development in developing nations has been shown to be a significant factor in enhancing public health, including reproductive health. Social institutions play a crucial role in translating economic gains into reproductive health improvement through health services expansion, such as prenatal care, immunization, and nutrition education. Generally, research shows that economic development has direct and indirect effects on reproductive health through social enhancement.

The authors acknowledge that this scoping review has limited the database. Several reputable journal databases, including ISI (Institute for Scientific Information), have yet to be utilized. It may result in the omission of articles exclusive to this database. Limitations also occurred in English language publications. It may exclude men’s engagement in preconception health strategies published in journals other than English. Despite having limitations, this research has strengths, particularly in its systematic search system based on PRISMA guidelines, using keywords designed to be as sensitive as possible to capture data and having the results reviewed by more than one reviewer. Furthermore, the findings of this study could be beneficial as guidance for healthcare professionals and stakeholders to enhance men’s involvement in reproductive health.

Conclusion

Efforts to involve men in preconception health are complicated. Various strategies were conducted by socializing preconception health to the community, house visits involving key figures, using online media, interactive workshops, and invitations. Subsequent programs requiring men’s participation in preconception health should be sensitive to the obstacles encountered by the earlier programs.

Conflicts of interest

Nothing to declare.

Acknowledgments

Our thanks go to the Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada; the LPDP (Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan)/Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education; Doctoral Program Supervisors; and the authors of all of the articles that were used for this review (20201221085648).

Funding Statement

Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan/Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education

