Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2025 Jan 6;5(1):e0003966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003966

Modelling the health labour market outlook in Kenya: Supply, needs and investment requirements for health workers, 2021–2035

James Avoka Asamani 1,2,*, Brendan Kwesiga 3, Sunny C Okoroafor 1, Evalyne Chagina 4, Joel Gondi 5, Zeinab Gura 5, Francis Motiri 5, Nakato Jumba 5, Teresa Ogumbo 5, Nkatha Mutungi 5, Stephen Muleshe 5, Yusuf Suraw 5, Hanah Gitungo 5, Kiogora Gatimbu 5, Mutile Wanyee 5, Amos Oyoko 5, Angela Nyakundi 5, Stephen Kaboro 5, Mary Wanjiru Njogu 5, Maureen Monyoncho 5, Njoroge Nyoike 6, Wesley Ogera Ooga 5, Juliet Nabyonga-Orem 2,7, Julius Korir 8, Paul Marsden 9, Mona Almudhwahi Ahmed 4, Julius Ogato 5, Pascal Zurn 9, Annah Wamae 5
Editor: Ikechi G Okpechi10
PMCID: PMC11703116  PMID: 39761292

Abstract

Kenya is committed to achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) within its devolved health system in which significant investments have been made in health infrastructure, workforce development, and service delivery. Despite these efforts, the country faces considerable health workforce challenges. To address these, the Ministry of Health undertook a comprehensive Health Labour Market Analysis (HLMA) in 2022 to generate evidence supporting the development of responsive health workforce policies. This paper presents findings of a modelling exercise to understand the health labour market outlook. As part of a comprehensive HLMA, a validated needs-based health workforce modelling framework was applied to project the supply, needs, and investment requirements. Data was triangulated from multiple sources through desk reviews and group modelling by an expert technical working group constituted to undertake the study. The analysis considered disease burden, population growth, service delivery models, and health worker productivity, to assess the future health workforce needed. Kenya’s health workforce is growing, with approximately 7,650 new workers added annually, resulting in an estimated 3.4% annual growth. By 2025, the health workforce is projected to reach 226,434, increasing to 263,700 by 2030. However, Kenya required a minimum of 254,220 health workers in 2021 to make substantial progress toward UHC. The cumulative need could rise to 476,278 by 2035. In 2021, Kenya had a needs-based shortage of nearly 60,000 health professionals, which could increase to 114,352 by 2030. The financial space for health workforce was estimated at US$2.29 billion in 2021 and is projected to rise to US$3.58 billion by 2030, but the required wage bill potentially reaching US$3.9 billion. Kenya must significantly increase investments in its health workforce to meet UHC goals. Both public and private sectors need to contribute more, with the public sector requiring a health workforce budget increase of 10.5% annually to bridge the projected funding gap.

Introduction

Over the years, the WHO African Region has made modest strides in expanding its training and production capacity and its stock of health professionals. There are more than 4,000 institutions that provide health professions education and training. From 2005 to 2020, medical schools increased from 168 to 401, and there are at least 2,122 nursing and midwifery schools in 43 Member States where data is available. With the expansion of the training infrastructure, training output has increased proportionally. For instance, the number of trained physicians has increased from 6,000 per year in 2005 to more than 30,000 by 2022, and the number of trained nurses and midwives has increased from 26,000 per year in 2005 to at least 151,000 per year [13]. The WHO African Region’s health workforce stock has risen to 5.1 million in 2022 compared to 4.3 million in 2018 [3].

Despite the progress in increasing the stock of health workers from 1.6 million in 2013 to 5.1 million in 2022, the WHO African Region needs more than 6.1 million alongside addressing the maldistribution of the available health workers to achieve UHC by 2030 [4,5]. As a result, 37 out of 55 countries on the WHO’s Safeguard and Support List (SSL) are in the African region [6,7]. In addition, even though over 255,000 health workers are trained annually in Africa, absorption capacity (i.e., financial ability and willingness of countries to pay for health workers in its efforts to meet the population’s health need) remains challenged due to limited fiscal space for health employment [3] and budgetary space analysis suggesting a 43% funding gap in the public sector to employ the current supply of health workers in East and Southern Africa [8]. With this, the health worker shortage in Africa is decreasing much more slowly than in the rest of the world [9], leaving nearly one-third of trained healthcare professionals in Africa facing lengthy periods of unemployment, underemployment, and transient or casual employment (termed precarious work). On average, 22% of health professionals in the WHO African region are employed in the private sector, but the private sector represents 40% of the training capacity [10]. Thus, the private sector still needs to reach its maximum employment potential within the health workforce.

Kenya has been implementing the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) programme as a major political priority for the entire country in the context of a devolved health system. In the previous Government (2018 to 2022), the main tenets of the UHC programme were to progressively increase the percentage of Kenyans covered with essential health services under prepaid health financing mechanisms such as health insurance, subsidies and direct government funding to access health services, expanding the scope of the health benefit package, improving the quality of health services, retaining health resources appropriate for the delivery of health services and strengthening the leadership and governance within the health sector [1113]. Continuing with the same agenda of UHC, the new Government that came to power in 2022 emphasised the importance of Human Resources for Health, Primary Health Care, Health Commodity Security and Integrated Health Information System.

In line with the provisions of the Kenyan Constitution, which guarantees the right to health, the Government’s Vision 2030, operationalised through the 5-year Medium-Term Plans, recognises health as one of the components of delivering its Social Pillar by maintaining a healthy and skilled workforce necessary to drive the economy. It prioritises the development and employment of the health workforce as one of the main projects to achieve its goals.

Over the last decades, Kenya has more than doubled the density of doctors, nurses, midwives and clinical officers per 10,000 population from 14.47 in 2006 to 30.14 in 2021. At an annual average growth rate of 7%, access to health workers is increasing, but unemployment is also rising among the skilled health workforce in Kenya– estimated at 14% in 2021 [14]. Meanwhile, there are growing concerns about an escalating health sector wage bill, which increased by 44% between 2014/2015 and 2018/2019, from 4.97 billion Kenyan Shillings in the 2014/2015 fiscal year to 7.14 billion Kenyan Shillings in the 2018/2019 fiscal year [15]. Even though unfilled vacancies are apparent within Counties, the drive to commit more resources towards health workforce job creation appears to be dwindling amidst concerns that health service outputs and outcomes have not been meeting expectations. The Government of Kenya, since October 2019, has been holding a national wage bill and sustainability conference each year [16] to explore approaches to achieve a target of a 35% wage bill-to-revenue ratio [17] without necessarily compromising service delivery and job creation for the youth.

Against this backdrop, the National Human Resource for Health (HRH) Strategic plan prioritised the need to conduct a health labour market analysis and set up a productivity management system to make an investment and efficiency case to foster dialogue towards job creation in the health sector. This study was part of a more extensive assessment of the health labour market in Kenya and sought to model the supply, need and budget space requirements to address potential health labour market mismatches. The descriptive aspects of the health labour market analysis have been discussed elsewhere [14].

Methodology

Modelling the future supply and needs-based requirements for health workers

The policy issues identified in Kenya for modelling the health labour market included determining (1) how many health workers are anticipated to be in the health labour market in the future, (2) how many health workers will be needed to address the health needs of the population, and (3) the absorption capacity of the health system for sustainable employment of health workers.

In undertaking the modelling, an empirical framework for integrated analysis of HWF supply, needs and economic feasibility was applied (Fig 1) [18] and leveraged a published simulation tool built in Microsoft Excel [19]. As health workforce modelling is complex and requires multi-dimensional skills, the Technical Working Group (TWG) worked with experts from various aspects of healthcare and other sectors, including epidemiologists, public health experts, clinicians from diverse backgrounds (doctors, nurses, midwives, clinical officers, pharmacists, laboratory scientist, and nutritionist among others), statisticians, economists, and human resource management. A group modelling approach was adopted in which the team worked in smaller teams in a dedicated two-week working session, with guidance and technical support from WHO technical experts.

Fig 1. Analytical framework for the supply and needs-based health workforce forecasting.

Fig 1

Source: adapted from Asamani et al. [19].

Three specific estimations were made for the (a) supply of health workforce, (b) the needs-based requirements for health workforce and (c) cost and economic feasibility. The technical methodology for these estimations has been adequately described elsewhere in the literature [5,1823], hence are briefly highlighted in this section.

Modelling the supply of health workers.

Building on the stock and labour flow information on the health workforce, the future supply of health workers was projected using a stock-and-flow methodology, as illustrated in equation (1).

Sn,t=Tn,t1× 1an +In × P equation 1

In this equation, Sn,t refers to the supply of health worker of category n, at time t, Tn,t is the aggregate stock of health worker of category n at time t, an represents the attrition rate (a proportion of the stock, Tn,t-1 that died, retired, could not work due to ill-health or migrated out), In is the inflows of health worker of category n trained domestically or immigrating from another country while P is the labour participation rate or the proportion of the health workers willing to engage in professional practice.

Modelling the needs-based requirements for health workers.

