Table 1.
Extraction method of luteolin.
| Abstraction technics | Raw material | Extraction time | Conventional process temperature (°C) | Extraction efficiency(%)/content(mg/g) | Process characteristics | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impregnation extraction method | Viticis leaves | >72 h | 40 | 9.4 % | Mild, low cost; low extraction efficiency and long extraction time. | [4] |
| Solvent extraction- Soxhlet extraction | Viticis leaves | 2 h | 50 | 14.5 % | Automatic continuous process, less solvent consumption | [4] |
| ultrasonic assisted method | Lobelia chinensis | 30 min | 50 | 0.323 ± 0.014 mg/g | The operation is simple and convenient; the extraction time, temperature and solvent consumption were reduced. | [11] |
| Peanut shell | 15 min | 60 | 1409 mg/g | [12] | ||
| supercritical fluid extraction | – | – | – | 6.56 % | High efficiency, not easy to oxidize, pure natural, no chemical pollution. | [14] |
| microwave-assisted method | Peony pod | >4 h | 66 | 0.151 mg/g | High repeatability, simplified operation, reduced solvent consumption, reduced energy input | [18] |
| Alkali destruction technology (natural deep eutectic solvent) | Peanut shell | 105 min | 80 | 23.33 mg Rutin equivalent/g | It is helpful for flavonoid recovery, high extraction efficiency, and maintaining the antioxidant activity of the extract. | [168] |
| ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction method | celery | 30 min | 25∼30 | 9.31 mg/g | The extraction efficiency is high and meets the high performance and economic requirements of the extraction process. | [22] |