Table 8.
Comparative analysis of fabricated prototype with recent pioneer state of art.
| Refs. | Substrate material | Number of bands | Resonance frequency (GHz) | Gain (dB) | Size of antenna (mm2) | Design type | Design complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Textile | Single | 2.45 | 6.2 | 72.4 × 65.5 | Electromagnetically-coupled patch | Medium |
| 22 | Textile | Dual |
0.915 2.45 |
6.84 | 48 × 52 | Patch with monopole | Medium |
| 23 | Textile | Single | 2.45 | 4.7 | 140 × 70 | Dual Patch | Simple |
| 24 | Textile | Single | 2.4 | 1 | Patch size: 40.1 × 40.1 | Square patch | Medium |
| 25 | Textile | Single | 2.45 | 7.46 | 82.4 × 35.4 | EBG structure | Medium |
| 26 | Polyimide | Triple |
1.31 3.55 5.25 |
4.39 | 55 × 42 | Toroidal | Medium |
| 27 | Polyethylene | Single | 2.45 | – | 38.5 × 25 | Coplanar | High |
| 28 | Ultra-lam 3850 | Dual |
2.4 7.48 |
2.36 3.1 |
50 × 35 | Slotted circular disc patch with partial ground | Medium |
| Proposed design | Textile | Single | 2.5 | 1.73 | 40.35 × 23.57 | Rectangular | Simple |