Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 3;9(1):e70046. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70046

Table 3.

Comparison of Phase Angle and Wellness Marker between Patients with and without Perioperative Complications

Perioperative complications Yes1 No1 P value2
Pneumonia
Phase angle (°) 4.70 [3.55‐5.80] 6.20 [4.90‐7.10] .062
N = 8 N = 45
Wellness marker (Hz)

0.84 [0.83‐0.87]

0.79 [0.77‐0.84]

.020
N = 7 N = 45
Surgical site infections
Phase angle (°) 6.30 [5.65‐6.75] 5.80 [4.30‐7.10] .5
N = 11 N = 41
Wellness marker (Hz) 0.79 [0.78‐0.81] 0.80 [0.77‐0.84] .5
N = 11 N = 40
Salivary leak/fistula
Phase angle (°) 5.95 [5.73‐6.18] 6.00 [4.63‐7.10] >.9
N = 2 N = 50
Wellness marker (Hz) 0.80 [0.79‐0.81] 0.80 [0.77‐0.84] >.9
N = 2 N = 49
Flap complications
Phase angle (°) 6.00 [5.25‐6.55] 6.00 [4.60‐7.10] >.9
N = 7 N = 45
Wellness marker (Hz) 0.80 [0.79‐0.84] 0.80 [0.77‐0.84] .7
N = 6 N = 45

Denominators that do not equal the sample sizes are due to missing data.

a

Median [IQR].

b

Wilcoxon rank sum test.