References

  • 1.Stephenson J, Heslehurst N, Hall J, Schoenaker DAJM, Hutchinson J, Cade JE, et al. Before the beginning: Nutrition and lifestyle in the preconception period and its importance for future health. Lancet. 2018;391:1830–41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30311-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alhosain A. Premarital screening programs in the Middle East, from a human right’s perspective. Divers Equal Health Care. 2018:15. Available from: http://diversityhealthcare.imedpub.com/premarital-screening-programs-in-the-middle-east-from-a-human-rights-perspective.php?aid=22083 . [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aljumah A, Abaalkhail F, Al-Ashgar H, Assiri A, Babatin M, Al-Faleh F, et al. Epidemiology, disease burden, and treatment strategies of chronic hepatitis C virus infections in Saudi Arabia in the new treatment paradigm shift. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:269. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.187609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barmania S, Aljunid SM. Premarital HIV testing in Malaysia: A qualitative exploratory study on the views of major stakeholders involved in HIV prevention. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017;17:12. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0120-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bener A, Al-Mulla M, Clarke A. Premarital screening and genetic counseling program: Studies from an endogamous population. Int J App Basic Med Res. 2019;9:20. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_42_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gosadi IM. National screening programs in Saudi Arabia: Overview, outcomes, and effectiveness. J Infect Public Health. 2019;12:608–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.He J, Song W, Yang J, Lu S, Yuan Y, Guo J, et al. Next-generation sequencing improves thalassemia carrier screening among premarital adults in a high prevalence population: The Dai nationality, China. Genet Med. 2017;19:1022–31. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hiebert L, Hecht R, Soe-Lin S, Mohamed R, Shabaruddin FH, Syed Mansor SM, et al. A stepwise approach to a national hepatitis C screening strategy in Malaysia to meet the WHO 2030 targets: Proposed strategy, coverage, and costs. Value Health Reg Issues. 2019;18:112–20. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Serjeant GR, Serjeant BE, Mason KP, Gibson F, Gardner R, Warren L, et al. Voluntary premarital screening to prevent sickle cell disease in Jamaica: Does it work? J Community Genet. 2017;8:133–9. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0294-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mason E, Chandra-Mouli V, Baltag V, Christiansen C, Lassi ZS, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: Advancing from ‘important to do and can be done’ to ‘is being done and is making a difference. ’ Reprod Health. 2014;11:S8. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anbesu EW, Aychiluhm SB, Kahsay ZH. Male involvement in family planning use and its determinants in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev. 2022;11:19. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01891-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Apriyanti Mampukah Program Kesehatan Reproduksi Bagi Calon Pengantin (Catin) Menurunkan Angka Kematian Ibu ? Infokes. 2019 Available from: https://infokes.dinus.ac.id/2019/ 11/14/mampukah-program-kesehatan-reproduksi-bagi-calon-pengantin-catin-menurunkan-angka-kematian-ibu/ . [Last accessed on 2021 Jul 02] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Widiantari NKN, Suariyani NLP, Karmaya INM. Hubungan Karakteristik Sosio Demografi dan Dukungan Sosial Suami dengan Partisipasi Ibu Mengikuti Kelas Ibu Hamil. Public Health Prev Med Arch. 2016;4:54–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Galle A, Plaieser G, Van Steenstraeten T, Griffin S, Osman NB, Roelens K, et al. Systematic review of the concept ‘male involvement in maternal health’ by natural language processing and descriptive analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e004909. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004909. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Atashi V, Kohan S, Salehi Z, Salehi K. Maternal-fetal emotional relationship during pregnancy, its related factors and outcomes in Iranian pregnant women: A panel study protocol. Reprod Health. 2018;15:176. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0620-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roudsari RL, Sharifi F, Goudarzi F. Barriers to the participation of men in reproductive health care: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15692-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kotelchuck M, Lu M. Father’s role in preconception health. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21:2025–39. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pokhrel KN, Thakuri DS, Dagadu NA, Balami R, Sharma M, Bhandari R. Unlocking the potential for engaging men to improve reproductive, maternal, and neonatal health in Karnali Province, Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:2094. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14534-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Craymah JP, Oppong RK, Tuoyire DA. Male involvement in maternal health care at Anomabo, Central Region, Ghana. Int J Reprod Med. 2017;2017:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2017/2929013. doi: 10.1155/2017/2929013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shand T, Marcell AV. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health. Oxford University Press; 2021. Engaging men in sexual and reproductive health. Available from: https://oxfordre.com/publichealth/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.001.0001/acrefore-9780190632366-e-215 . [Last accessed on 2022 Nov 29] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Davis J, Vyankandondera J, Luchters S, Simon D, Holmes W. Male involvement in reproductive, maternal and child health: A qualitative study of policymaker and practitioner perspectives in the Pacific. Reprod Health. 2016;13:81. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0184-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Firouzan V, Noroozi M, Farajzadegan Z, Mirghafourvand M. Barriers to men’s participation in perinatal care: A qualitative study in Iran. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:45. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2201-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ongolly FK, Bukachi SA. Barriers to men’s involvement in antenatal and postnatal care in Butula, western Kenya. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019;11:e1–7. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nesane K, Maputle SM, Shilubane H. Male partners’ views of involvement in maternal healthcare services at Makhado Municipality clinics, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2016;8:e1–5. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v8i2.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adongo PB, Tapsoba P, Phillips JF, Tabong PTN, Stone A, Kuffour E, et al. The role of community-based health planning and services strategy in involving males in the provision of family planning services: A qualitative study in Southern Ghana. Reprod Health. 2013;10:36. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-36. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jooste K, Amukugo HJ. Male involvement in reproductive health: A management perspective: Transition support. J Nurs Manag. 