Skip to main content
PCN Reports: Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences logoLink to PCN Reports: Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
. 2025 Jan 3;4(1):e70051. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70051

Safety of electroconvulsive therapy in the context of physiological and medical complexity: A state‐of‐the art review

Alby Elias 1,2, Soumitra Das 1,2,, James Kirkland 2, Sarabjit Loyal 2, Naveen Thomas 2
PMCID: PMC11695668  PMID: 39759458

Abstract

Medical contraindications and complications pose challenges for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Most published reports are scattered across various physiological systems and individual disease conditions. This review aimed to evaluate the literature on physiological and medical complexities during ECT and discuss risk mitigation strategies in a comprehensive review. We searched PubMed and Embase for contraindications and precautions during ECT with relevant MeSH terms and appraised previous reviews on the same topic. The results suggest that mortality directly attributed to ECT is extremely rare. Instances of fatalities, including fetal deaths, have been reported after ECT in the presence of recent myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, intracranial aneurysm and tumors, pheochromocytoma, sepsis, and pregnancy. However, there are no definite conclusions or consensus on attributions of the outcomes to ECT in all cases because of the time lag between the treatment and deaths and confounding factors. The risks can be mitigated with safety protocols, adequate stakeholder communication, collaboration with anesthetists and specialists, consultation‐liaison services, and ECT education. Overall, ECT remains a relatively safe treatment even in the presence of medical and physiological complexities. In rare instances, certain medical conditions may indicate a high risk for ECT, where practitioners avoid the treatment or administer it with precautions if the risk‐benefit ratio favors its use.

Keywords: ECT, electroconvulsive therapy, medical complication, precaution, risk

INTRODUCTION

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), the oldest somatic intervention in psychiatry, continues to remain a highly effective treatment for mood and psychotic disorders. 1 , 2 Practitioners frequently encounter medical conditions that require precaution during ECT. Published reports have, however, formed a piecemeal literature with reports scattered across various physiological systems and individual disease conditions. This account collates the results into a single comprehensive review. Although the contraindications for ECT form well‐trodden ground, findings accrued since past reviews make it an evolving landscape.

ECT is an enigmatic treatment in medicine: it has an impressive safety record despite profound neurochemical and hemodynamic changes associated with seizures, such as a 15‐fold rise in adrenalin and up to two times increased blood pressure (BP). 3 , 4 , 5 In contrast to the public fear of death from ECT, which was present in 20% of participants in one study, and a lay viewpoint that electric current is passed on to the brain, mortality directly related to ECT is extremely rare. 6 , 7 , 8 The skull, with a relatively high impedance, attenuates the electric flow to the brain during ECT. Most of the current is short‐circuited around the skull. 9 Therefore, the voltage gradient across a single neuron cell body drops to 0.006 V, far below the action potential required for depolarization. 10 It is rapid kindling of neurons induced by repeated pulses of current that eventually results in seizure. 11 Since the properties of electric current entering the brain are within physiological parameters, and the temperature rise in the intracranial tissues is negligible, medical complications of ECT attributed to the current per se are very few, such as electric current induced bradycardia. They mainly arise from three factors: convulsions, hemodynamic alterations, and effects of anesthesia. 6 Even when adverse effects occur, attribution to ECT is confounded by other medical factors. 12

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted the literature search using the following keywords: “Electroconvulsive therapy OR ECT,” “contraindications,” and “medical precautions.” Additionally, we performed searches for individual systems and conditions, such as “cardiovascular,” “aneurysms,” “arrhythmias,” “myocardial infarction,” “cardiac failure,” “aortic stenosis,” “deep vein thrombosis,” “DVT,” “aortic aneurysm,” “stroke,” “intracranial space‐occupying lesions,” “delirium,” “dementia,” “skull defects,” “myasthenia gravis,” “myopathies,” “fractures,” “pacemakers,” “implant,” “pregnancy,” “epilepsy,” “medications,” “kidney diseases,” “pheochromocytoma,” “intraocular pressure,” “obesity,” “infection,” “COPD,” and “COVID 19.” The search was limited to English‐language and human studies.

To reduce the risk of selection bias, we reviewed previous reviews and practice guidelines on ECT administration in the presence of medical conditions. 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 Using the OVID search tool, we searched for each condition in PubMed and EMBASE till March 2024. All abstracts were screened and, when relevant, two independent reviewers evaluated the full texts. Discussions with a third reviewer resolved disparities. Due to significant heterogenicity of the topic, we adopted the state‐of‐the‐art (SOTA) review. A SOTA review is a type of literature review that emphasizes the most recent and innovative developments in a specific field or research area, such as “the application of ECT in complex medical conditions.” Although we conducted a comprehensive and systematic search, our primary focus remained on recent advancements, emerging trends, and cutting‐edge findings, ensuring alignment with the principles and purpose of a SOTA review. This approach allowed us to capture the forefront of current knowledge and highlight key innovations within the field.

Using the COVIDENCE tool, we initially identified 1803 studies. A large proportion of these were excluded in the initial screening due to being opinion pieces, commentaries, unstructured reviews, conference presentations, or unstructured case studies. After this preliminary filtration, 376 studies remained for full‐text review. Ultimately, only 124 papers were found to be relevant for this review (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram: electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) application in medically compromised patients.

RESULTS

Cardiovascular diseases

ECT was given in almost all cardiac conditions. 16 Most of the cardiovascular complications associated with ECT are minor and manageable. 17 The electrical stimulus is parasympathetic, causing transient asystole and bradycardia lasting for several seconds, followed by sympathetic activity resulting from seizure. 18 The catecholamine surge may persist for minutes, translating into various hemodynamic changes, namely, tachycardia, hypertension, and increased cardiac contractility. 19 BP may rise twofold, and heart rate by 1.45 times. 5 Enhanced cardiac contractility may increase mean cardiac output up to 81%. 4 All these changes can be effectively blocked by β‐adrenoceptor antagonists. 5 With bifrontal stimulation, sympathetic stimulation occurs without a preceding phase of significant bradycardia (Table 1). 18 , 20

  • (a)

    Arrhythmias

    The reported incidence varied from 8% in healthy people to 80% in patients with pre‐existing cardiac diseases. 21 , 22 The most common complication is ventricular ectopic. 22 More serious arrhythmias reported from one study of 2279 patients who were given 17,394 ECTs included second degree AV block (n = 2), bradycardia (n = 2), ventricular tachycardia (n = 2), ventricular fibrillation (n = 1), prolonged asystole, and cardiac arrest (n = 1). 12 Notably, no one died during or soon after ECT. Another review of 80 patients showed ECT was relatively safe in older patients with pre‐existing cardiac risk factors. 36 Persistent ECG changes or an elevation of cardiac enzymes were not observed after ECT. 37 , 38