There are several methods for determining the ‘needed’ health workforce in a country [24], but the Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health recommends a needs-based approach that aligns investments to population health needs [25]. The health needs-based or epidemiology approach was adopted with the assumption that the need for health workers in Kenya depended on the ‘need for health services’ as defined by the disease burden and structure of the population alongside the health service delivery model of the country [26,27]. The following technical steps were followed to determine the need for health workers.

Estimating the populations’ ‘need for health services’. It was prioritised to quantify the ‘need for health service’ that covers at least 95% of the burden of diseases and risk factors. The list of diseases and risk factors that account for 95% of morbidity and mortalities was identified using data from the country’s health information system. A team of epidemiologists and statisticians then conducted a desk review to obtain the prevalence rates of the diseases and risk factors and the targets of the coverage rates of priority public health interventions (S1 Data). The disease burden and the risk factors were mapped using the routine health information from the Kenya Health Information System (KHIS), Kenya Demographic Health Survey (KDHS), Kenya Household Survey, and Mid Term Review of the Kenya Health Sector Strategic Plan. Desk review of prevalence estimates was undertaken from the aforementioned sources and complemented with evidence peer-reviewed scientific papers. A separate team of clinical experts were divided into three groups – Communicable diseases (CD) team, Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) team, and Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (RMNCAH) team who worked together to identify the planned or otherwise necessary health intervention to address each of the diseases and risk factors identified as well as the health worker occupational group that has the competency to deliver the interventions. The team also identified the appropriate population cohorts (demographic groups, gender, and location) to benefit from the interventions (services). These clinician-led works were combined to compute the needs-based service requirements using equation 2.

NHSt=Pi,j,g,t ×  [ Hh,i,j,t1  ×  1+Rh]  ×  Ly,h,i,j,t equation 2

In equation 2, NHSt represents the ‘Needed Health Services’ by a given population under a given service delivery model, Li,j,t over a period of time t, Pi,j,g,t represents the size of the given population of age cohort i, gender j in location (rural or urban) g at time t (i.e., population and its demographic characteristics), Hh,i,j,g,t represents the proportion of the given population with health status h, of age cohort i, gender j in location g at time t (i.e., the level of health of the population), Rh is the instantaneous rate of change of the health status, h while Ly,h,i,j,g,t represents the frequency of health services of type y planned or otherwise required, under a specified service model, to address the needs of individuals of health status h among age cohort i, gender j in location g over time t (i.e., the level of service required by the population).

Translating the need for health service into needs-based staffing requirements: Leveraging past and ongoing WISN studies in Kenya and augmented with experience from other countries, a standard workload was determined for each health intervention identified by the clinical expert teams (see equation 3). A standard workload, akin to a measure of productivity, is the volume of work within one health service activity that one health worker can accomplish within a year to acceptable professional standards [28]. The estimated “need for health services’ was then translated into the health workforce using the standard work (see equation 4).

SWn,y=AWTnSSy,n equation 3

In equation 3, SWn,y represents the standard workload for health professionals of category n when performing health service activity y while AWTn represents the annual available working time of the health professional of category n and SSy,n represents the Service Standard or the time it takes a well-trained health professional of category n to deliver the service activity, y.

Needsbased HWF requirementsn,y=NHSn,y,tSWn,y equation 4

In equation 4, NHSt represents the number of needed health service activity y, to be delivered by a health professional of category n at time t while SWn,y is the standard workload for health professionals of category n when performing health service activity y.

Modelling the absorption capacity (financial space) for the health workforce.

The absorption capacity to employ health workers is reflected in a country’s ability and willingness to pay for health workers in its efforts to meet the population’s health needs. Thus, the absorption capacity for health workers is a part of the joint financial capacity of the Government, development partners and the private sector in purchasing health care services, in which the cost of health workers’ wages represents a substantial proportion [29]. The assumption underlying this approach is that countries (governments and partners) will not necessarily spend on healthcare more than they can afford, even if their health or level of health utilisation is suboptimal relative to internationally established metrics [30]. Therefore, demand for health workers can be gauged using fiscal space for the wage bill as a proxy and adjusting for the private sector contribution to HWF employment (equation 6). Analysis of the health sector budget was undertaken to gauge the level of prioritisation of the HWF within the successive budgets.

Public sector HRH budget space for the year, i=GGHEas%GDPi*NominalGDPValuesi XHRHExpenditureas%GGHEi equation 5
Cumulative financial space for the year, i =PublicSectorFiscalSpaceIX(1+proportionofprivatesectorHRHemployment) equation 6

Whereby i is the target year, GGHE represents the General Government Health Expenditure, and GDP is the Gross Domestic Product. In this equation, it was conservatively assumed that if the Government continued to spend a similar proportion of GDP on health and a similar proportion of GGHE on HRH, all other things being equal, the fiscal space for HRH would be proportional to the size of the GDP. It was further assumed that the private sector would not contract and that a conservatively similar proportion of private-sector employment would continue.

Validation and consensus building

The technical working group, with guidance from WHO experts, held a five-day working session to review, validate, and discuss the data and findings in terms of accuracy and appropriateness. Thereafter, recommendations and concrete policy actions were finalised and submitted to MOH with the view of convening a multisectoral, multistakeholder dialogue on health workforce investment.

Data sources, validation and quality assurance

Data were triangulated from multiple sources to apply the model (as described above) in Kenya. Table 1 shows a summary of the sources from which data was obtained and inputted into the Microsoft Excel-based model [21] – S1 Data.

Table 1. Data sources for model application.

Dimension for model application Parameter(s) Data source(s)
Population size and demographics
  • Population size

  • Gender distribution

  • Age composition (age cohorts)

  • Geographical distribution (county, rural and urban)

  • Kenya Population and Housing Census Report and Projections, 2019

Level of health (disease burden)
  • Prevalence or incidence of diseases and risk factors that constitute 98% of the burden of mortalities, outpatient attendance and hospital admissions in Kenya

  • Coverage rates of essential public health interventions.

  • Global Burden of Disease Study [31]

  • Kenya Demographic and Health Survey reports

  • Midterm review report of Kenya Health Sector Strategic Plan (KHSSP) 2018–2023

  • Kenya Master Facility List

  • Kenya Health Information System database

  • Various peer-reviewed publications

Level of service
  • The main health services that were being provided or were otherwise necessary to address the diseases and risk factors identified

  • Kenya Essential Package of Health Services

  • Human Resources for Health Norms and Standards 2014

  • Expert opinion from the technical working group

Standard workloads
  • The main tasks performed by health workers to address the disease burden identified.

  • The standard workload per health worker per year is the amount of work within one health service task that one health worker could perform in a year if he/she dedicated all his/her working time to that task.

  • Expert opinion from the technical working group

  • A cross-sectional survey of health professionals [32].

Supply of nurses and midwives
  • The existing stock of health professionals, the rate of labour flow (attrition), and the education pipeline (number of admissions into health professions education institutions and pass rates).

  • Economic Surveys - 2000–2021 by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS)

  • Human Resources for Health Strategic Plan 2019–2023

  • National Health Workforce Accounts (NHWA) database

  • Datasets submitted by professional regulator bodies.

Budget and financing data
  • Gross domestic product

  • General Government Health Expenditure (GGHE)

  • HRH Expenditure as a percent of GGHE

  • Salaries and income levels of health workers

  • Budget Performance Review reports by Controller of Budget

  • National Health Accounts Report for 2021

Findings

Projected health workforce supply in Kenya, 2021–2036

Overall, the supply of the health occupations included in the analysis are projected to expand at an annual average of 3.4%. This rate of increase will likely boost the overall supply from the estimated 194,254 at baseline in 2021 to at least 226,434 by 2025, representing almost 17% improvement from 2021 to 2025. If the trends continue, the supply of health workers could reach 263,676 by 2030, which will be a further 12.6% increase compared to the projected supply for 2025. Additionally, about 15.4% increase from the projected 2030 supply is anticipated by 2035 should the supply dynamics remain fairly constant, bringing the overall supply in 2035 to about 304,351 across the public and private sectors.

The nursing and midwifery workforce is, however, projected to expand at a slower pace of 1.5% annually or 7–8% every 5 years if the observed dynamics in attrition (outflows) and inflows remains unchanged. This trajectory will likely lead to a net addition of some 28,000 by 2035. For example, in 2021, there were 109,659 Kenya Registered Community Health Nurses which is projected to increase to about 137,617 by 2035, representing a 25.5% net increase over the period.

Also, there were 18,198 medical laboratory technologists which is projected to increase to 19,697 by 2025 and to 23,023 by 2035. Thus, the medical laboratory technologists are anticipated to increase by 26.5% between 2021 and 2035 if no interventions are made to influence the training capacity and throughputs from the training institutions. Similarly, in 2021 there were 11,129 medical officers, which is projected to expand by just 7% to 11,893 by 2030. If the supply dynamics remain the same, the supply of medical officers is likely to increase by a further 11% to 12,340 in 2035.

