Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 1;59(2):168–176. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001985

TABLE 2.

The Correlation Between Different Types of PA and CAP

Variables Model 1 β (95% CI)
P
Model 2 β (95% CI)
P
Model 3 β (95% CI)
P
Total PA −0.026 (−0.039, −0.012) 0.00019 −0.030 (−0.043, −0.016) 0.00002 −0.011 (−0.021, 0.000) 0.05167
Leisure-time PA −0.248 (−0.305, −0.192) <0.00001 −0.261 (−0.318, −0.205) <0.00001 −0.063 (−0.107, −0.018) 0.00549
Occupation-related PA −0.013 (−0.028, 0.002) 0.08392 −0.015 (−0.030, −0.000) 0.04337 −0.008 (−0.019, 0.004) 0.18324
Transportation-related PA −0.026 (−0.131, 0.079) 0.63232 −0.049 (−0.152, 0.055) 0.35689 −0.009 (−0.088, 0.071) 0.83186

Result variable: CAP, controlled attenuation parameter.

Exposure variable: different types of physical activity.

Model 1: no covariates were adjusted. Model 2: age, gender, and race were adjusted. Model 3: age, gender, race, educational level, smoking status, BMI, ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-C, UA, CRP, and glycohemoglobin were adjusted.