Table XII.
Model Inputs for the Northern India Model
Model input (symbol) | Best estimate | Source | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Number of subpopulations (Bihar) | 1 | ||
Number of subpopulations (WUP) | 2 | Subpopulation 1: undervaccinated subgroups (1/25th) of total WUP population; subpopulation 2: general population (24/25th) of total WUP population | |
Relative population size compared to all of India | 125 | According to the 2011 census, approximately 1.2 billion live in all of India, 104 million in Bihar, and 71 million in included districts for WUPa | |
- Bihar | 0.086 | ||
- WUP | 0.059 | ||
Number of age groups | 9 | 0–2; 3–11 months; 1; 2; 3; 4; 5–9; 10–14; ≥ 15* years | |
Number of mixing age groups | 3 | 0–4; 5–14; ≥ 15 years | |
Year when model run-up starts | 1950 | ||
Year when R0 seasonality starts | 1965 | ||
Year when die-out first allowed | 1965 | ||
Average basic reproductive number (R0) (PV1) | 13 | Fitted within range for lowest tier (Table III); PV2&3 according to ratios in Table I | |
Proportional change in R0 due to seasonality () | 0.25 | Seasonality modeled as step function | |
Day of seasonal peak in R0(pd) | 195 (July 14) | ||
Proportion of contacts reserved for individuals within the same mixing age group () | 0.35 | For simplicity, assume equal values for each mixing age group | |
Proportion of transmissions via oropharyngeal route () | 0.3 | Based on average of mean expert assessments for community and close contacts for type 1 in high R0 settings(19) | |
Proportion of potentially infectious contacts of individuals in subpopulation 1 in WUP that are with other individuals in subpopulation 1 in WUP (pwithin) | 0.95 | Force of infection as a result of mixing between subpopulations modeled using previously described approach;(13) (see Appendix A1) model does not include mixing between Bihar and WUP | |
Per-dose take rate (tr) (PV1;PV2;PV3) | |||
- tOPV | 0.35;0.50;0.30 | ||
- mOPV | 0.50;NA;0.45 | ||
- bOPV | 0.45;NA;040 | ||
Routine coverage with 3 or more doses by 1 year of age, birth dose coverage, and partial coverage | Time series 1980–2012 | 89 | |
Characterization of routine tOPV vaccination, 1980–2012 | 89 | Primary nonbirth doses at 6–10–14 weeks modeled as the cumulative effect of all 3 nonbirth doses upon entering the 3–11-months-old age group, taking into account partial coverage | |
- Doses at birth | 1 | ||
- Cumulative effect of 3 primary nonbirth doses at ages (months) | 3 | ||
Characterization of SIAs 1995–2012 | See Appendix A4 for effective per-round impact assumptions by year and subpopulation in the absence of good data and resulting annual cumulative percentages of missed children | ||
- Dates, durations, and target population of SIAs | Time seriesb | ||
- Effective per-round impact () | Varies | ||
- Target age groups | 0–4 years | ||
Date of introduction of WPV3 into Bihar for 2007 outbreak | January 1, 2007 |
Acronyms: bOPV = bivalent OPV; mOPV = monovalent OPV; OPV = oral poliovirus vaccine; PV1,2,3 = poliovirus type 1, 2, and 3, respectively; SIA = supplemental immunization activity; tOPV = trivalent OPV; WUP = Western Uttar Pradesh
Age groups marked with an asterisk indicate age groups that count towards determining the fraction of newborns who receive maternal antibodies, based on the immune fraction in those age groups (see Appendix A1).
We included the following districts: Agra, Aligarh, Baghpat, Bareilly, Bijnor, Budaun, Bulandshahr, Etah, Etawah, Farrukhabad, Firozabad, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Ghaziabad, Jyotiba Phule Nagar, Kanshiram Nagar, Mahamaya Nagar, Mainpuri, Mathura, Meerut, Moradabad, Muzaffarnagar, Pilibhit, Rampur, Saharanpur, Shahjahanpur.