Furthermore, the supply of pharmacists is anticipated to increase from 4,069 in 2021 to 5,304 by 2030 and 5,912 by 2035 assuming the training capacity and throughputs remains similar. The supply of pharmacy technologists, however, is increasing slowly by 0.8% (range: 0.7–1%) annually. There is thus, a seeming de-accelerating in the training outputs of pharmacy technologist leading to an expected 12.2% increase in their supply from 11,429 in 2021 to 12,825 by 2035. Table 2 provides details of the projected supply of 30 categories of health workers in Kenya if the current trend continues without interventions to either abate or accelerate production.

Table 2. Projected health workforce supply, 2021–2035.

bold>SN Health professionals Projected supply, 2021–2035
2021 (Baseline) 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
1. Medical officer 11,129 11,220 11,309 11,397 11,483 11,568 11,651 11,733 11,814 11,893 11,971 12,047 12,122 12,196 12,269
2. Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 402 454 504 554 603 652 699 746 792 837 881 924 967 1,009 1,051
3. Ophthalmologist 104 161 216 271 325 378 430 481 532 581 630 678 725 771 816
4. Paediatrician 343 396 447 498 548 598 646 693 740 786 831 876 919 962 1,004
5. Physician (Internal Medicine) 347 400 451 502 552 601 649 697 744 789 835 879 922 965 1,007
6. Psychiatrist 70 127 184 239 293 347 400 451 502 552 601 649 697 744 789
7. Surgeon 332 397 460 522 584 644 703 761 819 875 930 985 1,038 1,091 1,142
8. Pathologist 65 122 179 234 289 342 395 447 498 548 597 645 693 740 786
9. Operating Theatre nurse N/D 180 357 531 702 870 1,035 1,198 1,357 1,514 1,668 1,820 1,969 2,116 2,260
10. Kenya Registered Community Health Nurse 109,659 111,755 113,815 115,840 117,831 119,788 121,711 123,602 125,461 127,288 129,084 130,850 132,585 134,291 135,968
11. Mental Health/Psychiatry Nurse N/D 72 143 212 281 348 414 479 543 606 667 728 788 846 904
12. Critical care Nurse N/D 122 241 358 474 587 699 808 916 1,022 1,126 1,228 1,329 1,428 1,525
13. Paediatric Nurse N/D 60 119 177 234 290 345 399 452 505 556 607 656 705 753
14. Kenya Registered Midwife N/D 216 428 637 842 1,044 1,242 1,437 1,629 1,817 2,002 2,184 2,363 2,539 2,712
15. Registered Clinical Officer 21,797 24,216 26,595 28,933 31,231 33,490 35,711 37,893 40,039 42,149 44,222 46,260 48,264 50,233 52,169
16. Anaesthetist Clinical Officer 932 1,177 1,418 1,655 1,888 2,117 2,342 2,563 2,780 2,994 3,204 3,411 3,614 3,813 4,010
17. Lung & Skin Clinical Officer 272 357 441 524 605 685 763 840 916 990 1,063 1,135 1,206 1,275 1,344
18. Paediatric Clinical Officer 512 593 673 752 829 905 980 1,053 1,125 1,196 1,266 1,334 1,401 1,467 1,533
19. Reproductive Health Clinical Officer 132 197 261 324 386 447 507 566 624 681 737 792 846 899 951
20. Dental surgeon 1,344 1,346 1,349 1,351 1,353 1,355 1,358 1,360 1,362 1,364 1,366 1,368 1,370 1,372 1,374
21. Community Oral Health Officer N/D 41 80 119 158 196 233 269 305 341 375 409 443 476 508
22. Pharmacist 4,069 4,216 4,360 4,502 4,642 4,779 4,913 5,046 5,176 5,304 5,430 5,554 5,675 5,795 5,912
23. Pharmaceutical Technologist 11,429 11,540 11,650 11,757 11,863 11,966 12,069 12,169 12,267 12,364 12,460 12,553 12,646 12,736 12,825
24. Physiotherapist 1,757 2,114 2,465 2,810 3,149 3,483 3,810 4,132 4,449 4,760 5,066 5,367 5,663 5,953 6,239
25. Occupational Therapist 553 706 856 1,003 1,148 1,290 1,431 1,568 1,704 1,837 1,967 2,096 2,222 2,347 2,469
26. Orthopaedic Technologist 287 313 338 363 387 411 435 458 481 504 526 547 569 590 610
27. Clinical Dietician N/D 650 1,289 1,917 2,534 3,141 3,737 4,324 4,900 5,467 6,024 6,571 7,109 7,638 8,158
28. Nutritionist 10,521 10,770 11,014 11,254 11,490 11,723 11,951 12,175 12,396 12,613 12,826 13,035 13,241 13,443 13,642
29. Speech Therapist N/D 8 17 25 32 40 48 55 63 70 77 84 91 98 105
30. Medical Laboratory Technologist 18,198 18,582 18,960 19,332 19,697 20,056 20,408 20,755 21,096 21,431 21,761 22,085 22,403 22,716 23,023
Kenya 194,254 202,507 210,620 218,595 226,434 234,140 241,715 249,161 256,481 263,676 270,749 277,702 284,536 291,255 297,859
% net increase 4.2% 4.0% 3.8% 3.6% 3.4% 3.2% 3.1% 2.9% 2.8% 2.7% 2.6% 2.5% 2.4% 2.3%

N/D = There was no disaggregated baseline stock data, but annual intake and/or graduate data was available.

Projected needs-based requirements for health workers in Kenya to address the population’s need for health services

The needs-based projections took into account four main parameters: (a) the disease burden of the country, (b) the size composition of the population along the life course, (c) the package of essential health services required to address the disease burden along the life course of the population and the continuum of public health functions, and (d) the health worker productivity (standard workload). Based on these parameters, the needs-based requirements for health workers in Kenya were projected at 254,220 in 2021 and anticipated to increase at an annual average of 4.7%. If the dynamics of the disease burden and population’s demographics remain in the same trajectories, the needs-based requirements could reach 299,452 by 2025 and then 476,278 in 2035.

The projections for doctors, suggest that Kenya required at least 25,100 medical officers in 2021 based on the disease burden, population and service delivery model. However, the need for doctors is projected to triple to 71,643 by 2035. This corresponds to Kenya requiring at least 5 generalist doctors (medical officers) per 10,000 population or approximately one doctor for every 2,000 population to support the aspirations of universal health coverage.

In addition, across medical specialities such as obstetrics and gynaecology, ophthalmology, paediatrics, internal medicine, psychiatry, surgery, and pathology, the country required some 4,863 in 2021. The need for these specialists is further projected to increase by 11.2% by 2025 to 5,427 and to 6,551 by 2030, representing a 17% increase from the 2025 requirements. If the dynamics of the disease burden, composition of the population and the needed health interventions remain the same, the projected need for medical specialist could increase by 23.7% to 8,474 by 2035. These projections corresponds to a ratio of Kenya needing at least one medical specialist per 12,500 population or a density of 8 medical specialists per 100,000 people.

Also, the needs-based requirement for pharmacists and clinical pharmacists was projected to be 5,987 in 2021 across the public and private sectors, which is projected to increase by 16.4% by 2025 to reach 6,970. If the trajectory remains the same, it is projected that the needs-based requirement for pharmacists and clinical pharmacists will expand rapidly by 77% to 12,354 by 2035. The needs-based requirements for the nursing and midwifery workforce were projected to be 142,737 in 2021 and anticipated to increase by 34.3% to 191,639 in 2030. A further 19% increase in the needed nurses and midwives is projected from the 2030 requirement to 228,403 by 2035 across the various disciplines of nursing and midwifery. These projections notwithstanding, if Kenya intends to increase its supply of nurses and midwives to the international labour market, it would be imperative to produce more than the projected needs-based requirements to ensure that outmigration does not compromise the aspiration for universal health coverage. Table 3 provides details of the year-by-year projections of the needs-based requirement for health workers of various.

Table 3. Projected needs-based requirements for health workers, 2021–2035.

