TABLE 5.

The Correlation Between Different Types of PA and LSM

Variables	Model 1 β (95% CI) P	Model 2 β (95% CI) P	Model 3 β (95% CI) P
Total PA	−0.001 (−0.002, 0.000) 0.20145	−0.001 (−0.002, 0.000) 0.05319	−0.001 (−0.002, 0.000) 0.28150
Leisure-time PA	−0.009 (−0.013, −0.005) 0.00001	−0.011 (−0.015, −0.006) <0.00001	−0.004 (−0.008, 0.000) 0.06947
Occupation-related PA	−0.000 (−0.001, 0.001) 0.69497	−0.000 (−0.002, 0.001) 0.37078	−0.000 (−0.001, 0.001) 0.39264
Transportation-related PA	0.004 (−0.004, 0.012) 0.30872	0.003 (−0.005, 0.011) 0.44081	0.004 (−0.003, 0.012) 0.22965

Result variable: LSM, liver stiffness measure.

Exposure variable: different types of physical activity.

Model 1: no covariates were adjusted. Model 2: age, gender, and race were adjusted. Model 3: age, gender, race, educational level, smoking status, BMI, WHR, ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-C, UA, CRP, and glycohemoglobin were adjusted.

In the subgroup analysis stratified by gender and age, the model is not adjusted for gender and age, respectively.