  • (b)

    Myocardial infarction

    Fatality in the minutes after ECT was documented in relatively old literature in a person who had an autopsy‐proven myocardial infarction. 23 Left ventricular hypertrophy was present in this case. There is a risk of cardiac arrhythmias, recurrent infarction, and myocardial rupture with ECT, particularly in the first 10 days after infarction. This risk is deemed to be reduced after 3 months. 15 However, ECT was safely given without dose titration for a patient with catatonia 4 weeks after myocardial infarction using a β‐adrenergic antagonist and close monitoring of cardiac parameters. 24

  • (c)

    Cardiac failure

    In a case series, ECT was not associated with any sentinel event in five patients with congestive cardiac failure. 15 Published data support the safety of ECT with cardiac ejection fraction as low as 15%, including in older individuals. 25 In such instances, ECT was administered with medications that reduce cardiac workload (e.g., lisinopril) or β‐blockers that decrease tachycardia and hypertension.

  • (d)

    Aortic stenosis

    A case series of 10 patients and a single case report demonstrated the safe administration of ECT in severe aortic stenosis. 39 , 40 Two patients had low BP 1 min after ECT, but this was successfully managed.

  • (e)

    Deep vein thrombosis

    ECT is an effective treatment for mood disorders and catatonia. These conditions can be associated with diminished mobility and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). 41 Pulmonary embolism (PE) due to dislodgement of the thrombus during convulsion is a known theoretical risk in the presence of DVT. In line with this, there are documented instances of PE developing after ECT, including fatal ones. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 However, in several patients with DVT, ECT was safely administered. 41 , 42 The outcomes of ECT in the presence of DVT are thus mixed and form an area that warrants further investigations, given the lethal nature of PE. A case report showed sudden death after ECT, which was possibly linked to DVT in the context of COVID‐19 infection, but without a definite conclusion. 43 Possible contributing factors to embolization in DVT include the above‐knee location and size of the thrombus. The commencement of anticoagulants does not offer absolute protection from PE due to an already‐developed venous thrombus, which may still dislodge during convulsive movements. If the clinical indication for ECT is compelling, discussion with vascular surgeons and anesthetists is imperative to achieve complete muscle relaxation and optimal outcomes.

  • (f)

    Aortic aneurysm

    A case series of eight patients suggested that ECT was safe in people with aortic aneurysms with aortic diameters ranging from 3.3 to 5.3 cm. 44

Table 1.

ECT in the presence of cardiovascular and neurological conditions.

Medical conditions Level of evidence Adverse events Death Caution/comments
Cardiac arrythmias 12 , 21 , 22 Retrospective chart review Ventricular ectopic most common, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation extremely rare None Cardiac evaluation and monitoring, including review of electrolytes such as potassium and magnesium
Case reports
Myocardial infarction 15 , 23 , 24 Case reports Arrythmias Yes High degree of caution
Wait for 3 months. Appropriate use of β‐blockers
Avoid titration or consider bifrontal placement
Cardiac failure 15 , 25 Case series Hypertension No Cardiac evaluation
Chart reviews Angiotensin system antihypertensives
Deep vein thrombosis 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 Case reports Pulmonary embolism Yes High degree of caution
Reviews Hematology consultation
Anticoagulation
Extended monitoring
Maximum muscle paralysis with an increased dose of muscle relaxants
Intracranial aneurysms 30 , 31 , 32 Case reports Headache Yes Neurosurgery evaluation
Reviews High degree of caution for aneurysms more than 1.5 cm
Esmolol with intraarterial blood pressure monitoring
Brain tumors 33 , 34 , 35 Case reports Secondary myoclonic seizure, ping‐pong gaze, Todd's paralysis, delirium and coma Not in the recent literature Moderate degree of caution
Reviews Neurosurgery opinion
Dexamethasone
Phenytoin

Risk mitigation in the presence of cardiovascular diseases

A waiting period of 3 months after myocardial infarction is regarded as safe for ECT. 15 Cardiovascular complications can be mitigated by avoiding multiple stimulations and using β‐blockers to attenuate hypersympathetic response in high‐risk populations. Patients should be advised to take these medications the morning before treatment with sips of water. 16 Dose titration may be avoided, or bifrontal placement may be considered for patients at risk of asystole, such as those taking β‐blockers. 25 After successfully treating patients with cardiac failure with an ejection fraction varying from 20% to 25%, Stern and colleagues developed a protocol that included administering regular cardiac medications 60–90 min before ECT and avoiding anticholinergic drugs. 45

Cardiac monitoring during ECT

Given the significant hemodynamic alterations, in particular seizure‐related catecholamine surge, cardiac monitoring is an essential part of ECT. The monitoring normally entails electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and noninvasive intermittent BP measurements. 46 This level of monitoring does not capture rapid hemodynamic changes. Novel noninvasive devices, such as Nexfin HD, can continually monitor cardiac output and beat‐to‐beat arterial BP. Since the hemodynamic changes associated with ECT are short‐lived, techniques that use continuous monitoring to detect rapid changes can be useful, especially in patients with high‐risk conditions. Patients with low cardiac ejection fraction will require monitoring of BP concurrently with both an arterial line and dual BP cuff monitoring using monitors on both arms with continuous BP cycling. 47 Esmolol, a β‐adrenergic blocker, attenuated an increase in heart rate and systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BP from a dosage of 1.0 mg kg−1 onward. 48

Neurological and neurosurgical conditions

  • (a)

    Aneurysm and stroke

    So far, 27 cases of ECT in patients with aneurysms have been published. 30 ECT was safe with secured and unsecured aneurysms up to a size of 2.1 cm, except in one instance where an 84‐year‐old patient died from subarachnoid hemorrhage following rupture of an anterior cerebral artery aneurysm of 1.9 cm 2 days after 10th right unilateral ECT. 31 , 32 The patient received esmolol; the peri‐ictal BP increased to 207/89 mm Hg. This report suggests that ECT is not universally safe in patients with aneurysms. The risk appears to increase with large aneurysms. One case report demonstrated the safety of ECT within 2 weeks after stroke. 49 Another comparative study showed no difference in the delirium incidence between ECT given after stroke and without stroke; all cases of post‐ECT delirium during the poststroke period were seen after caudate stroke. 50

  • (b)

    Intracranial space‐occupying lesions

    An earlier review of reports published until 1984 showed complications in 74% (n = 38) and mortality in 8% (n = 29) of patients with intracranial neoplasms after ECT. 33 Complications included aphasia, ataxia, hemiplegia, delirium, and coma. Although the authors suggested that ECT could have precipitated deaths in 8%, some of them had aggressive tumors like glioblastoma. A more modern systematic review and retrospective data found that ECT was largely safe, with no mortality in patients with intracranial tumors. 34 , 35 Buday et al. reviewed 40 reports published until 2019. Reversible adverse reactions reported in six patients (15%) were secondary myoclonic seizure, ping‐pong gaze, Todd's paralysis, delirium, and coma. Differences between the earlier review and Buday et al. were prior knowledge of tumors, more benign tumors, dose titration, and use of dexamethasone in the latter. 33 , 34 The largest reported tumor was 8.1 × 7.6 × 4.1 cm, and ECT was not associated with adverse effects in this case. 51 A mild mass effect does not appear to preclude ECT if there is no midline shift. 52 Case reports suggest that ECT is safe in idiopathic intracranial tension. 53

  • (c)

    Delirium and dementia

    Although ECT may cause transient postictal confusion, there is no evidence to suggest that delirium and dementia are contraindications for ECT. The evidence indicates that ECT is beneficial in reducing behavioral symptoms in a subgroup of patients with these conditions. 54 , 55

  • (d)

    Skull pathology

    Skull defects can cause the direct entry of electricity into the brain with severe consequences. Given its high impedance, the skull attenuates the current flow so that only a small portion enters the brain. 9 Patients may be regularly screened for skull deficits because of trauma or surgery and lytic skull lesions.

Risk mitigation

A retrospective study identified one abnormal scan that prevented ECT out of 108 scans (0.93%) performed as routine pre‐ECT imaging. 56 Considering such a low probability and the relative safety of ECT, brain imaging may be performed for patients at risk, for instance those with prior aneurysms, heritable disorders associated with intracranial aneurysms, neurological symptoms such as headaches, and those above 60 years of age with a history of hypertension or smoking. Neurology and cardiology consultations are required in such situations. While esmolol is administered, intra‐arterial BP monitoring at the first session of ECT to understand the exact real‐time variation of BP during the preictal, ictal, and postictal phases is required to determine sufficient esmolol dose for subsequent sessions. Risk management in the presence of intracranial tumors includes the administration of dexamethasone to reduce edema around the tumor and phenytoin to reduce the risk of recurrent seizures. 34 An interdisciplinary approach encompassing consultations with neurologists, neurosurgeons, and anesthetists may reduce the risk of complications (Table 1).

Neuromuscular disorders

  • 1.

    Myasthenia gravis

    Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by antibodies against nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (anti‐AChAb), affecting the neuromuscular junction. Case reports suggest ECT is safe in patients with MG, provided adequate precautions are taken. 57 , 58 During the active phase of the disease, ECT should be avoided, and the patient should be in reasonable remission before undergoing ECT. The patient's condition can be managed through expert opinion from a neurologist and regular monitoring of pulmonary function tests, plasma pseudocholinesterase levels, and anti‐AChAb levels. 58 Anticholinergic agents are usually avoided to prevent a cholinergic crisis. Although suxamethonium was safe during remission, response to succinylcholine during ECT was variable, and in one instance, rocuronium was used with sugammadex reversal. 57 , 59 A significant reduction in endplate receptors at the neuromuscular junction may limit the action of succinylcholine, causing resistance or decreasing the safety margin. 60 Prednisolone and cholinesterase inhibitors, commonly used in MG, can prolong the half‐life of succinylcholine and result in longer‐than‐usual neuromuscular blockade. 60 , 61 Cholinesterase inhibitors can increase the risk of asystole and bradycardia, and in these situations, bifrontal ECT and stimulation without titration may be considered. 62

  • 2.

    Inflammatory myopathies

    In patients with inflammatory myopathy, neuromuscular blockers require caution due to potential complications such as delayed or prolonged effects, hyperkalemia, diaphragmatic dysfunction, impaired coughing, and swallowing difficulties requiring special anesthetic care. These concerns arise from a rise in serum creatine phosphokinase (CK) after ECT. 37 , 63 Empirical evidence also suggests that CK levels normalized with subsequent ECT when administered with succinylcholine without worsening muscle disease. 37 , 63 , 64 Ntatsaki et al. used the nondepolarizing muscle relaxant mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg followed by reversal with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate in a patient with inclusion myositis. 65 Management strategies in inflammatory myopathies include monitoring CK levels and providing enhanced anesthetic care to prevent aspiration.

Bone fractures, muscle tears, and vascular injuries

In the preanesthetic era of ECT, musculoskeletal injuries were expected during convulsive movements. In modern practice, fractures are not necessarily contraindications for ECT. Case series suggest that ECT can be safely and successfully given to patients with bone fractures with coordinated care from orthopedic surgeons and anesthetists. 66 , 67 Similarly, ECT was safely administered 2 weeks after the repair of the severed strap muscle and the anterior jugular vein. 68 Precaution is required in such conditions; succinylcholine in an adequate dose (1.5 mg/kg) may bring sufficient muscle relaxation, protecting musculoskeletal structures. There were cases of successful ECT with no adverse events in patients with Harrington rod implants. 69

Implanted devices

  • (a)

    Pacemakers

    Pacemakers or implanted defibrillators are not contraindications for ECT. 70 , 71 , 72 Supraventricular tachycardia was reported in one patient, which resolved promptly and did not prevent further ECT. The synchronous mode is preserved as serious arrhythmias are a risk of the asynchronous mode. A cardiologist's opinion must be sought before proceeding to ECT for patients with these devices.

  • (b)

    Deep brain stimulators

    A review of 21 cases showed that ECT was safe with deep brain stimulators, provided precautions were taken. 73 Burr holes through which deep brain simulators (DBSs) were placed must be avoided during ECT, and the device is to be reprogrammed to 0 V and switched off. Although the DBS was turned off during the whole ECT course in seven instances, it was only turned off immediately before ECT in other cases and turned on in recovery units. There was no evidence of brain tissue damage, a change in neurological function, DBS device damage, or reprogramming because of ECT. In studies where DBS electrode placement was confirmed before and after ECT by neuroimaging, there was no change in the position of the DBS electrodes.

