Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 6;16:405. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55842-w

Table 1.

Measured and deduced photophysical data of crystalline and precipitate samples

Compoundsa Wavelength (nm) lifetime (τ/μs) PLQYb kp (s−1)c knr (s−1)c SOC (cm−1)d
Crystalline 2a 471 4.98 (35.7%), 20.7 (64.3%) 3.6% 2.39 × 103 6.39 × 104 4.42
623 3.35 (43.8%), 17.2 (56.2%) 3.22 × 103 8.64 × 104
Precipitate 2a 560 3.16 (25.3%), 5.27 (74.7%) 60% 1.27 × 105 8.44 × 104 9.62 × 101
Crystalline 2b 506 2.63 (99.4%), 18.6 (0.6%) 33% 1.21 × 105 2.46 × 105 2.39 × 102
Precipitate 2b 516 3.06 (37.1%), 4.76 (62.9%) 78% 1.89 × 105 5.33 × 104 2.39 × 102
Precipitate 2c 487 2.05 (44.8%), 4.58 (55.2%) 22% 6.38 × 104 2.26 × 105 1.85 × 102
Precipitate 2d 560 4.60 (30.4%), 10.9 (69.6%) 31% 3.45 × 104 7.69 × 104 6.56 × 101
Precipitate 2e 550 4.40 (31.5%), 13.0 (68.5%) 24% 2.33 × 104 7.38 × 104 3.76 × 101

aCrystalline samples were obtained by layering Et2O on the CHCl3 solution of corresponding digold(I) compounds. Precipitate samples were acquired by adding petroleum ether into dichloromethane solutions of 2a-2e.

bTotal photoluminescence quantum yield.

ckp: phosphorescence radiative rates; knr: non-radiative decay rates. Calculation method see the “Methods” section.

dSOC values of T1-to-S0 transition calculated by TD-DFT. The models used for crystalline samples are based on their corresponding single crystal structures, and those for precipitate samples are based on aurophilic interaction dimer structures.