Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 6;10(24):e40897. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40897

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of participants.

Evaluated items
CDA (n = 257)
SDA (n = 21)
p
Age (years) 71.6 ± 5.4 71.3 ± 4.0 0.21
Gender (Male) 81 (31.5%) 8 (38.1%) 0.79
Num. of Functional teetha 28.0 ± 0.0 23.5 ± 0.7 <0.001
Masticatory performance (score) 5.4 ± 0.1 3.8 ± 0.4 <0.001
Occlusal force (kgf)a 83.5 ± 2.2 60.1 ± 5.1 0.003
Oral cleanliness (Lv) 4.9 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.3 0.07
Oral dryness 26.7 ± 0.3 26.3 ± 1.1 0.71
Tongue pressure (kPa) 32.4 ± 0.5 30.5 ± 1.3 0.28

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, or number of participants (%).

CDA: Complete dental arch.

SDA: shortened dental arch.

Number of functional teeth: Natural teeth and treated teeth that have a crown, excluding bridge pontics and implants.

Masticatory performance (Score): Gummy jelly score evaluation by visual inspection.

Occlusal force (kgf): Measured by the occlusal force meter.

Oral cleanliness (Lv): Bacterial count (Level 1–7) on the tongue surface using a dielectrophoretic impedance measurement method.

Oral dryness: Maximum value of two measurements on the tongue using an oral moisture meter.

Tongue pressure (kPa): Maximum value obtained from two measurements using the JMS tongue pressure meter.

p: Comparison of CDA and SDA by Mann-Whitney U test.

a

Significant difference between CDA and SDA, by the Mann-Whitney U test or χ-square test.