Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 6;4:261. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00668-8

Table 1.

Summary of cases who took extended courses of Paxlovid outside the context of an acute re-infection and experienced any improvement

Case # Age, gender Date of COVID infection(s) Likely variant Initiation of Long COVID symptoms COVID vaccinations Date and length of extended course of Paxlovid Short-term improvement with Paxlovid Sustained improvement with Paxlovid Adverse effects of Paxlovid
1 56 y.o. man March 2020 original wild type Jul 2020 2021 (Feb, Mar, Nov), 2022 (May, Nov) Jan 2023 (15 d) y y
2 45 y.o. woman March 2022 omicron Apr 2022 2021 (Jan, Feb, 2021), 2022 (Oct) Feb 2023 (15 d) y y y
3 25 y.o. woman May 2022 omicron May 2022 2021 (Apr, Apr, Nov) Jan 2023 (10 d) y y
4 51 y.o. man Aug 2022 omicron Aug 2022 2021 (Apr, May, Nov), 2022 (Aug) Mar 2023 (15 d) y y
5 woman, age undisclosed March 2020 original wild type Mar 2020 5 vaccines beginning in 2021 Jun 2023 (10 d) y y
6 40 y.o. man March 2020 original wild type May 2020 Not specified Sept 2022 (30 d) y y
7 30 y.o. man May 2022, July 2022 omicron, omicron Jul 2022 2021 (Mar, April, Nov) May 2023 (15 d) y

For individuals indicated as having short-term improvements but not sustained improvements, this means that any improvements observed eventually dissipated. For case 4, he started valacyclovir one day before he started the long course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, so it is difficult to determine if the benefits are due to nirmaltrelvir/ritonavir, valacyclovir, or both.