No. Health professionals Projected needs-based health workforce requirements
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
1 Medical officer 25,100 26,905 28,908 31,136 33,532 35,864 38,188 40,797 43,731 47,037 51,087 55,310 60,089 65,502 71,643
2 Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 535 547 559 571 583 596 609 623 636 650 665 679 694 709 725
3 Ophthalmologist 467 487 509 533 560 589 621 657 697 741 791 846 909 979 1,059
4 Paediatrician 569 549 532 517 504 472 463 456 450 445 426 424 422 422 422
5 Physician (Internal Medicine) 426 440 455 472 491 516 539 564 591 622 661 699 742 790 843
6 Psychiatrist 159 156 153 152 150 152 152 152 153 154 157 159 161 163 165
7 Surgeon 2,475 2,565 2,664 2,770 2,886 3,012 3,151 3,303 3,471 3,656 3,861 4,090 4,344 4,628 4,946
8 Pathologist 232 237 243 248 253 260 266 271 277 283 291 297 304 310 317
9 Operating Theatre nurse 3,560 3,639 3,719 3,801 3,884 3,969 4,057 4,146 4,237 4,330 4,426 4,523 4,622 4,724 4,828
10 Kenya Registered Community Health Nurse 136,321 141,503 147,035 152,948 158,995 163,722 168,386 173,336 178,605 184,230 191,005 197,493 204,483 212,039 220,233
11 Mental Health/Psychiatry Nurse 729 711 697 686 679 680 677 677 678 681 695 701 708 716 726
12 Critical care Nurse 720 736 752 769 786 803 821 839 857 876 896 915 936 956 977
13 Paediatric Nurse 981 979 978 979 982 975 981 989 997 1,007 1,010 1,022 1,035 1,049 1,064
14 Kenya Registered Midwife 424 433 443 452 462 472 483 493 504 515 527 538 550 562 575
15 Registered Clinical Officer 35,101 36,120 37,245 38,487 39,857 41,604 43,279 45,131 47,182 49,456 52,236 55,056 58,202 61,718 65,655
16 Anaesthetist Clinical Officer 2,992 3,058 3,126 3,195 3,265 3,337 3,411 3,487 3,564 3,643 3,724 3,806 3,891 3,977 4,066
17 Lung & Skin Clinical Officer 43 44 45 46 47 49 50 51 52 53 55 56 57 58 60
18 Paediatric Clinical Officer 457 457 457 458 459 454 456 459 463 466 465 469 474 480 485
19 Reproductive Health Clinical Officer 72 74 75 77 79 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98
20 Dental surgeon 4,145 4,237 4,330 4,425 4,522 4,687 4,790 4,896 5,004 5,114 5,310 5,427 5,546 5,668 5,793
21 Community Oral Health Officer 1,445 1,477 1,509 1,543 1,577 1,600 1,635 1,671 1,708 1,746 1,799 1,839 1,879 1,920 1,963
22 Pharmacist 5,094 5,273 5,468 5,682 5,919 6,211 6,502 6,824 7,183 7,584 8,063 8,566 9,130 9,764 10,478
23 Clinical pharmacist 893 927 965 1,006 1,051 1,103 1,157 1,217 1,283 1,356 1,441 1,532 1,634 1,748 1,876
24 Pharmaceutical Technologist 4,685 4,992 5,336 5,723 6,159 6,702 7,260 7,892 8,608 9,421 10,397 11,448 12,643 14,005 15,557
25 Physiotherapist 3,742 3,877 4,024 4,183 4,355 4,400 4,603 4,826 5,072 5,343 5,513 5,844 6,214 6,628 7,092
26 Occupational Therapist 3,543 3,621 3,700 3,782 3,865 3,763 3,846 3,930 4,017 4,105 4,012 4,100 4,190 4,283 4,377
27 Orthopaedic Technologist 81 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 105 107 109
28 Clinical Dietician 1,244 1,238 1,233 1,229 1,225 1,214 1,211 1,209 1,207 1,205 1,199 1,198 1,198 1,197 1,197
29 Nutritionist 5,471 5,626 5,805 6,008 6,240 6,455 6,756 7,096 7,480 7,916 8,374 8,934 9,568 10,287 11,103
30 Speech Therapist 242 248 253 259 264 270 276 282 288 295 301 308 315 322 329
31 Medical Laboratory Technologist 11,909 12,622 13,422 14,323 15,338 16,553 17,849 19,316 20,978 22,863 25,077 27,512 30,282 33,435 37,028
32 Orthopaedic Trauma Technologist 361 369 377 386 394 403 412 421 430 439 449 459 469 479 490
Kenya 254,220 264,230 275,103 286,932 299,452 311,060 323,060 336,187 350,584 366,419 385,101 404,445 425,890 449,724 476,278
Net increase per year 10,009 10,873 11,828 12,521 11,607 12,001 13,126 14,397 15,835 18,682 19,344 21,445 23,834 26,554
% net increase 3.9% 4.1% 4.3% 4.4% 3.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.3% 4.5% 5.1% 5.0% 5.3% 5.6% 5.9%
Aggregate % change from the baseline 3.9% 8.2% 12.9% 17.8% 22.4% 27.1% 32.2% 37.9% 44.1% 51.5% 59.1% 67.5% 76.9% 87.3%

Needs versus supply gap analysis

In 2021, the available health workforce in Kenya covered about 76.4% of the needs-based requirements, leaving a gap of 23.6% if the disease burden is to be tackled with appropriate interventions from health promotion, disease prevention, detection, treatment, rehabilitation and palliation. The estimated gap translated into a needs-based shortage of 59,966 health workers in 2021. Without appropriate mechanisms to increase the throughput from the education pipeline, increase absorption and retention of the trained health workers, the projections show that the projected supply to the need (the Need Availability Ratio, NAR) could decrease marginally to 75.3% by 2026 and a further decrease to 60.2% by 2035. NAR is a metric of relative gap analysis that compares the supply of the health workforce to the needs-based requirement, indicating the extent to which available health workers meet the healthcare needs of a population.

In terms of headcount, Kenya’s needs-based shortage of health workers is projected to increase from the estimated 59,966 in 2021 to 114,352 by 2030 and up to 201,581 by 2035 if effective interventions are not implemented to optimise capacity to increase training outputs, strengthen absorption and retention. The projected increase in the needs-based shortage of health workers is partly attributed to the overall health workforce supply increasing at an annual rate of 3.4% compared to an annual increase of 4.7% in the needs-based health workforce requirements, leaving an annual gap of 1.3% between supply and needs.

Underlying the overall projection are significant variations as 31% of the health occupations analysed (n = 10) had the projected supply falling short of meeting even 50% of the needs-based requirement by 2026. In the longer term, the projected supply of about 28% of the health occupations analysed (n = 9) are unlikely to be able to cover half of the needs-based requirements by 2031 unless there are corrective intervention(s) to improve the throughput from the education pipeline. For example, in 2021, there were only 332 surgeons across various surgical sub-specialties which corresponded to just 13.4% of the required 2,475. Even though the projection shows a slightly optimistic trajectory, the anticipated supply of surgeons could cover only 21.4% of the projected needs-based requirements in 2026 and 24.1% in 2030. Under this trajectory, it is expected that the shortage of surgeons will be around 2,931 in 2030. The projections show similar patterns for majority of medical specialists and other specialised health professionals.

On the other hand, 22% of the health occupations analysed (n = 7) seem to have their baseline supply levels in 2021 commensurate with or even surpassing their respective needs-based requirements. For example, the 2021 supply of specialist obstetricians and gynaecologists matched about 75% of Kenya’s needs-based requirement and if the trajectory of training continues and the graduates are retained in the health system, the needs-based shortfall could be offset by 2026. It is, however, important to put in context that a seeming role substitution by reproductive health clinical officers have contributed to mitigate the magnitude of needs-based shortage of specialist obstetricians and gynaecologists.

In 2021, the supply of Kenya Registered Community Health Nurses corresponded to about 80% of the population health needs-based requirements. Nonetheless, the need for nurses is projected to be growing at a rate of about 3.5% percent each year (varying from 3.8–4%) which surpasses the projected 1.5% annual net annual growth in the supply of nurses (varying from 1.2% to 1.9%). This trajectory could lead to an increasing shortage of nurses from 26,662 in 2021 to 61,921 by 2031 if the prevailing capacity of 5,500 is not increased in line with the projected needs-based requirements. The projection further suggest that in 2031 Kenya might have only about 68% of the needs-based requirement for the nursing workforce as the needs continue to outpace the supply.

At baseline in 2021, an estimated 80% of the needs-based requirements for pharmacists was met by the existing supply (5,094 needed vs 4,069 stock) as a result of expansions in the enrolment and throughputs from the pharmacy programmes in various universities. However, as the need increases, the projected supply of pharmacists might match about 77% of the needs-based requirement in 2026 (6,211 vs 4779) and only 67% in 2031 in which the country would potentially face shortfall of 2,634 pharmacists excluding those that specialist pharmacists. Table 4 compares the need versus supply of various health occupations in absolute (shortages or surplus) and relative terms.

Table 4. Projected needs-based requirements versus projected supply gap analysis for health workers.

