Table 2.
First author, year, country | Aim/objectives | Participants | Design/method (including assessment tools) |
---|---|---|---|
Alexander, 2005, United States 54 | Develop, implement and evaluate a system for pain assessment and monitoring | 41 residents with dementia, 24 from secure unit 17 from open unit |
Quantitative Pilot study, nonexperimental design Coloured Visual Analogue Scale (CVAS) |
Andrews, 2019, Australia 43 | Investigate the quality and completeness of pain documentation and assess the extent to healthcare personnel are engaged in documentation processes | 114 residents with moderate-to-severe dementia, across 4 facilities. 169 pain episodes | Quantitative Descriptive design Review of medical records |
Apinis, 2014, United States 66 | Examine the agreement between the interdisciplinary evaluation and the validated observational pain tools PAINAD and PACSLAC | 67 residents with advanced dementia and moderate-to-severe communication disability, from 6 different nursing home wards | Quantitative Cross-sectional Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) |
Burns, 2015, United Kingdom 56 | (1) Explore nurses’ knowledge about pain assessment for people with dementia, (2) determine the factors that may influence their knowledge and attitudes towards pain assessment, (3) identify nurses’ level of training and education in pain and dementia, (4) explore the perceived barriers of effective pain assessment | 32 registered nurses working in nursing home, regularly caring for people with dementia | Quantitative Cross-sectional survey design Questionnaire, including open-ended questions |
Chang, 2011, South Korea 44 | To clarify and conceptualize pain identification in people with dementia by nurses | 13 nurses from 3 nursing homes | Quantitative Concept development Individual interviews |
Chen, 2015, Taiwan 72 | Investigate the reliability and validity of self-reported pain across groups with different degrees of cognitive function, and to determine the important predictors of self-reported pain intensity in four cognition groups | 341 residents diagnosed with dementia from 12 dementia special care units, and 50 registered nurses Control: 73 cognitively intact residents, from 2 long-term care facilities |
Quantitative Cross-sectional Multifaceted measures to validate residents’ pain reports Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS) Doloplus-2 |
Chen, 2010, Taiwan 63 | Validate registered nurses’ and nurse assistants’ reports in assessing present pain and to investigate potential influencing factors | 304 residents with dementia from 6 dementia special care units 15 registered nurses, 21 nurse assistants |
Quantitative Prospective study Doloplus-2 |
Closs, 2003, United Kingdom 65 | (1) Assess the usability of a range of approaches to pain assessments; (2) identify and develop appropriate verbal and/or nonverbal pain assessments in varying levels of cognitive impairment; (3) relate, where possible, the severity of cognitive impairment to the most appropriate methods of assessment | 113 nursing home residents | Quantitative Cross-sectional Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Colour Pain Analogue Scale (CS) Faces Pain Scale (FS) Mechanical Visual Analogue Scale (MVAS) |
Cohen-Mansfield, 2008, United States 64 | Compare pain assessments using self-report, informant rating and observational assessments | 153 nursing home residents with dementia from 4 nursing homes 84 staff members |
Quantitative Cross-sectional Functional Pain Scale Present Pain Intensity Scale Verbal Descriptor Scale Global Pain Assessment Scale Pain Assessment for Dementing Elderly (PADE) Pain Assessment in Noncommunicative Elderly (PAINE) Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) The checklist of nonverbal pain indicators (CNPI) Observational Pain Behaviour Assessment Instrument (OPBAI) |
Cohen-Mansfield, 2002, United States 45 | (1) To identify the behaviours and other observable indicators that are perceived by nurses to be manifestations of pain, (2) determine what cues are used to differentiate pain from other causes of unusual behaviour, (3) assess nurses’ perceptions of the prevalence and importance of specific indicators of pain, (4) validate the perceptions of nursing staff members concerning the applicability of the pain indicators provided in the previous studies, (5) to examine their perceptions of their own ability to identify pain in this population | 72 staff members from 3 nursing homes | Mixed or multiple methods Individual interviews, survey and focus groups |
Cohen-Mansfield, 2002, United States 60 | Examine the reliability and validity of geriatricians’ assessments of pain | 79 nursing home residents. 31 with mild/moderate cognitive impairment and 48 with severe cognitive impairment 2 geriatricians |
Quantitative Cross-sectional |
Corbett, 2016, United Kingdom 40 | Explore the current landscape of pain management in people with dementia living in nursing homes | 12 healthcare personnel, including junior care assistants, senior carers, nurses and care home managers | Mixed or multiple methods Triangulation of stakeholder consultation and quality review of pain management Focus groups with care home staff |
Ersek, 2011, United States 69 | Explore whether a combination of pain indicators would be significantly better in predicting self-reported pain intensity than any single pain indicator | 326 residents, from 24 nursing homes | Quantitative Chart review, resident interviews, surrogate reports from certified nursing assistants Iowa pain thermometer Checklist for nonverbal pain indicators |
Ford, 2015, United States 55 | Examine ethnic differences in the presentation and intensity of nonverbal pain behaviours among African Americans, Caucasians and Hispanics | 28 residents with moderate-to-severe dementia and pain-related diagnosis, from 4 nursing homes 6 certified nursing assistants |
Quantitative Cross-sectional Noncommunicative Patients Pain Assessment Instrument (NOPPAIN) |
Gilmore-Bykovskyi, 2013, United States 46 | (1) Examine how nurses make decisions to pharmacologically treat pain, as well as identify the conditions that influence treatment decisions, (2) identify conditions that influence nurses’ actions related to pain management | 13 nurses from four facilities (3 licensed practice nurses and 10 registered nurses) | Qualitative In-depth interviews Grounded dimensional analysis |
Kaasalainen, 2007, Canada 39 | Explore the decision-making process of pain management of physicians and nurses and how their attitudes and beliefs about pain affect their decisions about prescribing and administering pain medications | 24 registered nurses and 33 registered practice nurses from 4 nursing homes 9 physicians |
Qualitative Grounded theory Semi-structured, individual interviews |
Karlsson, 2012, Sweden 41 | Interpret certified nursing assistants’ perception of pain | 12 certified nursing assistants working in dementia care | Qualitative Hermeneutic design Individual interviews |
Lautenbacher, 2017, The Netherlands 47 | Identify which facial descriptors are used by caregivers to evaluate and influence their diagnostic decision-making process when assessing pain | 284 residents with dementia (mostly advanced stage) from 79 nursing homes | Quantitative Survey Questionnaire |
Liu, 2012, China 76 | Report the development and implementation of an observational pain assessment protocol and its impacts on pain management. To report the opinions of the nursing home staff about the protocol | 11 healthcare personnel (8 nursing assistants, 2 registered nurses and 1 physiotherapist) 30 residents |
Mixed or multiple methods Intervention: Pre-/posttest Group interviews Chinese version of Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (C-PAINAD) |
Lundin, 2021, Sweden 48 | Describe the experiences of nurses in caring for people with advanced dementia and pain at the end-of-life | 13 registered nurses from 12 nursing homes | Qualitative Descriptive explorative design Individual semi-structured interviews |
Manfredi, 2003, United States 57 | (1) Identify a clinical condition consistently described as painful by residents who were able to verbally communicate the experience of pain (2) Assess the reliability and validity of facial expressions as pain indicators in residents with severe dementia undergoing a painful procedure |
39 residents with decubitus ulcers able to reliably answer questions about pain 9 residents with dementia and decubitus ulcers |
Quantitative |
Mezinskis, 2004, United States 49 | Examine which formal and informal methods of pain assessment nurses and caregivers use | From 14 long-term care facilities: Sample A was 160 direct caregivers (35 registered nurses, 41 licensed practice nurses and 84 certified nursing assistants) Sample B was 307 residents in dementia units, with chronic painful illnesses |
Quantitative Survey/document analysis Sample A: Questionnaire Sample B: Chart review |
Monroe, 2015, United States 50 | Assess nursing home personnel’s cues and practices to identify and alleviate pain | 29 healthcare personnel, including registered nurses and licensed practice nurses with direct care responsibilities, from two long-term care facilities | Qualitative Exploratory study Focus group interviews |
Monroe, 2014, United States 74 | Determine if a diagnosis of dementia influenced pain self-reports and pain medication use | 52 nursing home residents able to self-consent, including 20 people with dementia | Quantitative Between groups, cross-sectional Discomfort Behaviour Scale |
Monroe, 2012, United States 58 | Use medical records to assess advanced cancer pain at the end-of-life | 48 records from 9 nursing homes 43 people with Alzheimer’s dementia (90%), 4 people with vascular dementia (8%) and 1 person with Lewy body dementia (2%) |
Quantitative Retrospective between groups cross-sectional design Retrospective chart audit |
Nakashima, 2019, United States 36 | Compare pain interventions (including assessment) between nursing home residents with and without dementia | 50,673 nursing home residents, 34,658 with dementia | Quantitative Cross-sectional |
Neville, 2006, Australia 71 | A needs analysis of the pain management skills of regional nurses caring for older people with dementia | 197 staff members (120 unlicensed nurses, 19 enrolled nurses and 55 registered nurses) | Quantitative Survey Questionnaire |
Parkman, 2020, United States 51 | (1) Explore the relationship between two observational pain scales, expressed need-driven behaviours and likelihood of medication administration, (2) examined nurses’ perceptions regarding ease of and barriers to use of the scales | 28 nursing home residents with dementia 4 registered nurses and 2 licensed practical nurses |
Mixed or multiple methods Abbey Pain Scale The Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) |
Peisah, 2014, Australia 52 | Explore attitudes and processes relating to pain assessment and management | 20 staff members (10 registered nurses and 6 nurse assistants) | Quantitative Descriptive design A topical survey typology with semi-structured interviews |
Rababa, 2019, Jordan 75 | Examine the relationship among comorbid burden, ability to self-report symptoms, severity of dementia and patient outcomes of pain and agitation | 78 nursing home residents with dementia | Quantitative Descriptive correlational design Discomfort-DAT |
Rababa, 2018, Jordan 70 | Examine temporally based relationships between change in behaviour, the nurses’ level of certainty regarding pain, assessment scope and outcomes of pain | 76 nursing home residents with dementia and known pain or a known pain diagnosis | Quantitative Descriptive correlational design Discomfort-DAT |
Rababa, 2018, Jordan 68 | Examine the associations of pain assessment scope, nurses’ certainty, patient outcomes, and cognitive and verbal characteristics | 76 nursing home residents with dementia and known pain/known pain diagnosis | Quantitative Descriptive correlational design Discomfort-DAT |
Rostad, 2018, Norway 59 | Assess the effectiveness of regular pain assessment on analgesic use and pain score | 112 residents with dementia and unable to self-report, from 16 nursing homes that did not routinely use a pain assessment tool | Quantitative Single-blinded, parallel cluster randomized controlled trial Doloplus-2 |
Scherder, 2004, The Netherlands 73 | Compare the assessment by nursing assistants of pain experienced by residents with the residents’ own evaluation | 20 residents with Alzheimer’s dementia and 17 residents without dementia, from 2 nursing homes. Both groups with chronic painful conditions | Quantitative Case–control study Checklist for Nonverbal Pain Indicators (CNPI) Coloured Analogue Scale (CAS) |
Sloane, 2007, United States 53 | To describe the amount of staff time spent in care provision of morning care and the sources of discomfort and pain that were identified | 17 nursing home residents with dementia who were likely to have chronic pain | Mixed or multiple methods Study and analysis of 51 videotaped morning care and care plans |
Vitou, 2022, France 61 | To analyse whether a diagnosis label of Alzheimer’s disease or the stage of the disease may bias pain assessment scores and empathic reactions of healthcare staff in nursing homes | 152 certified nursing assistants From 19 nursing homes |
Quantitative Experimental between subjects’ design Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Algoplus |
Vitou, 2021, France 62 | (1) Characterize pain assessment behaviours; (2) compare assessments with individuals with no professional experience in the field of care (controls) and (3) explore the impact of demographic, psychological and socio-professional determinants on pain assessment | 50 certified nursing assistants from 5 nursing homes Controls: 96 adults living in the community |
Quantitative Experimental between subjects’ design Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Algoplus |
Yang, 2024, China 42 | To elucidate the methodologies employed by nursing assistants in identification and management of pain | 17 nursing assistants | Qualitative Phenomenological design Semi-structured individual interviews |
Zahid, 2020, Canada 67 | (1) Evaluate whether pain assessment frequency improved with the use of the tablet app compared with that for the paper-and-pencil method of administration of the PACSLAC-II, (2) evaluate the impact of each method of administration of the PACSLAC-II on frontline staff stress and burnout levels, (3) obtain the perspectives of healthcare personnel on each method of administration | 121 staff (33 registered nurses and 88 special care aides) | Mixed or multiple methods Case series design, quasi-experimental and exploratory design Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate II (PACSLAC-II) |