Table 2.
Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Devices FDA-Cleared for use in Primary Headache Disorders
Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) | Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) | Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) | External trigeminal nerve stimulation (eTNS) | External concurrent occipital and trigeminal nerve stimulation (eCOT-NS) | External trigeminal nerve stimulation (eTNS) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brand Name | Nerivio® | GammaCore™ | SAVI dual™, eNeura Inc. SpringTMS® | Cefaly® | Relivion® |
HeadaTerm1, HeadaTerm2 |
Cost (as of 06/2024) | $49 for 18 uses first device, afterwards $89 per device | $600 every 3 months | $395 monthly subscription | $421+ one-time cost | $150 for 60 days, total $650 after, or $75 per month |
HeadaTerm1: $49 one-time cost HeadaTerm2: $99.99 one-time cost |
Device Wearability | Armband adhesive (latex- free) | Handheld, used with electroconductive gel (depending on the brand, may or may not contain latex) | Handheld; no adhesive | Forehead adhesive (latex free) | Headband with water-based electrodes | Forehead adhesive (non-latex) |
Stimulation Type | Electric | Electric | Magnetic | Electric | Electric | Electric |
Target and Therapeutic Effect |
Nociceptive receptors of the upper arm Induction of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the brainstem via peripheral nerves |
Vagus nerve (right or left) Modulation of the autonomic nervous system, inhibition of cortical spreading depression, and alteration of nociceptive trigeminovascular neurotransmission, as well as descending pain pathways [28–30] |
Occiput Modulates cortical spreading depression, neurotransmission of GABAergic circuits, and thalamocortical activity [50, 51] |
Ophthalmic Nerve (V1)- Supraorbital and Supratrochlear Branches Therapeutic effect is unclear |
Supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves, greater occipital nerves Neurotransmission of trigeminal and occipital inputs to the trigeminocervical complex in the brainstem [70] |
Ophthalmic Nerve (V1)- Supraorbital and Supratrochlear Branches Therapeutic effect is unclear |
Mechanism of Action | Electrical signal of a symmetrical biphasic square pulse with a modulated frequency of 100‐120 Hz, a pulse width of 400 μs, and an output current up to 40 mA [17] | Electrical signal comprising a 5-kHz sine wave burst lasting for 1 ms (5 sine waves, each lasting 200 μs), with such bursts repeated once every 40 ms (25 Hz), generating a 24-V peak voltage and 60-mA peak output current | Single pulse of magnetic stimulation | Rectangular biphasic compensated impulses with an electrical mean equal to zero, 250 µS impulse width, 60 Hz frequency, maximum intensity of 16 mA with a progressive slope from 1 to 16 mA over 14 min | Electrical signal comprising a phase width 100 [micro]s, a pulse frequency 0.33 Hz, trigeminal stimulation intensity up to 5 mA, and occipital stimulation intensity up to 7 mA | Pulse repetition frequency of 50 Hz, a pulse width of 125 μs, and an impulse amplitude of 60 V |
FDA Indication(s) for Adults |
cCH preventive [37] eCH acute [36] |
Preventive treatment of migraine [54] Acute treatment of migraine [52] |
Preventive treatment of migraine [66] |
EM acute [70] CM acute [70] |
Acute treatment of migraine [68] | |
Adverse Effects | Paraesthesias and dysesthesias, warmth, muscle spasms, temporary numbness, pain in the arm, shoulders or neck |
Application site discomfort Muscle twitching, Pain in face, head, teeth |
Transient light headedness Scalp discomfort or tingling Tinnitus Dizziness |
Stimulation-induced paresthesia or dysesthesias Sleepiness Skin irritation Nausea |
Paraesthesias and dysesthesias, temporary numbness, skin irritation and erythema, | None listed |
Safety Considerations |
Not evaluated in persons with congestive heart failure, severe cardiac or cerebrovascular disease Should be applied over dry, healthy skin with normal physical sensation and without any metallic implants or in proximity to cancerous lesions |
Not evaluated in patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis, cervical vagotomy, clinically significant hyper/hypotension or brady/tachycardia Not evaluated in patients with metallic devices implanted at/near neck (stent, bone plate/screw) |
Long-term effects of sTMS are unknown | Not evaluated in patients who have received supraorbital nerve blocks or Botox treatment in the prior 4 months | Not evaluated in patients with suspected or diagnosed heart disease or epilepsy | None listed |
Contraindications |
Uncontrolled Epilepsy Any active implanted electrical device |
Any implanted electronic medical device Simultaneous use of another portable electronic device |
Conductive metal implants in the head and neck |
Metallic or electric devices implanted in the head Cardiac pacemaker or implanted or wearable defibrillator Pain of unknown origin |
Metal implants or shrapnel in the head (except dental implants) Recent (< 3 months) brain or facial trauma Skin abrasions on the forehead or occiput at the contact area Implanted neurostimulators or any implanted metallic or electronic device in the head Cardiac pacemaker or an implanted or wearable defibrillator |
None listed |
Evidence for safety during pregnancy |
Retrospective case control study of 140 women (59 REN, 81 controls) did not show a difference in pregnancy outcomes [23] Daily TENS usage on the abdomen in pregnant mice showed no teratogenic effects [24] An RCT for the use of TENS device for pregnancy-related pelvic pain in 30 patients did not reveal any negative impact during pregnancy [25] RCT of acupuncture vs. TENS device use for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy in 113 women did not show negative related birth outcomes [26] |
One retrospective review of invasive VNS in 44 pregnancies did not reveal birth defects or developmental complications [48] A cohort study looking at use invasive VNS treatment during pregnancy, showed increased obstetrical complications but no teratogenicity [49] Invasive VNS stimulation in pregnant rats 6–7 days before delivery showed that neither pup viability nor number of cells labeled for pro-inflammatory cytokines in the nucleus tractus solitarii or hypoglossal motor nucleus was impaired by VNS [46] Invasive VNS can potentially have a protective effect in pregnant rats with pre-eclampsia model [47] |
Repetitive TMS for the treatment of anxiety/depression during pregnancy was not associated with poor cognitive or motor development outcomes for the fetus [57–59] A case control study of 30 pregnant patients who received rTMS vs. controls did not show a difference in motor or cognitive outcomes of their children at ages 18–62 months [57] Exposure to MRI (without contrast) during the first trimester of pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of harm to the fetus [60] |
Not evaluated previously, but e-TNS device used for depression in one case [69] |
Not evaluated previously, but e-TNS device used for depression in one case [69] Two cases two patients with invasive occipital stimulation during pregnancy resulted in 4 healthy pregnancies [72, 73] |
Not evaluated previously, but e-TNS device used for depression in one case [69] |
Level of evidence in safety during pregnancy (using Sackett criteria [75]) | Level III | Level IV | Level III | Level U | Level U | Level U |
Six non-invasive FDA-cleared devices for primary headache, mainly for migraine, include two devices using external trigeminal stimulation (A-B), transcranial magnetic stimulation (C) non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation (D), remote electrical neuromodulation (E) and combined trigeminal and occipital neuromodulation (F). Level of safety evidence of the neuromodulatory devices during pregnancy was calculated using Sackett criteria. Other relevant safety data was included, which encompasses other devices with similar functionality to the devices depicted above and/or used for different indications, as well as animal studies, and fetal outcomes