  • (c)

    Cochlear implant

    A cochlear implant was previously considered an absolute contraindication for ECT. 74 As years passed, it was found that cochlear implant users needed ECT. Reflecting on this need, the Danish Psychiatric Association and other authors reviewed the literature and later concluded that a cochlear implant is not an absolute contraindication. 75 ECT did not damage the implant even with the highest level of energy (1004 mC) delivered from an ECT device. 75 Stimulations in all but one patient were administered through the side contralateral to the implant; for one patient who had the implant fitted to the right ear, right unilateral ECT was administered. 76 Discomfort around the jaw was the only reported adverse effect. However, given the dearth of data about ipsilateral ECT with the cochlear implant, it is safe to administer stimulations at the maximum distance away from the implant. Bifrontal ECT is safe in this regard.

Pregnancy

The official joint statement from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, several original studies, and meta‐reviews indicate that ECT is usually a safe and effective treatment in pregnancy. 77 , 78 , 79 However, some authors published a contradictory report and cautioned that ECT should be used as a last resort in pregnancy. 80 The findings included a reduced fetal heart rate and several fetal deaths (7.1% from ECT given to 169 pregnant women). 80 In one instance, fetal death occurred after status epilepticus in the mother following ECT. 81 Other adverse events were fetal arrhythmias, premature birth, preeclampsia, vaginal bleeding, and uterine contractions without labor. Although there are inconsistent views, most reviews are reassuring, and reports differ due to varied attributions of adverse events to ECT. 77 , 78 , 79 A recent review rated complications as low‐to‐moderate grade and not life‐threatening to pregnant women. 82 Joint management with the obstetric team involving frequent fetal monitoring is critical. A semi‐prone position, endotracheal intubation to reduce the risk of aspiration, the elevation of the right hip to improve the placental perfusion, extended fetal monitoring, and inhalational anesthetics to minimize the risk of uterine contractions are essential considerations for ECT in pregnancy. 83 There are few reports on ECT during special situations like twin pregnancies where there were no adverse outcomes. 84 , 85

Epilepsy

ECT has an anticonvulsant effect and is hence not contraindicated in epilepsy or if there is a history of previous seizures. 86 However, a neurological evaluation is to be completed to determine the cause of the seizure, which may imply extra caution for ECT.

ECT and concomitant medications

  • (a)

    Theophylline

    Co‐administration of ECT and theophylline medications was followed by prolonged and recurrent seizures in one patient and prolonged seizure (190 s) in another. 87 , 88 Theophylline is known to induce seizure at a serum level of 25–50 μg/mL. However, recurrent seizure after ECT occurred at 22.6 μg/dL, measured 3 h after ECT, suggesting an interaction. 87 It is therefore crucial to measure the theophylline level before ECT and ensure it is well below seizure‐prone levels. In most documented cases, ECT was uneventful when administered with theophylline. 89 Interestingly, theophylline with a level of 10–15 μg/mL was also used to induce or generate sufficiently long seizures for therapeutic purposes. 89

  • (b)

    Lithium

    Earlier case reports and retrospective chart reviews showed prolonged seizure, apnea, and delirium with concomitant lithium and ECT. 90 , 91 , 92 However, a recent prospective randomized controlled trial and a retrospective study did not observe severe complications because of this combination when lithium levels were below 0.6 mEq/L. 93 , 94 Caution is still required, and lithium must be withheld before ECT in the morning.

  • (c)

    Antiepileptics

    Contrary to the conventional wisdom, several reports including controlled trials showed that antiepileptic medications did not affect seizure quality or the clinical efficacy of ECT. 95 , 96 , 97 Therefore, these medications may be continued during ECT. Although results of combined ECT and benzodiazepines are mixed, the overall picture suggests that seizure can be achieved with clinical efficacy, especially in catatonia, for which this combination is highly useful. 97 Stimulus dose titration to determine the seizure threshold is recommended when ECT is given with antiepileptics (Table 2).

Table 2.

ECT in other medical conditions.

Conditions Level of evidence Adverse events Death Caution/comments
Musculoskeletal injuries 66 , 67 Case reports None reported No Orthopedic opinion
Additional anesthetic consultation
Succinyl choline
1.5 mg/kg
Vascular injuries 68 Single case report None reported No Vascular surgery opinion
Additional anesthetic consultation
Succinyl choline
1.5 mg/kg
Pacemakers Defibrillators 70 , 71 , 72 Case series SVT No Keep synchronized mode
Cardiac evaluation
Deep brain stimulator 73 Case reports No No Avoid burr holes.
Reprogram to 0 during ECT
Cochlear implant 74 , 75 Case reports No No Electrodes farther from the implantContralateral stimulation or bifrontal stimulation
Medications
Theophylline 87 , 88 Case report Status epilepticus prolonged seizure No Extra monitoring
Review theophylline level
Lithium 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 Chart reviews Delirium, prolonged apnea No Aim low serum lithium below 0.6 mEq/L
Anticonvulsants 95 , 96 , 97 RCT Prolonged seizure No Avoid lithium 24 h prior to ECT
RCT Dose titration to determine threshold
Opthalmic Disease 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 Case reports Increased IOP, vitreous detachment None Moderate caution, check IOPRetinal detachment reported after ECT
Obesity 104 , 105 Case series Desaturation No Supine position with a 15–30° elevation of the upper body
Supraglottic device and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
Non‐depolarizing agents

Abbreviations: ECT, electroconvulsive therapy; IOP, intraocular pressure; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SVT, supraventricular tachycardia.

Other conditions

  • (a)

    Kidney diseases and pheochromocytoma

    Individuals with renal failure undergoing hemodialysis received ECT without adverse reactions. 106 , 107 , 108 Caution is required to reduce BP before administering ECT with β‐blockers such as esmolol. 107 Pheochromocytoma is a rare neoplasm with an incidence of 0.2–0.8 per 100,000 individuals. 109 Hypertension can occur in this condition because of the catecholamine‐secreting tumor. A 34‐year‐old woman with pheochromocytoma died 3 h after ECT due to sudden vascular collapse. 110 The authors of this report proposed that death could be attributed to ECT, vascular collapse from sodium thiopental, or emotional stress. Notably, the pulse rate was 100/min, and there was no record of hypertension. In another instance, a 27‐year‐old man with pheochromocytoma received ECT. In minutes after the first stimulation, the systolic BP went up to 260 mm Hg, which was reduced by administering a β‐blocker. The patient had subsequent ECT without complications. 111

  • (b)

    Ophthalmic conditions

    An increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) occurs immediately after the beginning of the seizure, which returns to normal ∼3 min after stimulation. 98 While retinal detachment was reported during the recovery from bilateral ECT in one instance, no adverse ophthalmological outcomes were noted after ECT in patients who had previous retinal detachment, albeit 30 years ago in one case. 99 , 100 , 107 No ocular complications occurred in relation to ECT after cataract surgery, in glaucomatous eyes, or in the presence of titanium‐based trabecular microbypass stents for open‐angle glaucoma treatment. 102 , 103 , 112 There is a need for regular ophthalmic consultation and IOP measurements when a patient presents with such risk factors.

