Table 3.
Radiation therapy for esophageal cancer: indications and pros and cons
| Treatment method | Indication | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy | - Locally advanced or inoperable patients, can precisely target tumor areas | - Non-invasive; effective for patients who cannot undergo surgery | - Potential side effects include radiation-induced esophagitis and pneumonia |
| IMRT | - Tumors in complex locations or near critical structures, IMRT optimizes dose distribution and reduces damage to normal tissues | - Precise targeting reduces radiation exposure to surrounding tissues | - Requires advanced technology and may still lead to side effects, especially if not optimally targeted |
| Proton therapy | - For tumors in complex locations or recurrence after radiation therapy, proton therapy provides higher precision | - Higher precision in targeting tumors, reducing damage to surrounding tissues | - Expensive and limited availability in some regions |
| Chemoradiotherapy combined | - For locally advanced or inoperable patients, chemoradiotherapy improves treatment outcomes and survival rates | - Enhanced local control and survival rates when chemotherapy is combined with radiotherapy | - Increased side effects due to the combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy |
IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy.