Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 23. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1039/d4ay01921k

Table 1. Summary of traditional methods used for HPV detection112.

Detection method Pros Cons
DNA level PCR Simple, quick sensitive highly specific Easy to cross-contamination between samples high false positive rate perform HPV typing operations is tedious
DNA ISH High specificity can be used for localization detection Detection is affected by the DNA content in the specimen results are sometimes difficult to explain
mRNA level RT-PCR High sensitivity high specificity accurately reflects the transcription activity of viral oncogenes Requires technical expertise testing fresh frozen tissue
RNA ISH High sensitivity high specificity to some extent, it can be used as the “gold standard” for HPV-related tumors The experimental operation requires high experience poor repeatability
Protein level p16 immunohistochemistry High sensitivity strong prognostic indicators Low specificity mainly used for the detecting HPV in oropharyngeal cancer
IHC Virus antigen detection easy to perform and locate False-negative findings and low sensitivity