Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 5;14(1):e70567. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70567

TABLE 5.

Stratified survival analysis of UTUC with DM patients.

Stratification OS CSS BRFS
aHR (95% CI) p aHR (95% CI) p aHR (95% CI) p
Pathological T stage
≥ T2 0.698 (0.500–0.975) 0.035* 0.676 (0.439–1.040) 0.075 1.158 (0.835–1.607) 0.379
< T2 0.449 (0.278–0.722) 0.001* 0.432 (0.152–1.227) 0.115 0.772 (0.524–1.138) 0.192
Metastasis
No 0.630 (0.444–0.894) 0.010* 0.813 (0.356–1.852) 0.621 1.080 (0.814–1.433) 0.595
Yes 0.537 (0.348–0.827) 0.005* 0.578 (0.368–0.907) 0.017* 0.756 (0.456–1.254) 0.279
Grade
High grade 0.566 (0.421–0.760) < 0.001* 0.608 (0.404–0.913) 0.017* 0.959 (0.730–1.26) 0.765
Low grade 0.693 (0.306–1.568) 0.378 1.525 (0.094–24.618) 0.766 1.192 (0.615–2.311) 0.603
LVI
LVI 0.483 (0.281–0.829) 0.008* 0.555 (0.280–1.101) 0.092 0.728 (0.419–1.265) 0.260
Non‐LVI 0.677 (0.495–0.926) 0.015* 0.695 (0.429–1.127) 0.140 1.056 (0.799–1.396) 0.702

Note: Compare Kaplan–Meier curves between patients with and without metformin by log‐rank test. Adjusted age, Metastasis, pT, and LVI.

Abbreviations: BRFS, bladder recurrence‐free survival; CI, confidence interval; CSS, cancer‐specific survival; HR, hazard ratio; LVI, Lymphovascular invasion; OS, overall survival.

*

p < 0.05.