  • (c)

    Respiratory diseases

    Considering that ECT involves general anesthesia and assisted ventilation, careful consideration of pulmonary conditions is crucial. According to one retrospective study, four of 34 patients with asthma experienced an exacerbation of symptoms, which were successfully managed by standard anti‐asthma treatments. 113 However, no complications were reported after ECT in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 114 As mentioned earlier in this review, the use of theophylline should be carefully evaluated.

  • (d)

    Fever and infection

    A single case report showed the safety and efficacy of ECT in a 4‐year‐old boy with febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) that followed pharyngitis and high fever. 115 ECT was successfully given to patients with symptomatic COVID‐19. 116 In the Regestein and Reich case series, three out of 19 patients who received ECT had signs of infection, including Gram‐positive septicemia and unrelenting fever. 15 Tachycardia was observed, with the highest reported pulse rate of 180/min. Death was reported in a young patient with massive PE, pleural effusion, and staphylococcal pneumonia after developing ventricular fibrillation during ECT. 15

  • (e)

    Obesity and conditions that increase the risk of aspiration

    Obesity can pose challenges during ECT, given delayed gastric and esophageal emptying and difficulties in protecting the airway. 104 , 117 Also, prospective observational data suggest that obesity and the duration of seizure were the factors correlated with post‐ECT desaturation. 118 However, the duration of unconsciousness during ECT is relatively brief. A review of 50 obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 45 or above who received 660 ECT sessions demonstrated a safe administration of the treatment without a requirement for tracheal intubation. 104 Patients fasted overnight and received 100% oxygen with assistance of positive pressure using a face mask. ECT was performed in the supine position with a 15–30° elevation of the upper body. In another instance, when hypoxic episodes occurred because of suspected inadequate ventilation, a lower dose of succinylcholine, 0.5 mg/kg based on the total body weight, helped to restore adequate oxygenation. 119 This may be understood against a background of increased muscular consumption of oxygen because of succinylcholine‐induced fasciculations. 120 Some authors, therefore, recommend nondepolarizing agents, such as rocuronium, in obesity. 105 Other strategies to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes with ECT in obesity include a supraglottic device and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

Age

Although advanced age is associated with increased medical morbidities, old age per se is not associated with mortality after ECT. 121 Until now, the oldest person to receive ECT was a 100‐year‐old woman who safely underwent the treatment. 40 ECT is safe in children. 122 , 123 No evidence supports the fear that ECT adversely affects brain growth (Table 3).

Table 3.

ECT in special physiological conditions.

Conditions Level of evidence Adverse events Deaths Comments
Extremes of age 121 , 122 Systematic review None None Electroconvulsive therapy is safe in extremes of age
Care reports
Pregnancy 77 , 79 , 80 , 82 , 83 Systematic reviews Fetal arrythmias, premature birth, preclampsia, vaginal bleeding, and uterine contractions without labor Yes Obstetric evaluation
(fetal deaths) High degree of caution
Semiprone position, endotracheal intubation to reduce the risk of aspiration
Elevation of the right hip to improve the placental perfusion
Fetal monitoring, and inhalational anesthetics to minimize the risk of uterine contractions

LIMITATIONS

The above results are to be cautiously interpreted. They are from limited evidence constituted by case reports and case series, uncontrolled data, and retrospective reviews. The reproducibility of some of these results is thus limited. Also, this report is prepared based on extant literature in which serious and fatal outcomes may not be reported. Still, ECT is a time‐tested intervention in psychiatry and has remained in practice for over eight decades. This narrative review is biased toward a nonsystematic selection of the literature without a specific protocol and hence is not inclusive of every report of ECT in one or another medical condition.

CONCLUSION

In general, ECT can be safely administered to patients with various medical conditions and physiological complexities. In certain conditions, ECT may be avoided or administered with high caution if indicated based on a favorable risk–benefit ratio as relevant for individual patients. These conditions include a recent myocardial infarction in the last 4 weeks, intracranial aneurysms of more than 1 cm in size, proximal DVT, pheochromocytoma, and systemic infections. In particular, fatalities associated with DVT warrant extreme precaution and monitoring in this condition. In a nutshell, the extension of ECT to patients with medical and physiological complexities expands the scope of this treatment and thus the horizon of psychiatry.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Alby Elias, Soumitra Das, Sarabjit Loyal, and Naveen Thomas contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study. Data acquisition and analysis were performed by Alby Elias, Soumitra Das, and James Kirkland. Naveen Thomas, Sarabjit Loyal, and Soumitra Das contributed significantly to drafting the manuscript and developing the figures and tables.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT

The ethics approval statement is not applicable.

PATIENT CONSENT STATEMENT

The patient consent statement is not applicable.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The clinical trial registration is not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The research received funding from ECT research fund, Western Health Mental Health and Wellbeing Services, Melbourne.

Elias A, Das S, Kirkland J, Loyal S, Thomas N. Safety of electroconvulsive therapy in the context of physiological and medical complexity: a state‐of‐the art review. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Rep. 2025;4:e70051. 10.1002/pcn5.70051

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All relevant data are within the paper.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ross EL, Zivin K, Maixner DF. Cost‐effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy vs pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy for treatment‐resistant depression in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(7):713–722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The UK ECT Review Group. Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9360):799–808. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3. Weinger MB, Partridge BL, Hauger R, Mirow A, Brown M. Prevention of the cardiovascular and neuroendocrine response to electroconvulsive therapy: II. Effects of pretreatment regimens on catecholamines, ACTH, vasopressin, and cortisol. Anesth Analg. 1991;73(5):563–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wells DG, Davies GG. Hemodynamic changes associated with electroconvulsive therapy. Anesth Analg. 1987;66(11):1193–1195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jones RM, Knight PR. Cardiovascular and hormonal responses to electroconvulsive therapy. Anaesthesia. 1981;36(8):795–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kaster TS, Vigod SN, Gomes T, Sutradhar R, Wijeysundera DN, Blumberger DM. Risk of serious medical events in patients with depression treated with electroconvulsive therapy: a propensity score‐matched, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(8):686–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tørring N, Sanghani SN, Petrides G, Kellner CH, Østergaard SD. The mortality rate of electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;135(5):388–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. McFarquhar TF, Thompson J. Knowledge and attitudes regarding electroconvulsive therapy among medical students and the general public. J ECT. 2008;24(4):244–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Oostendorp TF, Delbeke J, Stegeman DF. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000;47(11):1487–1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Swartz C, Mirkovich D, Dietze D. Temperatures and voltages from the electroconvulsive therapy stimulus. J ECT. 2023;39(3):158–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Swartz CM. A mechanism of seizure induction by electricity and its clinical implications. J ECT. 2014;30(2):94–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Nuttall GA, Bowersox MR, Douglass SB, McDonald J, Rasmussen LJ, Decker PA, et al. Morbidity and mortality in the use of electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT. 2004;20(4):237–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Weiner RD, American Psychiatric Association . The practice of electroconvulsive therapy: recommendations for treatment, training, and privileging: a task force report of the American Psychiatric Association. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tess AV, Smetana GW. Medical evaluation of patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1437–1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Regestein QR, Reich P. Electroconvulsive therapy in patients at high risk for physical complications. Convuls Ther. 1985;1(2):101–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Christopher EJ. Electroconvulsive therapy in the medically ill. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2003;5(3):225–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hermida AP, Mohsin M, Marques Pinheiro AP, McCord E, Lisko JC, Head LW. The cardiovascular side effects of electroconvulsive therapy and their management. J ECT. 2022;38(1):2–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nagler J. Heart rate changes during electroconvulsive therapy. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2013;12(1):19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Khan A, Nies A, Johnson G, Becker J. Plasma catecholamines and ECT. Biol Psychiatry. 1985;20(7):799–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Stewart PT, Loo CK, MacPherson R, Hadzi‐Pavlovic D. The effect of electrode placement and pulsewidth on asystole and bradycardia during the electroconvulsive therapy stimulus. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14(5):585–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Welch CA, Drop LJ. Cardiovascular effects of ECT. Convuls Ther. 1989;5(1):35–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gerring JP, Shields HM. The identification and management of patients with a high risk for cardiac arrhythmias during modified ECT. J Clin Psychiatry. 1982;43(4):140–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hussar AE. Myocardial infarction and fatal coronary insufficiency during electroconvulsive therapy. J Am Med Assoc. 1968;204(11):1004–1007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tay KH, Lee SYL, Yap PP, Keh YS, Tor P‐C. Electroconvulsive therapy after recurrent myocardial infarction in a catatonic patient. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020;74(11):623–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Rivera FA, Lapid MI, Sampson S, Mueller PS. Safety of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with a history of heart failure and decreased left ventricular systolic heart function. J ECT. 2011;27(3):207–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Weber DL, Ruvolo C, Cashin P. Sudden death following electroconvulsive therapy. N Y State J Med. 1973;73:1000–1001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sinha D, Shah HR. Fatal pulmonary embolism in a patient treated with clozapine and electroconvulsive therapy. Int J Med Pharm Sci. 2013;4:09–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mamah D, Lammle M, Isenberg KE. Pulmonary embolism after ECT. J ECT. 2005;21(1):39–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kursawe HK, Schmikaly R. Fatal pulmonary embolism following mitigated electroconvulsive therapy. A case report from the intensive care viewpoint. Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol Beih. 1988;40:107–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Buntting CS, Tran D, Fish C, Chatha G, Jithoo R. Electroconvulsive therapy in patients with cerebral aneurysms. J ECT. 2023;39(4):220–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Mehdi SMA, Devanand DP. Electroconvulsive therapy in elderly patients with cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review with clinical recommendations. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2021;34(6):504–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Gugger J, Dunn L. Subarachnoid hemorrhage in the setting of electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with an unsecured cerebral aneurysm: a case report and review of the literature. Neurology. 2018;90(15 Suppl):P1.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Maltbie AA, Cavenar JO Jr., Wingfield MS, Volow MR, Weiner RD, Sullivan JL. Electroconvulsive therapy in the presence of brain tumor: case reports and an evaluation of risk. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980;168(7):400–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Buday J, Albrecht J, Mareš T, Podgorná G, Horáčková K, Kališová L, et al. Brain tumors and electroconvulsive therapy: a literature overview of the last 80 years. Front Neurol. 2020;11:723. 10.3389/fneur.2020.00723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lu Y, Tian Y, Gan Y, Fu Y, Chen Q, Zou L, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy in psychiatric patients with arachnoid cysts: a retrospective chart study. Brain Sci. 2022;12(10):1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Rice EH, Sombrotto LB, Markowitz JC, Leon AC. Cardiovascular morbidity in high‐risk patients during ECT. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151(11):1637–1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Dec GW Jr., Stern TA, Welch C. The effects of electroconvulsive therapy on serial electrocardiograms and serum cardiac enzyme values. A prospective study of depressed hospitalized inpatients. JAMA. 1985;253(17):2525–2529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Braasch ER, Demaso DR. Effect of electroconvulsive therapy on serum isoenzymes. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137(5):625–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mueller PS, Barnes RD, Varghese R, Nishimura RA, Rasmussen KG. The safety of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(11):1360–1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. O'Reardon JP, Cristancho MA, Ryley B, Patel KR, Haber HL. Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment of major depression in a 100‐year‐old patient with severe aortic stenosis: a 5‐year follow‐up report. J ECT. 2011;27(3):227–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Inagawa Y, Saito S, Okada T, Inoue K, Suda S. Electroconvulsive therapy for catatonia with deep venous thrombosis: a case series. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2018;20(4):18m02286. 