No. Health professionals 2021 2026 2031
Need (a) Supply (b) Gap (b-a) NAR (b/a) Need (a) Supply (b) Gap (b-a) NAR (b/a) Need (a) Supply (b) Gap (b-a) NAR (b/a)
1 Medical officer 25,100 11,129 (13,971) 44.3% 35,864 11,568 (24,296) 32.3% 51,087 11,971 (39,117) 23.4%
2 Obstetrician & Gynecologist 535 402 (133) 75.2% 596 652 56 109.3% 665 881 216 132.6%
3 Ophthalmologist 467 104 (363) 22.2% 589 378 (211) 64.2% 791 630 (161) 79.7%
4 Paediatrician 569 343 (226) 60.3% 472 598 125 126.5% 426 831 405 195.2%
5 Physician (Internal Medicine) 426 347 (79) 81.5% 516 601 85 116.4% 661 835 173 126.2%
6 Psychiatrist 159 70 (89) 44.1% 152 347 195 228.2% 157 601 444 382.1%
7 Surgeon 2,475 332 (2,143) 13.4% 3,012 644 (2,368) 21.4% 3,861 930 (2,931) 24.1%
8 Pathologist 232 65 (167) 28.0% 260 342 83 131.8% 291 597 306 205.4%
9 Operating Theatre nurse 3,560 (3,560) 0.0% 3,969 870 (3,099) 21.9% 4,426 1,668 (2,757) 37.7%
10 Kenya Registered Community Health Nurse 136,321 109,659 (26,662) 80.4% 163,722 119,788 (43,935) 73.2% 191,005 129,084 (61,921) 67.6%
11 Mental Health/Psychiatry Nurse 729 (729) 0.0% 680 348 (332) 51.1% 695 667 (28) 96.0%
12 Critical care Nurse 720 (720) 0.0% 803 587 (216) 73.1% 896 1,126 231 125.7%
13 Paediatric Nurse 981 (981) 0.0% 975 290 (685) 29.7% 1,010 556 (454) 55.1%
14 Kenya Registered Midwife 424 (424) 0.0% 472 1,044 572 221.0% 527 2,002 1,475 380.1%
15 Registered Clinical Officer 35,101 21,797 (13,304) 62.1% 41,604 33,490 (8,114) 80.5% 52,236 44,222 (8,014) 84.7%
16 Anaesthetist Clinical Officer 2,992 932 (2,060) 31.1% 3,337 2,117 (1,221) 63.4% 3,724 3,204 (519) 86.1%
17 Lung & Skin Clinical Officer 43 272 229 626.1% 49 685 636 1405.3% 55 1,063 1,009 1947.1%
18 Paediatric Clinical Officer 457 512 55 112.1% 454 905 451 199.5% 465 1,266 801 272.4%
19 Reproductive Health Clinical Officer 72 132 60 183.3% 80 447 367 557.0% 90 737 647 822.5%
20 Dental surgeon 4,145 1,344 (2,801) 32.4% 4,687 1,355 (3,332) 28.9% 5,310 1,366 (3,944) 25.7%
21 Community Oral Health Officer 1,445 (1,445) 0.0% 1,600 196 (1,404) 12.2% 1,799 375 (1,424) 20.9%
22 Pharmacist 5,094 4,069 (1,025) 79.9% 6,211 4,779 (1,432) 76.9% 8,063 5,430 (2,634) 67.3%
23 Clinical pharmacist 893 (893) 0.0% 1,103 (1,103) 0.0% 1,441 (1,441) 0.0%
24 Pharmaceutical Technologist 4,685 11,429 6,744 243.9% 6,702 11,966 5,264 178.6% 10,397 12,460 2,063 119.8%
25 Physiotherapist 3,742 1,757 (1,985) 47.0% 4,400 3,483 (918) 79.1% 5,513 5,066 (446) 91.9%
26 Occupational Therapist 3,543 553 (2,990) 15.6% 3,763 1,290 (2,473) 34.3% 4,012 1,967 (2,044) 49.0%
27 Orthopaedic Technologist 81 287 206 356.2% 90 411 322 458.0% 100 526 425 524.8%
28 Clinical Dietician 1,244 (1,244) 0.0% 1,214 3,141 1,927 258.7% 1,199 6,024 4,825 502.5%
29 Nutritionist 5,471 10,521 5,050 192.3% 6,455 11,723 5,267 181.6% 8,374 12,826 4,451 153.2%
30 Speech Therapist 242 (242) 0.0% 270 40 (230) 14.9% 301 77 (224) 25.6%
31 Medical Laboratory Technologist 11,909 18,198 6,289 152.8% 16,553 20,056 3,503 121.2% 25,077 21,761 (3,317) 86.8%
32 Orthopedic Trauma Technologist 361 (361) 0.0% 403 (403) 0.0% 449 (449) 0.0%
Kenya 254,220 194,254 (59,966) 76.4% 311,060 234,140 (76,920) 75.3% 385,101 270,749 (114,352) 70.3%

NAR = Need Availability Ratio – a ratio of supply to need, which measures the degree to which the supply of HWF covers the need.

Health workforce financing and economic feasibility analysis of the labour market

In 2021, the public sector of national and county governments potentially allocated US$1.4 billion for health workforce employment (overall wage bill). This budget space is anticipated to expand marginally to US$1.7 billion by 2025. Without additional prioritization of health spending and workforce, economic improvements alone are expected to increase the public sector budget to $2.2 billion by 2030. In addition, the private sector, a key driver of health employment in Kenya, contributed approximately US$877 million in 2021. This amount could grow to $1.06 billion by 2025 and $1.37 billion by 2030 if the country’s economic growth potential is achieved.

Cumulatively, in 2021, the combined financial capacity for the health workforce from both public and private sectors was estimated at $2.29 billion. The financial capacities anticipated to increase by 21% to US$2.77 billion in 2025. If the macroeconomic outlook remains favourable, the financial space could increase by 29.2%, reaching $3.58 billion by 2030.(not worse than 2021). The policy conditions prioritises health in public spending within which the health workforce receives at least the same proportional share of the current health expenditure as before.

In 2021, the wage bill for employing all stock of health workers (at government salary levels) was approximately $2.85 billion on the supply side. Given an unmitigated supply pipeline based on the prevailing trends, the cost of absorbing all those employed from the training pipeline and retaining existing health workers is expected to reach US$3.34 billion in 2025 and up to US$3.9 billion by 2030. To employ all trained health workers in both public and private sectors, a 24.6% increase in financial capacity is needed, or an amount equivalent to 55% of the public sector wage bill. If not addressed, this financial shortfall for health workforce employment may lead to unemployment among skilled health workers, estimated to be 14% in 2021. The 2021 wage bill was approximately 2.62% of GDP (across public and private sectors), but it would have been 3.26% of GDP in 2021 if all unemployed health workers were to be absorbed. Thus, an additional 0.71% of GDP investment is needed to absorb the unemployed health workforce and those in the health professions education pipeline.

Assuming that training would be expanded for the supply of health workers (of various cadres) to meet all the projected needs, the needs-based requirements would have cost some US$4.17 billion in 2021 regarding employment and maintenance of the existing wage bill. Filling the needs-based requirements for health workers represents an average of 4.69% of GDP (range: 4.58–4.83%) between 2021 and 2030 regarding new employment and maintenance of the wage bill across the public and private sectors. Additionally, the cost of training to fill the needs-based gaps (which is shared between the Government and individuals) is about US$761.13 million (ranging from US$510.6 million to US$1.02 billion) or 0.4% of GDP (range: 0.03% to 0.64%). Thus, the health workforce requires an additional investment equivalent to 2.3% of GDP. Table 5 provides summary cost estimates and comparisons, which are graphically illustrated in Fig 2.

Table 5. Estimates of economic feasibility of supply and needs compared with potential financial space.

Cost implications and financial sustainability estimates 2021 2025 2030 Average Minimum Maximum
Public Sector Budget Space for HWF (a) 1 413.43 1 709.82 2 208.31 2 104.44 1 413.43 3 001.88
Estimated Private Sector Contribution (b) 877.01 1 060.92 1 370.23 1 305.78 877.01 1 862.63
Cumulative Financial Space (c = a + b) 2 290.44 2 770.74 3 578.54 3 410.22 2 290.44 4 864.50
Cost of employing projected supply (d) 2 853.00 3 339.53 3 902.61 3 718.55 2 853.00 4 517.57
Cost of employing to fill population health needs-based requirements (f) 4 173.57 4 991.89 6 255.87 6 101.19 4 173.57 8 975.88
Cost of training to fill population health needs-based gaps (g) 510.60 644.21 811.23 761.13 510.60 1 011.66
Overall investment required based on population health needs (Needs-based Employment + Cost of Training)(f + g) 4 684.17 5 636.11 7 067.10 6 862.32 4 684.17 9 987.54
Proportion of supply-side wage bill that could be absorbed by the estimated financial space (d/c) 80.28% 82.97% 91.70% 90.5% 80.3% 107.7%
The proportion of population health needs that could be covered by financial space (f/c) 54.88% 55.50% 57.20% 55.9% 54.2% 57.2%
Percent of financial space required to absorb “unemployed” health workers 24.56% 20.53% 9.06% 15.13% 1.10% 24.56%
Percent of public health sector wage required to absorb “unemployed” health workers 39.80% 33.27% 14.67% 24.51% 1.78% 39.80%
Current HWF expenditure as % of GDP 2.62% 2.62% 2.62% 2.62% 2.62% 2.62%
Cost of supply as % of GDP 3.26% 3.16% 2.86% 2.92% 2.43% 3.26%
Cost of population health needs as % of GDP 4.77% 4.72% 4.58% 4.69% 4.58% 4.83%
Additional cost of needs as % of GDP 2.15% 2.10% 1.96% 2.07% 1.96% 2.21%
Additional cost of supply as % of GDP 0.64% 0.54% 0.24% 0.40% 0.03% 0.64%

Fig 2. Financial feasibility analysis under different projection scenarios.

Fig 2

Discussion

This study is the first to apply a needs-based epidemiological approach to health workforce modelling at the national scale covering many health occupations in Kenya. Previous needs-based modelling in Kenya focused on hypertension in rural areas [33]. There are some multicounty estimates, including Kenya, but using different methodologies [2,9,34]. The direction of the findings of this study is consistent with those of previous studies showing needs-based health workforce shortfalls in Kenya. However, our estimation is lower than the World Bank’s estimate, which used a global dataset instead of Kenya-specific epidemiological data [34]. Using similar needs-based models but fitted using regional averages [2] also yielded estimates higher than the present study. Thus, the estimates using global averages produce results that are higher than those using regional averages, which are also higher than those using country-specific data.

Comparing the needs-based requirements and the anticipated supply of health workers suggested an absolute shortage of almost 60,000 in 2021, increasing to 114,352 by 2030 and up to 201,581 by 2035 if nothing is done to boost the system capacity for increased training, absorption and retention. This potential widening in the needs-based shortage of health workers is attributable to a faster rate of expansion in the need for health services due to increasing population and the evolving triple burden of disease on the one hand, and the other hand, a seeming decreasing rate of growth in the supply of health workers. To illustrate this gap, while the aggregate health workforce stock is increasing at a rate of 3.4% (2.7%–4.2%) annually, that of the population’s health needs is expanding at 4.7% (3.9%–6.2%) annually.

It is also important to note that the estimated supply of health workforce was based on the observed attrition trend in Kenya. However, with the Government’s bilateral agreement to export some 30,000 nurses to the UK and at least 4% attrition of skilled health workers [35], these developments could adversely impact the future supply of health workers. Thus, the imbalances estimated in this paper could be worse if the attrition levels assume a scenario worse than what is modelled. Nevertheless, anticipated expansion in training health workers beyond the current capacity could offset the impact of increased attrition.

The quality of health professions education remains a focal issue among key stakeholders, which can impact the health labour market dynamics. For instance, in Kenya and Uganda, over 33% of surveyed stakeholders articulated reservations concerning the competency levels of recently graduated nurses, opining that they are inadequately equipped to render high-quality patient care [36]. Such data accentuates the imperativeness of integrating a competency-based framework within educational and training curricula, which can improve productivity and boost the supply of health workers [23,37]. To address these concerns and enhance alignment between education and the needs of the health system, Kenya held a conference in 2021 focused on improving and harmonizing health professions education curricula. The conference resulted in actionable recommendations, including strengthening regulation and accreditation mechanisms, reducing reliance on short-term training programs, and implementing competency-based curricula.

On the levels of investment required in the health workforce, the study highlighted that addressing the labour market mismatches comes with an imperative need for the Kenyan Government, in collaboration with the private sector, to stimulate additional investment in health workforce development and employment by at least 6.5% increase per annum from both the public and private sectors. The private sector’s contribution to health workforce employment remains low even when the sector is growing. This increased investment is critical as Kenya is currently grappling with a paradox of unemployment of 14% of the existing health workforce [14] amidst a conspicuous deficit in health workers in the frontline of service delivery. A demographic surge in Kenya is escalating the demand for health services, necessitating an expansion in the health workforce. While the study anticipates that the private sector will absorb a proportionate share of the newly trained healthcare workers, the role of the public sector remains pivotal.

The study found that as of 2021, the existing health workers cover about 76.4% of the Kenyan population’s health needs (considering country-specific disease burden, demographic profile, essential health services and professional standards for service delivery), but the HWF unemployment rate of at least 14%. If the production of health workers and budgetary prioritisation of HWF remains constant over time, the budget space analysis suggests that there could be an annual financing gap of 15.13% that could result in unemployment. However, Kenya is not an isolated case. For example, comparable data from ten African countries derived through HLMAs suggest that almost 27% of the trained health workers might be unemployed or underemployed [3].

The paradox of having high unemployment among health workers despite a needs-based shortage, is a product of a misalignment between workforce supply and ability and willingness to employ (demand) [38,39]. This paradox often arises from low financial space due to restrictive public financial management rules that puts ceilings on public sector employment while stakeholders are expanding the training with the view to meeting planning targets that are delinked from the budget ceilings [8,40,41]. This underscores need for a paradigm shift from a one-size-fits-all notion that training more is also “the main solution” to needs-based shortage of health workers. Expanding budget space allocation by the ministry of finance and/or the approved establishment by the custodians of public employment are equally critical.

Undoubtedly, Kenya needs to urgently develop a master training plan to optimise and align the training pipeline with the needs of the population (as projected). This may require scaling up training in specific occupations while maintaining the current training capacity for others. However, there is greater attention on achieving a wage bill ceiling target of 35% and decision-makers are exploring ways of cutting down the public wage bill (the numerator) [17]. With the enormous return on investment of US$9 for every US$1 spent [42], it could be progressive to explore expanding the health budget (the denominator) through innovative financing mechanisms and efficiency gains from the almost 1 in 4 dollars of the health spending lost to technical inefficiency in the health system [43]. In addition, Kenya could explore using the principles of the Africa health workforce investment charter [44] to align and stimulate health workforce investments with the view of expanding employment by the devolved county governments and the private sector through a mutually agreed investment compact – as these entities make independent decisions on the employment of health workers. In addition, a national staffing norm/standard could be strategically used to provide both financial and regulatory incentives to drive job creation. For example, financial incentive could be provided through enhanced reimbursement rates by the health insurance scheme for service performed by those with adequate staffing. Regulatory enforcement for health facilities to meet the set staffing standards, particularly for the private sector could also drive job creation [45].

Furthermore, at the heart of addressing the broader health workforce challenges is the management of the health workforce that can contribute to improving efficiency [46] and health sector industrial harmony [47,48]. There is the need to attract and retain health workers, particularly in rural and underserved areas where health services are often less than optimal. To achieve this, the MOH needs to collaboratively work with the county governments and other ministries to develop competitive incentives, supportive work environments, and professional development opportunities that can attract and motivate health workers. Such benefits have been shown to improve retention rates and encourage health workers to remain and serve where they are needed most, fostering a stable and committed workforce [49].

Finally, Kenya can leverage partnerships with international health organizations, private sectors, and academic institutions to secure funding, resources, and technical support. These collaborations can bridge financial gaps and provide vital expertise in healthcare training and workforce distribution, accelerating Kenya’s progress toward an equitable health system.

Limitations

One observation worth noting is the need for a clearly distinguished scope of practice across clinical officers, doctors, and, to some extent, nurses/midwives. This made it difficult to accurately determine activities or interventions exclusively carried out by doctors and/or clinical officers at the primary and secondary levels of care. There will likely be some overlap between the estimated needs-based requirement for doctors and clinical officers. With this caveat, based on the prevailing health service delivery model, the need for clinical officers (of all generalist and specialised ones) appears to be on the ascendency, increasing by 13% from 38,665 in 2021 to 43,707 by 2025 and a further 23% increase to 53,706 by 2030. If the factors affecting the need for clinical officers remain the same, their need could be more than 70,000 by 2035, an increase of 31% from the number needed in 2030. This could be ameliorated if task-shifting and/or accelerating the training of doctors is pursued.

Even though the tool used for the analysis is able to run sensitivity analysis (in the form of best and worst case scenarios) [4], it relies on reported confidence intervals of the prevalence rates of diseases. However, available data at the time of analysis were point estimates without information on the boundaries of uncertainty. As a result, it was not feasible to conduct sensitivity analysis which should be considered a limitation of this paper. Strengthening routine health information system would be critical for enhancing the precision and ability to run robust sensitivity analysis in subsequent updates.

The input data for this modelling study was triangulated from various sources as highlighted in the methodology section. As a result, the underlying limitations and assumptions of these data sources are indirectly inherited by this study. Some of these limitations may include, but not limited to variations in the data collection methods, rigor, frequency of updates, and levels of accuracy, which may lead to inconsistencies.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Health workforce needs-based analysis tool.

(XLSM)

pgph.0003966.s001.xlsm (32.2MB, xlsm)

Acknowledgments

The Ministry of Health (MOH) Health Labour Market Analysis (HLMA) Technical Working Group (TWG) contributed to data collection.

Data Availability

All relevant data are publicly available within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The full health labour market analysis report is publicly available from the Republic of Kenya labour market observatory (https://labourmarket.go.ke/media/resources/Final_Kenya_HLMA_Report_2023_v8.pdf).