2013;21:327–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01332.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schuler SR, Nanda G, Ramírez LF, Chen M. Interactive workshops to promote gender equity and family planning in rural communities of guatemala: Results of a community randomized study. J Biosoc Sci. 2015;47:667–86. doi: 10.1017/S0021932014000418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Msovela J, Tengia–Kessy A. Implementation and acceptability of strategies instituted for engaging men in family planning services in Kibaha district, Tanzania. Reprod Health. 2016;13:138. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0253-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mkandawire E, Hendriks SL. A qualitative analysis of men’s involvement in maternal and child health as a policy intervention in rural Central Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:37. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1669-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sharma S, Kc B, Khatri A. Factors influencing male participation in reproductive health: A qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:601–8. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S176267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Speizer IS, Corroon M, Calhoun LM, Gueye A, Guilkey DK. Association of men’s exposure to family planning programming and reported discussion with partner and family planning use: The case of urban Senegal. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0204049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hogg K, Rizio T, Manocha R, McLachlan RI, Hammarberg K. Men’s preconception health care in Australian general practice: GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. Aust J Prim Health. 2019;25:353. doi: 10.1071/PY19069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nkwonta CA, Messias DKH. Male participation in reproductive health interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Int Perspect Sexual Reprod Health. 2019;45:71. doi: 10.1363/45e8119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Endut N, Bagheri R, Azwan Azmawati A, Hashimah Mohd Hashim I, Hafizah Selamat N, Mohajer L. The influence of men’s masculine gender-role attitude and behaviour on sexual relationships and reproductive health in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2021;19:663–70. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i7.9477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Burns JC, Reeves J, Calvert WJ, Adams M, Ozuna-Harrison R, Smith MJ, et al. Engaging young black males in sexual and reproductive health care: A review of the literature. Am J Mens Health. 2021;15:155798832110620. doi: 10.1177/15579883211062024. doi: 10.1177/15579883211062024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kengne-Nde C, Tejiokem MC, Orne-Gliemann J, Melingui B, Koki Ndombo P, Essounga NA, et al. Couple oriented counselling improves male partner involvement in sexual and reproductive health of a couple: Evidence from the ANRS PRENAHTEST randomized trial. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0255330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0255330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lusambili AM, Muriuki P, Wisofschi S, Shumba CS, Mantel M, Obure J, et al. Male involvement in reproductive and maternal and new child health: An evaluative qualitative study on facilitators and barriers from rural Kenya. Front Public Health. 2021;9:644293. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.644293. doi: 10.3389/fpubh. 2021.644293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McLean KE, Thulin EJ. “If the woman doesn’t prevent, you will become pregnant”: Exploring male involvement in contraceptive use preceding unplanned pregnancy in Sierra Leone. Stud Fam Plan. 2022;53:153–71. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Diamond-Smith N, Mitchell A, Cornell A, Dahal M, Gopalakrishnan L, Johnson M, et al. The development and feasibility of a group-based household-level intervention to improve preconception nutrition in Nawalparasi district of Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:666. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12980-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cockcroft A, Omer K, Gidado Y, Baba MC, Aziz A, Ansari U, et al. Universal home visits improve male knowledge and attitudes about maternal and child health in Bauchi State, Nigeria: Secondary outcome analysis of a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. J Glob Health. 2022;12:04003. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04003. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kalindi AM, Houle B, Smyth BM, Chisumpa VH. Gender inequities in women’s access to maternal health care utilisation in Zambia: A qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:755. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06078-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Doyle K, Kazimbaya S, Levtov R, Banerjee J, Betron M, Sethi R, et al. The relationship between inequitable gender norms and provider attitudes and quality of care in maternal health services in Rwanda: A mixed methods study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:156. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03592-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Buser JM, Moyer CA, Boyd CJ, Zulu D, Ngoma-Hazemba A, Mtenje JT, et al. Cultural beliefs and health-seeking practices: Rural Zambians’ views on maternal-newborn care. Midwifery. 2020;85:102686. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102686. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Munisi G, Mbele S, Ngoye E, Kahwa J, Mfugale L, Agarwal A. Washington, DC: EngenderHealth; 2021. The Importance of Male Engagement and Male-Friendly Services for Improving Uptake of Health Services: EngenderHealth’s Experience through the USAID Boresha Afya Programs in Tanzania. Available from: https://www.engenderhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/USAID-Boresha-Afya-Tanzania-Male-Friend ly-Services-brief.pdf . [Last accessed on 2022 Aug 16] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.MirzaiiNajmabadi K, Karimi L, Ebadi A. Exploring the barriers to sexual and reproductive health education for men in Iran: A qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019;24:179–86. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_132_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Moyo E, Dzinamarira T, Moyo P, Murewanhema G, Ross A. Men’s involvement in maternal health in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review of enablers and barriers. Midwifery. 2024;133:103993. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103993. doi: 10.1016/j.midw. 2024.103993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dukes A, Palm G. Reproductive justice and support for young fathers. Infant Ment Health J. 2019;40:710–24. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Draper H, Ives J. Men’s involvement in antenatal care and labour: Rethinking a medical model. Midwifery. 2013;29:723–9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Panter‐Brick C, Burgess A, Eggerman M, McAllister F, Pruett K, Leckman JF. Practitioner review: Engaging fathers – recommendations for a game change in parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence. J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 2014;55:1187–212. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pillai VK, Maleku A. Reproductive health and social development in developing countries: Changes and interrelationships. Br J Soc Work. 2015;45:842–60. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES