Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 4;15:830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85573-3

Table 8.

Association between TDIs and patients’ characteristics utilizing multi-regression analysis. Each explanatory variable was studied without adding the other variables. Values are number (95% CI).

OR p-value
Occlusal stage Primary dentition 3.640 (1.47–8.95) 0.005 *
Mixed dentition 1**
Age (years) 4–6 2.140 (0.70–6.53) 0.180
7–9 0.444 (0.11–1.78) 0.252
10–13 1**
the resident’s assessment of the difficulty of intubation Difficult 1**
Not difficult 0.020 (0.01–0.08) 0.001 *
Occlusal classification of intermolar relationship Class I 0.286 (0.04–1.82) 0.185
Class II 0.923 (0.12–6.78) 0.937
Class III 6.000 (0.56–63.98) 0.138
Straight line 0.364 (0.02–4.73) 0.440
Mesial step 1.200 (0.22–6.62) 0.816
Distal step 1**
Mallampati score I 0.074 (0.01–0.36) 0.001 *
II 0.133 (0.03–0.53) 0.004 *
III 0.909 (0.29–2.79) 0.868
IV 1**
Gingivitis Yes 2.700 (1.09–6.67) 0.030 *
No 1**
Number of attempts 2.270 (1.65–3.13) 0.001 *
Inter-incisor distance (cm) 0.222 (0.09–0.49) 0.001 *
The distance between the mental and thyroid cartilage (cm) 0.629 (0.42–0.94) 0.024 *

TDIs, traumatic dental injuries; CI, confidence intervals, OR, odds ratios; **, the reference; *, significant difference p-value < 0.05, p-values written in bold are statistically significant (p < 0.05).