Funding Statement

Data collection for this study was funded by the World Health Organization through ILO-OECD-WHO Working for Health (W4H) grant number 76677 and grant number 71753 from the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development (DFATD), Canada. JAA, SCO, BK and JNO were supported by both grants. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Okoroafor SC, Ahmat A, Asamani JA, Millogo JJS, Nyoni J. An overview of health workforce education and accreditation in Africa: implications for scaling-up capacity and quality. Hum Resour Health. 2022;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00735-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO/AFRO. The nursing and midwifery workforce in the African Region: optimizing and accelerating investments for resilient health systems: a regional technical report. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa; 2022. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/366121 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO/AFRO. A decade review of the health workforce in the WHO African Region, 2013-2022: implications for aligning investments to accelerate progress towards universal health coverage. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa; 2024. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/376643 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Asamani JA, Bediakon KSB, Boniol M, Munga’tu JK, Akugri FA, Muvango LL, et al. Projected health workforce requirements and shortage for addressing the disease burden in the WHO Africa Region, 2022-2030: a needs-based modelling study. BMJ Glob Health. 2024;7(Suppl 1):e015972. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO/AFRO. Needs-based health workforce requirements to address Africa’s disease burden and demographic evolution: implications for investing in the education and employment of health workers, 2022–2030. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa; 2024. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/376718 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cometto G, Boniol M, Mahat A, Diallo K, Campbell J. Understanding the WHO health workforce support and safeguards list 2023. Bull World Health Organ. 2023;101(6):362–A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization. WHO health workforce support and safeguards list 2023. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240069787 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Asamani JA, Kigozi J, Sikapande B, Christmals CD, Okoroafor SC, Ismaila H, et al. Investing in the health workforce: fiscal space analysis of 20 countries in East and Southern Africa, 2021-2026. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(Suppl 1):e008416. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boniol M, Kunjumen T, Nair TS, Siyam A, Campbell J, Diallo K. The global health workforce stock and distribution in 2020 and 2030: a threat to equity and “universal” health coverage? BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(6):e009316. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ahmat A, Okoroafor SC, Kazanga I, Asamani JA, Millogo JJS, Illou MMA, et al. The health workforce status in the WHO African Region: findings of a cross-sectional study. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(Suppl 1):e008317. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mbogo BM, Odhiambo CO, Mokua BFK, Muendo WW, Ng’ang’a MW. Health service provision and Universal Health Coverage program at the Outpatient Department of Karatina Hospital, Nyeri County, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2020;97. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=0012835X&AN=150098099&h=grQFCutCc8%2BwubJcaZMQr1y8SeLgS1GpiCBVIZgFx45VyiYdef3Y%2FKOx%2F9QwuRNCdlmQxODFj5l78KiIYKEsEg%3D%3D&crl=c [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mogeni EG, Masese GN, Mbithe PM. An assessment of health system in Kenya: towards the achievement of universal health coverage. Machakos Univ. 2019;6:1–18. Available from: http://ir.mksu.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456780/4474/Evans%20Mogeni.pdf?sequence=1 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Muinde JVS, Prince RJ. A new universalism? Universal health coverage and debates about rights, solidarity and inequality in Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 2023;319:115258. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Okoroafor SC, Kwesiga B, Ogato J, Gura Z, Gondi J, Jumba N, et al. Investing in the health workforce in Kenya: trends in size, composition and distribution from a descriptive health labour market analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(Suppl 1):e009748. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Salaries and Remuneration Commission. Insight into the remuneration of health workers in the public service. Nairobi: Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC); 2023. Available from: https://src.go.ke/2023/09/25/insight-into-the-remuneration-of-health-workers-in-the-public-service/. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Government of Kenya. Conference report – The 3rd National Wagebill Conference 15th – 17th April 2024. Nairobi: Salaries and Remuneration Commission of Kenya; 2024. Available from: https://nwbc.src.go.ke/conference-report/. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oinga S. Getting to 35% to unlock more funds for development and service delivery – By Stephen Oinga – The 3rd National Wagebill Conference 15th – 17th April 2024. Nairobi: Salaries and Remuneration Commission; 2024. Available from: https://nwbc.src.go.ke/2024/07/09/getting-to-35-to-unlock-more-funds-for-development-and-service-delivery-by-stephen-oinga/. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Asamani JA, Christmals CD, Reitsma GM. The needs-based health workforce planning method: a systematic scoping review of analytical applications. Health Policy Plan. 2021. [cited 2021 Feb 28];36(8):1325–43. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Asamani JA, Christmals CD, Reitsma GM. Modelling the supply and need for health professionals for primary health care in Ghana: implications for health professions education and employment planning. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9):e0257957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ahern S, Woods N, Kalmus O, Birch S, Listl S. Needs-based planning for the oral health workforce: development and application of a simulation model. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0394-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Asamani JA, Christmals CD, Reitsma GM. Advancing the population needs-based health workforce planning methodology: a simulation tool for country application. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Asamani JA, Zurn P, Pitso P, Mothebe M, Moalosi N, Malieane T, et al. Health workforce supply, needs and financial feasibility in Lesotho: a labour market analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(Suppl 1):e008420. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Birch S, Gibson J, McBride A; Munros Team. Opportunities for, and implications of, skill mix changes in health care pathways: pay, productivity and practice variations in a needs-based planning framework. Soc Sci Med. 2020;250:112863. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kavya S, Sanjay PZ, Abhay G, Syed ZQ. Methodological issues in estimating and forecasting health manpower requirement. J Public Adm Policy Res. 2014;6(2):25–33. doi: 10.5897/jpapr2011.067 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.WHO. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030. World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250368 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Birch S, Kephart G, Murphy GT, O’Brien-Pallas L, Alder R, MacKenzie A. Health human resources planning and the production of health: development of an extended analytical framework for needs-based health human resources planning. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009;15(6 Suppl):S56–61. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181b1ec0e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tomblin Murphy G, Kephart G, Lethbridge L, O’Brien-Pallas L, Birch S. Planning for what? Challenging the assumptions of health human resources planning. Health Policy. 2009;92(2–3):225–33. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.WHO. Workload indicators of staffing need: user manual. 2010 [cited 2015 Oct 11]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44414
  • 29.Toure H, Aranguren Garcia M, Bustamante Izquierdo JP, Coulibaly S, Nganda B, Zurn P. Health expenditure: how much is spent on health and care worker remuneration? An analysis of 33 low- and middle-income African countries. Hum Resour Health. 2023;21:96. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00872-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Scheffler RM, Herbst CH, Lemiere C, Campbell J. Health labor market analyses in low- and middle-income countries: an evidence-based approach. Washington (DC): World Bank Publications; 2016. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0931-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.IHME I of HM and E. Global burden of disease study. In: GHDX [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 14]. Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2019
  • 32.Asamani JA, Christmals CD, Reitsma GM. Health service activity standards and standard workloads for primary healthcare in Ghana: a cross-sectional survey of health professionals. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(3):332. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vedanthan R, Lee DJ, Kamano JH, Herasme OI, Kiptoo P, Tulienge D, et al. Hypertension management in rural western Kenya: a needs-based health workforce estimation model. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0389-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.World Bank. Education and labor markets for nurses in Central, East and Southern Africa: challenges and opportunities. 2020 Jul. Available from: https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/WBG_ECSA%5B12%5D.pdf
  • 35.Chankova S, Muchiri S, Kombe G. Health workforce attrition in the public sector in Kenya: a look at the reasons. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:58. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.McGivern G, Seruwagi G, Wafula F, Kiefer T, Nakidde C, Museiga A, et al. Strengthening health professional regulation in Kenya and Uganda: research findings policy brief. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hongoro C, McPake B. How to bridge the gap in human resources for health. Lancet. 2004;364(9443):1451–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17229-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.World Health Organization. Health labour market analysis guidebook. World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/348069
  • 39.Hutchinson E, Kiwanuka S, Muhindo R, Nimwesiga C, Balabanova D, McKee M, et al. The paradoxical surplus of health workers in Africa: the need for research and policy engagement. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2024;39(3):956–62. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lauer J, Soucat A, Araújo E, Bertram M, Edejer T, Brindley C, et al. Paying for needed health workers for the SDGs: an analysis of fiscal and financial space. In: Buchan J, Dhillon IS, Campbell J, editors. Health employment and economic growth: an evidence base. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. p. 236. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barroy H, Gupta S. From overall fiscal space to budgetary space for health: connecting public financial management to resource mobilization in the era of COVID-19. Washington (DC): Center for Global Development; 2020. Oct. Report No.: CGD Policy Paper 185. Available from: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/overall-fiscal-space-budgetary-space-health-connecting-public-financial-management [Google Scholar]
  • 42.WHO. Working for health and growth: investing in the health workforce. 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241511308
  • 43.WHO/AFRO. Technical efficiency of health systems in the WHO African Region. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa; 2021. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/371012 [Google Scholar]
  • 44.WHO/AFRO. Africa Health Workforce Investment Charter: enabling sustainable health workforce investments for universal health coverage and health security for the Africa we want. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa; 2024. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/376689 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Asamani JA, Amertil NP, Ismaila H, Francis AA, Chebere MM, Nabyonga-Orem J. Nurses and midwives demographic shift in Ghana-the policy implications of a looming crisis. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0377-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nyawira L, Tsofa B, Musiega A, Munywoki J, Njuguna RG, Hanson K, et al. Management of human resources for health: implications for health systems efficiency in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1046. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08432-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Waithaka D, Kagwanja N, Nzinga J, Tsofa B, Leli H, Mataza C, et al. Prolonged health worker strikes in Kenya- perspectives and experiences of frontline health managers and local communities in Kilifi County. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1131-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Manguele ALJ, Sidat M, Ferrinho P, Cabral AJR, Craveiro I. Strikes of physicians and other health care workers in sub-Saharan African countries: a systematic review. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1209201. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1209201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Okoroafor S, Nwachukwu C, Asamani J, Ahmat A, Osubor M. Understanding the factors influencing health workers’ choice of workplace locations: a qualitative description of primary healthcare workers’ perspectives in Nigeria. J Glob Health Rep. 2023;7:e2023044. doi: 10.29392/001c.82032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003966.r001

Decision Letter 0

Ikechi G Okpechi

25 Oct 2024

PGPH-D-24-02288

Modelling the health labour market outlook in Kenya: supply, needs and investment requirements for health workers, 2021 - 2035

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Asamani,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Kindly discuss and elaborate on some of your findings as suggested by the reviewers. For instance, discussion should provide more insight and recommendation that would build on the information found in the models and why Kenya actively plans to export nurses when there are needs at home. Such detail will provide important clarity to this work and improve its quality.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 09 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ikechi G Okpechi

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The manuscript has been evaluated by three reviewers, and their comments are available below.

