Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 2;85(1):118–133. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-3256

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

KEAP1 and STK11 co-mutations regulate resistance to G12Ci + SOS1i.

A-C, Heat map of cell viability and excess over Bliss for the indicated cells treated with a 9×9 matrix of G12Ci ± SOS1i (A), G12Ci dose response curves (B), G12Ci EC50 values (C), and sum of excess over Bliss values for (D).NT (black closed squares), STK11KO (dk.grey closed circles), KEAP1KO (grey open squares), and STK11/KEAP1 DKO (lt.grey open circles) H358 cells.* p < 0.05, p < 0.01 vs. NT. Data are the mean from three independent experiments, each experiment had three technical replicates. E, TIC frequency in the indicated cells ± SOS1i. ** χ2 > 0.01, *** χ2 < 0.001 for SOS1i treated vs. untreated; ### χ2 < 0.001 vs. NT. F-G, In situ resistance assays assessing acquired adagrasib (F) or sotorasib (G) resistance in NT (black), STK11KO (dk.grey), KEAP1KO (grey), and STK11/KEAP1 DKO (lt.grey) cells. *** p < 0.001 vs. NT. H-I. Assessment of acquired resistance to the G12Ci adagrasib (H) or sotorasib (I) resistance in NT (black), STK11KO (dark grey), KEAP1KO (grey), and STK11/KEAP1 DKO (light grey) alone or in the presence of SOS1i (red). *** p < 0.001 for G12Ci vs G12Ci+SOS1i.

J-K. Waterfall plot of percent change in tumor volume from H2030 xenografts left untreated or treated with G12Ci +/− SOS1i for 7d (J) or 10d (K).