Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 4;24:6. doi: 10.1186/s12934-024-02604-w

Table 5.

Comparison of the inhibition zone of different antibiotics alone and inhibition zone of different antibiotics with silver and selenium nanoparticles on P. aeuroginosa

Mode of action Percentage of antibiotic resistance (%) Inhibition zone (mean ± SD) mm Increased fold (%) with AgNPs Inhibition zone (mean ± SD) mm Increased fold (%) with SeNPs
A B B
Antibiotic alone Antibiotic + AgNPs (B − A) ⁄ A) × 100 Antibiotic + SeNPs (B − A) ⁄ A) × 100
Cell wall inhibition Piperacillin 86.96% 9.49 ± 6.79 17.35 ± 6.11 182 16.91 ± 5.22 78
Pipertazobactam 47.83% 14.26 ± 8.75 20.70 ± 4.48 45 20.22 ± 5.10 41.7
Ceftazidime 82.61% 5.61 ± 7.26 14.09 ± 8.03 150 15.48 ± 4.60 175
Colistin 34.78% 11.17 ± 6.50 18.65 ± 3.52 66.9 19.65 ± 4.11 75.9
Impenem 21.74% 19.26 ± 6.71 23.48 ± 5.39 21.9 16.30 ± 7.11 − 15.3
Aztreonam 91.30% 7.70 ± 6.58 16.96 ± 6.87 120 14.57 ± 6.95 89.2
Meropenem 47.83% 13.30 ± 11.24 21.78 ± 8.66 63.7 22.39 ± 7.03 68.3
Protein inhibition Gentamycin 21.74% 11.5 ± 5.37 18.04 ± 4.49 48 20.13 ± 6.28 49
DNA inhibition Ciprofloxacin 52.17% 12.57 ± 9.38 21.13 ± 6.21 67.8 22.35 ± 7.23 77.8