Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 4;24:6. doi: 10.1186/s12934-024-02604-w

Table 4.

Comparison of the inhibition zone of different antibiotics alone and inhibition zone of different antibiotics with silver and selenium nanoparticles on S. aureus

Modes of action Percentage of antibiotic resistance (%) Inhibition zone (mean ± SD) mm Increased fold (%) with AgNPs Inhibition zone (mean ± SD) mm Increased fold (%) with SeNPs
A B B
Antibiotic alone Antibiotic + AgNPs (B − A)/A) × 100 Antibiotic + SeNPs (B − A)/A) × 100
Protein inhibition Gentamycin 66.67% 8.75 ± 9.92 4 ± 3.85 − 50 18.72 ± 5.93 113.9
Erythromycin 94.44% 7.22 ± 5.11 17.89 ± 6.19 147 13.11 ± 5.93 81.5
Nitrofurantoin 33.33% 15.89 ± 7.86 20.39 ± 4.09 28.3 20.56 ± 5.50 29.3
Tetracycline 83.33% 9.0 ± 6.81 19.28 ± 4.05 114.2 16.11 ± 6.25 79
Clindamycin 94.44% 9.0 ± 6.21 18.94 ± 5.98 110.4 11.56 ± 7.28 28.4
Chloramphenicol 44.44% 13.31 ± 11.30 22.44 ± 4.97 68.3 21.89 ± 5.30 64.4
Quinapristin 88.89% 12.28 ± 6.79 20.11 ± 3.53 63.7 15.89 ± 6.48 29.2
Linzolid 94.44% 13.11 ± 6.48 19.94 ± 4.20 52 15.39 ± 6.52 17.3
Metabolic path inhibition Trimethoprim 94.44% 8.67 ± 6.97 19.39 ± 5.05 123.6 16.33 ± 7.75 88.3
Nucleic acid inhibition Ciprofloxacin 44.44% 12.80 ± 9.78 20.22 ± 5.20 57.8 21.94 ± 5.58 71.4
Rifampicin 88.89% 11.5 ± 6.27 20.17 ± 2.99 75.3 18.72 ± 4.56 62.7
Cell wall inhibition Cefoxitin 100% 10.11 ± 4.65 16.44 ± 5.52 62.6 14.67 ± 4.43 45.1