Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 7;16:219. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54863-1

Fig. 6. Heatmap of the percentage difference in cumulative bite rates between fsRIDL and TMT simulations under different input parameter combinations.

Fig. 6

The influence of key parameters (polyandry, release ratio, and density-dependent mortality) on the comparative ability of fsRIDL or TMT to reduce blood feeding rates was determined by sensitivity analysis. The data shown are the average of ten simulations performed per technology and parameter value combination. Positive values (blue) indicate relatively lower bite rates for fsRIDL simulations, and negative values (red) indicate lower bite rates for TMT simulations. Source data are available through Zenodo under accession code 13927099.