10.4088/PCC.18m02286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hirata T, Yasuda K, Uemura T, Ohtsuki M, Kobayashi K, Ueda T, et al. Electroconvulsive therapy while receiving oralanticoagulation for deep venous thrombosis: report on eight cases and a review of the literature. Psychosomatics. 2019;60(4):402–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hillow MA, Kwobah EK, Gakinya B, Omari F. Sudden death after electroconvulsive therapy in the context of coronavirus disease 2019. J ECT. 2021;37(3):209–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mueller PS, Albin SM, Barnes RD, Rasmussen KG Jr.. Safety of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with unrepaired abdominal aortic aneurysm: report of 8 patients. J ECT. 2009;25(3):165–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Stern L, Hirschmann S, Grunhaus L. ECT in patients with major depressive disorder and low cardiac output. Convuls Ther. 1997;13(2):68–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Geersing PGKB, Bulte CSE, Viersen VA, Stek ML, Bouwman RA, Boer C, et al. Beat‐to‐beat hemodynamic monitoring during electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT. 2011;27(3):189–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Luo A, Abbott C, Nunez K. Approach to the high‐risk cardiac patient. J ECT. 2022;38(1):e9–e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Boere E, Birkenhäger TK, Groenland THN, van den Broek WW. Beta‐blocking agents during electroconvulsive therapy: a review. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(1):43–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Weintraub D, Lippmann SB. Electroconvulsive therapy in the acute poststroke period. J ECT. 2000;16(4):415–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Martin M, Figiel G, Mattingly G, Zorumski CF, Jarvis MR. ECT‐induced interictal delirium in patients with a history of a CVA. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1992;5(3):149–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Desseilles M, Thiry J‐C, Monville J‐F, Ansseau M, Makhinson M. Electroconvulsive therapy for depression in a patient with an intracranial arachnoid cyst. J ECT. 2009;25(1):64–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Katzell L, Carr B. Successful electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with a meningioma with mass effect. J ECT. 2023;39(3):128–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Parker MT, Putinta KM, Carr BR. Successful electroconvulsive therapy in idiopathic intracranial hypertension with mood disorder and partial empty Sella syndrome. J ECT. 2023;39(3):202–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Rao V, Lyketsos CG. The benefits and risks of ECT for patients with primary dementia who also suffer from depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(8):729–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Lupke K, Warren N, Teodorczuk A, Steele S, Kolur U, Wand A, et al. A systematic review of modified electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to treat delirium. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023;147(5):403–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Sajedi PI, Mitchell J, Herskovits EH, Raghavan P. Routine cross‐sectional head imaging before electroconvulsive therapy: a tertiary center experience. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:429–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Warren MB, Elder S, Litchfield NP. Electroconvulsive therapy for depression comorbid with myasthenia gravis: a case report and review of the literature. J ECT. 2018;34(1):50–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Sreeraj V, Venkataramaiah S, Sunka A, Kamath S, Rao N. Successful administration of electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia and coexisting myasthenia gravis. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019;61(6):653–654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Abel M, Eisenkraft JB, Patel N. Response to suxamethonium in a myasthenic patient during remission. Anaesthesia. 1991;46(1):30–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Calarge CA, Crowe RR. Electroconvulsive therapy in myasthenia gravis. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2004;16(4):225–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Sunew KY, Hicks RG. Effects of neostigmine and pyridostigmine on duration of succinylcholine action and pseudocholinesterase activity. Anesthesiology. 1978;49(3):188–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Otsuka H, Shikama H, Saito T, Ishikawa T, Kemmotsu O. Asystole during electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with depression and myasthenia gravis. Masui. 2000;49(8):893–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Delucia B, Patel R, Yacoub A, Francis A. CPK measurements and ECT in polymyositis: a case report. J Psychiatr Pract. 2016;22(6):481–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Shah R, Grover S, Krishna K, Singh D. Use of modified electroconvulsive therapy in a case of polymyositis presenting with delusion of nihilism of proxy (Odysseus syndrome). J ECT. 2011;27(1):e32–e34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Ntatsaki E, D'Mello O, Lewis J, Underwood BR, Smith M, Head L. Electroconvulsive treatment for a patient with psychotic depression and inclusion body myositis. J ECT. 2009;25(2):125–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Martins S, Quarenta J, Teixeira T, Pinheiro J. Electroconvulsive therapy after conservative treatment of vertebral fractures. Eur Psychiatry. 2021;64(S1):S781. [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Dighe‐Deo D, Shah A. Electroconvulsive therapy in patients with long bone fractures. J ECT. 1998;14(2):115–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Alby E, Bhat R. Electroconvulsive therapy after division and repair of strap muscle and anterior jugular vein. J ECT. 2014;30(3):e32–e33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Bhat T, Pande N, Shah N, Andrade C. Safety of repeated courses of electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with harrington rods. J ECT. 2007;23(2):106–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Dolenc TJ, Barnes RD, Hayes DL, Rasmussen KG. Electroconvulsive therapy in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(9):1257–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Kokras N, Politis AM, Zervas IM, Pappa D, Markatou M, Katirtzoglou E, et al. Cardiac rhythm management devices and electroconvulsive therapy: a critical review apropos of a depressed patient with a pacemaker. J ECT. 2011;27(3):214–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. MacPherson RD, Loo CK, Barrett N. Electroconvulsive therapy in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34(4):470–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Peroski MS, Chu MM, Doddi SR, Regenold WT. The safety of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with implanted deep brain stimulators: a review of the literature and case report. J ECT. 2019;35(2):84–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Malek‐Ahmadi P, Hanretta AT. Cochlear implant and ECT. J ECT. 2003;19(1):51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Albertsen LN, Lauridsen JK. A review electroconvulsive therapy in cochlear implant patients. J ECT. 2022;38(1):10–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Veigne S, Ahmad M. Electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) in the presence of titanium cochlear implant: a case report. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;29(4):S91. [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Yonkers KA, Wisner KL, Stewart DE, Oberlander TF, Dell DL, Stotland N, et al. The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gen Hosp Psychistry. 2009;31(5):403–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Coshal S, Jones K, Coverdale J, Livingston R. An overview of reviews on the safety of electroconvulsive therapy administered during pregnancy. J Psychiatr Pract. 2019;25(1):2–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Sinha P, Goyal P, Andrade C. A meta‐review of the safety of electroconvulsive therapy in pregnancy. J ECT. 2017;33(2):81–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Leiknes KA, Cooke MJ, Jarosch‐von Schweder L, Harboe I, Høie B. Electroconvulsive therapy during pregnancy: a systematic review of case studies. Arch Women Ment Health. 2015;18(1):1–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Balki M, Castro C, Ananthanarayan C. Status epilepticus after electroconvulsive therapy in a pregnant patient. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15(4):325–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Cipolla S, Catapano P, Messina M, Pezzella P, Giordano GM. Safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in pregnancy: a systematic review of case reports and case series. Arch Women Ment Health. 2024;27(2):157–178. 10.1007/s00737-023-01394-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Ward HB, Fromson JA, Cooper JJ, De Oliveira G, Almeida M. Recommendations for the use of ECT in pregnancy: literature review and proposed clinical protocol. Arch Women Ment Health. 2018;21(6):715–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Livingston J, Johnstone W Jr., Hadi H. Electroconvulsive therapy in a twin pregnancy: a case report. Am J Perinatol. 1994;11(2):116–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Walker R, Swartz CM. Electroconvulsive therapy during high‐risk pregnancy. Gen Hosp Psychistry. 1994;16(5):348–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Sackeim HA. The anticonvulsant hypothesis of the mechanisms of action of ECT: current status. J ECT. 1999;15(1):5–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Peters SG, Wochos DN, Peterson GC. Status epilepticus as a complication of concurrent electroconvulsive and theophylline therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59(8):568–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Rasmussen KG, Zorumski CF. Electroconvulsive therapy in patients taking theophylline. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993;54(11):427–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Kemp MF, Allard J, Pâquet M, Marcotte P. Impact of an oral theophylline loading dose pre‐electroconvulsive therapy: a retrospective study in patients with missed or inadequate seizures. J ECT. 2015;31(1):37–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Sartorius A, Wolf J, Henn FA. Lithium and ECT—concurrent use still demands attention: three case reports. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2005;6(2):121–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Weiner RD, Whanger AD, Erwin CW, Wilson WP. Prolonged confusional state and EEG seizure activity following concurrent ECT and lithium use. American J Psychiatry. 1980; 137(11):1452–1453. 10.1176/ajp.137.11.1452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Hill GE, Wong KC, Hodges MR. Potentiation of succinylcholine neuromuscular blockade by lithium carbonate. Anesthesiology. 1976;44(5):439–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Thirthalli J, Harish T, Gangadhar BN. A prospective comparative study of interaction between lithium and modified electroconvulsive therapy. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011;12(2):149–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Volpe FM, Tavares AR. Lithium plus ECT for mania in 90 cases: safety issues. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012;24:E33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Jahangard L, Haghighi M, Bigdelou G, Bajoghli H, Brand S. Comparing efficacy of ECT with and without concurrent sodium valproate therapy in manic patients. J ECT. 2012;28(2):118–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Rakesh G, Thirthalli J, Kumar CN, Muralidharan K, Phutane VH, Gangadhar BN. Concomitant anticonvulsants with bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial with clinical and neurobiological application. J ECT. 2017;33(1):16–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Cinderella MA, Nichols NA, Munjal S, Yan J, Kimball JN, Gligorovic P. Antiepileptics in electroconvulsive therapy: a mechanism‐based review of recent literature. J ECT. 2022;38(2):133–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Ottosson J‐O, Rendahl I. Intraocular pressure in electroconvulsive therapy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963;70(4):462–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Salvi JD, Iqbal M, Kotbi N, Francois D. Successful use of electroconvulsive therapy in the setting of multiple risk factors for retinal detachment. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2018;20(2):17l02190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Martínez‐Amorós E, Barrero ER, Fusares CF, Hernández‐Ribas R, Sarachaga MU. Bilateral posterior vitreous detachment after electroconvulsive therapy. Gen Hosp Psychistry. 2009;31(4):385–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Friedlander R, Francois D. Efficacious use of electroconvulsive therapy in the setting of previous retinal detachment. J ECT. 2020;36(4):e51–e52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Dubuc M, Li G, Tourjman SV. Electroconvulsive therapy after cataract surgery: a review of the literature and a report of 2 cases. J ECT. 2022;38(4):256–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Aneja J, Grover S, Agarwal M, Kaushik S. Use of electroconvulsive therapy in the presence of glaucoma: a case report and review of literature. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(1):80–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Kadar AG, Ing CH, White PF, Wakefield CA, Kramer BA, Clark K. Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy in obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(2):360–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Koyama Y, Tsuzaki K, Suzuki T, Ozaki M, Saito S. Prevention of oxygen desaturation in morbidly obese patients during electroconvulsive therapy: a narrative review. J ECT. 2020;36(3):161–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Malaty G, Godbe K, Elmouchtari M, Malhi G, White J, Bankole A, et al. Electroconvulsive therapy in a renal transplantation patient: a rare combination of disease and treatment. Case Rep Psychiatry. 2020;2020:8889883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Wille PD. Electroconvulsive therapy in a patient on chronic hemodialysis. Nephrol Nurs J. 2007;34(4):441–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Williams S, Ostroff R. Chronic renal failure, hemodialysis, and electroconvulsive therapy: a case report. J ECT. 2005;21(1):41–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Al Subhi AR, Boyle V, Elston MS. Systematic review: incidence of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma over 70 years. J Endocr Soc. 2022;6(9):bvac105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Drake FR, Ebaugh FG. Pheochromocytoma and electroconvulsive therapy; case report. Am J Psychiatry. 1956;113(4):295–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Carr ME Jr., Woods JW. Electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with unsuspected pheochromocytoma. South Med J. 1985;78(5):613–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Rasheed HA, Cohenmehr J, Chen ST. Electroconvulsive therapy with titanium‐based uveoscleral stents. J ECT. 2022;38(4):262–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Mueller PS, Schak KM, Barnes RD, Rasmussen KG. Safety of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with asthma. Neth J Med. 2006;64(11):417–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Schak KM, Mueller PS, Barnes RD, Rasmussen KG. The safety of ECT in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Psychosomatics. 2008;49(3):208–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Mirás VeigaVeiga A, Moreno D, Menéndez A, Siscart I, Fernández M, et al. Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy for refractory status epilepticus in febrile infection–related epilepsy syndrome. Neuropediatrics. 2017;48(01):045–048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Braithwaite R, McKeown HL, Lawrence VJ, Cramer O. Successful electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with confirmed, symptomatic COVID‐19. J ECT. 2020;36(3):222–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Maddox A, Horowitz M, Wishart J, Collins P. Gastric and oesophageal emptying in obesity. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989;24(5):593–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Surve R, Bansal S, Sriganesh K, Subbakrishna D, Thirthalli J, Umamaheswara Rao G. Incidence and risk factors for oxygen desaturation during recovery from modified electroconvulsive therapy: a prospective observational study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31(1):99–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Butler B, Carr B, Zhang V. Individualized ECT succinylcholine dosing in a morbidly obese patient. Brain Stimul. 2023;16(1):407. [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Muldoon SM, Theye RA. The effects of succinylcholine and d‐tubocurarine on oxygen consumption. Anesthesiology. 1969;31(5):437–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Kerner N, Prudic J. Current electroconvulsive therapy practice and research in the geriatric population. Neuropsychiatry. 2014;4(1):33–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Castaneda‐Ramirez S, Becker TD, Bruges‐Boude A, Kellner C, Rice TR. Systematic review: electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant mood disorders in children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023;32(9):1529–1560. 10.1007/s00787-022-01942-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Døssing E, Pagsberg AK. Electroconvulsive therapy in children and adolescents: a systematic review of current literature and guidelines. J ECT. 2021;37(3):158–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper.


Articles from PCN Reports: Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences are provided here courtesy of John Wiley & Sons Australia and Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology

RESOURCES