The reviewers have requested a couple of major revisions. Could you please carefully revise the manuscript to address all comments raised?

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria ? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I don't know

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This was a comprehensive modelling study about Kenya’s healthcare workforce. This is an extremely important study for Kenya’s national healthcare planning. They used a published simulation tool and convened a technical expert panel to generate the necessary inputs. The equations underlying the models are well described.

I have just a few comments:

1) It would be helpful to know if the excel file used is a widely used model for HLMA and whether other models were considered.

2) The supplementary excel file is very comprehensive, but it is a bit unclear where the inputs came from for every sheet. The addition of some footnotes would be helpful. In Table 1, are the data sources cites such at the reader can visit each of the respective websites/reports?

3) “Despite progress, the WHO Africa Region needs more than 6.1 million alongside the maldistribution of available health workers, one of the most significant obstacles to achieving UHC by 2030” – consider rewording sentence to improve readability

4) WHO Africa Region vs. WHO African Region – be consistent about Africa vs. African

5) Introduction “absorption capacity” – define this in the introduction when it first used, as it may be unfamiliar to many readers

6) Results, “range from 4.2% in 2021 to 2.7% by 2030” – Explain in the methods where this range comes from. Is this using a range of model inputs (like a sensitivity analysis using 80% to 125% the input values), or inputs from multiple sources? Is this by varying one input at a time, or all inputs simultaneously? Etc.

7) In general, were there sensitivity analyses that were performed within the Excel file model? Describe in methods.

Reviewer #2: Asamani et al. modeled the health labor market outlook in Kenya and found that there is a need for an increased health workforce and an increase in health workforce budget to employ these skilled workers.

Such analyses are important for countries to take stock and understand the projected needs and costs to permit early intervention, as these will only have future consequences.

I am not a modeler and cannot comment on the equations developed and used, although the methodology does seem intuitively plausible. The findings are relatively straight forward. For a general reader however there is some depth lacking that would be helpful to expand. The discussion is very short. There are therefore some clarifications that would be required:

1. Do the costs for the health care workers include the costs of training? If not, why not?

2. It is mentioned several times that a proportion of health care workers (nearly 1/3 mentioned in the introduction, 14% mentioned in the discussion – the numbers should be consistent throughout?) remain unemployed – please expand here, is this simply because of lack of funds to pay salaries or are there other drivers which may need to be considered in the models? Is this across all cadres or only some? If some, then which? This may be helpful to anticipate some redistribution of training resources

3. There is brief mention of concerns about the quality of nursing training – is this a funding issue or why is this? Are people being rushed through to meet a need? This would be counterintuitive if some nurses are remaining unemployed (unless unemployable)

4. Why does a country actively plan to export nurses if there is a need at home?

5. In theory, if the health care workforce is well trained and adequate could one envisage the disease burden declining? How would this impact the modelling?

6. Page 6, 2nd line of 1st paragraph, word missing “in the labour in the future”

7. Please suggest/hypothesise what an optimal approach/solution would be for Kenya to meet its own needs?

8. the Limitations are very focused, there are other potential sources of error in the data sets used, please mention these.

Reviewer #3: Observed grammatical/ typo mistakes

Page 4: - Over the last decade / then over the last decades – Perhaps be more concise for over the last decades – Suggest state – the years

page 5: 1. Grammar: "The descriptive aspects of the health labour market analysis has been discussed..." should be corrected to "have" .

page 13. Grammar

• "at annual average" should be "at an annual average."

• "the estimate 194,254" should be "the estimated 194,254."

• "are anticipated to by 26.5%" should be "are anticipated to increase by 26.5%."

page 16: Grammar

• “requirements for health workers in Kenya was projected at” → should be “were projected at.”

• "If the dynamics of the disease burden and population’s demographics remains..." → should be "populations' demographics remain..."

Page 17; Grammar/typos

• “The needs-based requirements for the nursing and midwifery workforce was projected...” → should be “were projected.”

• “A further 19% increase in the needed nurses and midwives id projected...” → “is projected.”

• “...projected from the the 2030 requirement...” → should be "the 2030 requirement

page 20

Grammar:

o “...if the disease burden burden is to be tackled” → Repetition of “burden.”

o “Without appropriate mechanisms to increase the throughput from the education pipeline, increase absorption and retention of the trained health workers, the projection show...” → should be "the projections show."

Other:

Consider explaining/ defining the Need Availability Ratio (NAR) – as many readers will not be familiar with this

Recommendations - discussion

Discuss why there’s a high unemployment rate despite health workforce shortages and propose specific solutions to reduce it.

I believe that the discussion should provide more insight and recommendation that would build on the information found in the models

For example:

1. More detail clarifying the roles of various stakeholders ( ex governments, private institution etc) in addressing the employment problems

2. Provide solutions or strategies for increasing training output and retention, which could be highlighted further, such as improving incentives for healthcare workers.

3. Discuss the roll that public/private partnerships may provide

4. Provide more detail on proposed strategies to close the 43$ funding gap and better integrate health workers into the work force - especially in rural and underserved areas

4. Page 4: The increase in the wage bill from KSh 4.97 billion to KSh 7.14 billion (2014–2019) More details are needed on why health outcomes have not met expectations despite these investments.- if known

5. Consider mentioning specific strategies to increase retention, such as government policies or funding for education, to provide actionable recommendations.

6 Highlight strategies for mitigating attrition and increasing training to meet health needs.

Potential risks: It would be nice to have insight in what the future concerns are:

1. Example: It may be helpful to highlight any potential risks or concerns if supply trends are not adjusted to meet future demands.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Nicola Wearne

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003966.r003

Decision Letter 1

Ikechi G Okpechi

4 Dec 2024

PGPH-D-24-02288R1

Modelling the health labour market outlook in Kenya: supply, needs and investment requirements for health workers, 2021 - 2035

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Asamani,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Comments from Reviewer #3 can be seen below.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 03 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ikechi G Okpechi

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria ? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I don't know

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: All comments have been thoroughly addressed.

Reviewer #2: My queries have been answered

Reviewer #3: Just a few comments

In the discussion : the following is very cumbersome: suggest rewriting : As part of efforts to address some of these concerns and foster alignment between education and the needs of the health system, in 2021, Kenya held a conference to improve and harmonize health professions education curricula which led to actionable recommendations such as strengthening regulation and accreditation mechanisms, minimizing quick-fix trainings, and use of competency-based curricula.

Example: To address these concerns and enhance alignment between education and the needs of the health system, Kenya held a conference in 2021 focused on improving and harmonizing health professions education curricula. The conference resulted in actionable recommendations, including strengthening regulation and accreditation mechanisms, reducing reliance on short-term training programs, and implementing competency-based curricula.

Mistake noted:

As a result, it was not feasible to conduct sensitivity analysis which should be considered a limitation "if"should be replaced by "of " this paper.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Nicola Wearne

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003966.r005

Decision Letter 2

Ikechi G Okpechi

23 Dec 2024

Modelling the health labour market outlook in Kenya: supply, needs and investment requirements for health workers, 2021 - 2035

PGPH-D-24-02288R2

Dear Prof Asamani,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Modelling the health labour market outlook in Kenya: supply, needs and investment requirements for health workers, 2021 - 2035' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Ikechi G Okpechi

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Health workforce needs-based analysis tool.

    (XLSM)

    pgph.0003966.s001.xlsm (32.2MB, xlsm)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to peer review comments_26.10.2024.docx

    pgph.0003966.s002.docx (23.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to peer review comments_4. 12.2024.docx

    pgph.0003966.s003.docx (14.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are publicly available within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The full health labour market analysis report is publicly available from the Republic of Kenya labour market observatory (https://labourmarket.go.ke/media/resources/Final_Kenya_HLMA_Report_2023_v8.pdf).


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES