Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 7;25:4. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13310-6

Table 4.

Simple logistic regression for the factors associated with barriers to cervical cancer screening among study participants

Socio-demographics Having an emotional barrier Having a practical barrier Having a cognitive barrier
COR CI p COR CI p COR CI p
Age (years) 1.02 0.98–1.05 0.266 1.03 0.99–1.07 0.054 0.967 0.941–0.995 0.021*
Marital status
 Single (ref) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Married 1.21 0.61–2.41 0.570 0.97 0.48–1.96 0.944 0.89 0.53–1.52 0.693
 Divorced/widow 0.36 0.04–2.98 0.350 1.73 0.50–5.96 0.380 1.00 0.33-3.00 0.997
Women education Level
 Primary (ref.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Secondary 1.45 0.53-4.00 0.464 2.07 0.64–6.66 0.219 0.54 0.24–1.22 0.142
 Tertiary 1.68 0.66–4.27 0.270 2.61 0.88–7.75 0.083 0.44 0.21–0.92 0.030
Women’s income Level (MYR)
 < 2000 3.00 0.32–27.76 0.333 0.50 0.09–2.76 0.427 0.900 0.232–3.493 0.879
 2000–4500(ref.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Women occupation Status
 Employed (ref.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Unemployed 0.32 0.12–0.83 0.020* 0.90 0.26–3.12 0.872 2.25 1.03–4.89 0.040*
 Others (still studying, retired, others) 0.83 0.38–1.79 0.638 3.18 1.07–9.40 0.036* 0.63 0.33–1.23 0.185
No. of children
 ≥3 (ref.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 <3 1.05 0.54–2.02 0.876 0.83 0.43–1.60 0.581 1.08 0.64–1.83 0.758
Husband Education Level
 Primary (ref.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Secondary 1.02 0.38–2.72 0.955 0.67 0.20–2.23 0.516 1.66 0.63–4.38 0.303
 Tertiary 0.69 0.28–1.67 0.412 0.80 0.29–2.13 0.656 1.17 0.52–2.62 0.691
Husband income Level (MYR)
 < 2000 0.70 0.22–2.18 0.539 0.60 0.17–2.14 0.435 1.66 0.64–4.24 0.290
 2000–4500 0.28 0.06–1.31 0.108 0.80 0.20–3.15 0.756 2.23 0.75–6.62 0.147
 > 4500 (ref.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Husband occupation Status
 Employed (ref.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Unemployed 1.33 0.59-3.00 0.480 1.43 0.61–3.33 0.402 0.64 0.32–1.28 0.217
 Others (still studying, retired, others) 0.79 0.28–2.21 0.658 1.47 0.57–3.74 0.417 0.89 0.40–1.95 0.779

*Significant at p < 0.05

Note: History of Cancer was not included as the number of participants in the “yes” group is 4 which distorts the results