Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 2;15:593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84301-7

Table 2.

Detailed evaluation metrics for disc state classification of ROI images, comparing performance with and without fine-tuned models.

Models Accuracy with fine-tuning (%) Accuracy without fine-tuning (%) AUC (%) Specificity (%) Precision (%) Recall (%) F1-score (%)
VGG16 89.87 81.01 82.98 100 100 65.96 79.49
VGG19 92.41 82.28 87.23 100 100 74.47 85.37
ResNet50 96.84 94.94 95.91 98.20 95.65 93.62 94.62
DenseNet121 93.04 89.24 88.91 99.09 97.37 78.73 87.06
InceptionV3 93.03 92.41 91.98 94.60 87.50 89.36 88.42
Xception 96.84 90.51 96.52 97.30 93.75 95.75 94.74
AEM 98.10 93.67 96.81 100 100 93.62 96.70
WAEM 99.37 96.84 98.94 100 100 97.87 98.93