Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 8;25:3. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02441-w

Table 2.

Description of included studies

Author Year Location of data No. of sites or centres Sample Statistical analysis conducted Clustering by site taken into account
Abrahams, N., et al. [23] 2010 South Africa 2 253 Per-protocol analysis stratified by site, Logistic regression, chi-square No
Baeten,J.M. et al. [24] 2012 Uganda and Kenya 2 4758 Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, No
Baeten, J. M., et al. [25] 2016 Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. 15 2629 Cox regression stratified according to the site No
Celum, C. et. Al. [26] 2021 South Africa and Zimbabwe 3 451 Logistic and linear regression stratified by site, per-protocol analysis, Kaplan-Meier plot, and complete case analysis No
Chung, M. H., et al. [27] 2020 Kenya 3 991 Sensitivity analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, the log-rank test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression No
Coovadia, H. M., et al. [28] 2012 South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe 4 1527 Kaplan-Meier method using Greenwood's formula with log-rank test and Pearson χ² test statistic: No
Dabis, F., et al [29] 1999 Côte d’Ivoire and Burkina Faso. 2 421 Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test, chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier survival technique and log-rank test. Cox multivariate proportional hazards model. No
de Bruyn, G., et al. [30] 2011 Zimbabwe and South Africa 3 2016 Stratified Cox model, sensitivity analyses No
Delany-Moretlwe, S. et al. [31] 2018 South Africa 9 2059 Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test stratified by site. Poisson model with study group and site as the main effects. Cox regression adjusted for baseline covariates. Logistic regression generalized estimation equation model, and logistic regression and time-varying Cox regression model stratified by site Yes
Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium [32] 2019 Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia. 12 7829 Cox proportional hazards regression, Kaplan-Meier plots, subgroup analyses No
Halpern, V., et al. [33] 2008 Nigeria 4 1644 Exact log-rank test stratified by site, proportional hazards regression model, and Poisson assumption No
Karim A, et al. [34] 2011 South Africa 2 1085 Poisson distribution, Fisher's exact test, unpaired t-test/Wilcoxon two-sample test and Proportional hazards regression models No
Marrazzo, J. M. et al. [35] 2015 South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. 15 5029 Cox proportional-hazards models stratified by site (cox regression), Multivariate survival analyses. GEE with a binomial link, exchangeable correlation structure, and robust standard errors Yes
Maskew, M., et al. [36] 2020 South Africa 3 601 Generalized linear models No
Mavedzenge, S. N. et al. [37] 2010 Zimbabwe and South Africa 3 4968 Cox proportional hazard regression No
McCormack, S. et. Al. [38] 2010 South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia 13 9385 Cox proportional hazards regression was stratified by the clinic. Logistic regression. Subgroup analysis: one subgroup analysis was stratified by the research centre, and one was done with post-randomisation No
Mensch, B. S., et al. [39] 2016 South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe 15 5029 Linear and logistic regression models No
Moodley, D., et al. [40] 2003 South Africa 11 1317 Kaplan-Meier analysis, logistic regression, Cox regression, and t-tests and chi-square tests No
Mugo, N. R., et al. [41] 2014 Kenya and Uganda 9 1785 Cox proportional hazards were stratified by study site, GEE logistic regression, linear mixed-effects models, and their interaction as fixed effects and participants as random effects. Yes
Nagot, N., et al. [5] 2016 Burkina Faso, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia. 4 1273 Turnbull’s extension of the Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, piecewise model to compare survival curves and Fisher’s exact test No
Nel, A. et. Al. [42] 2021 South Africa and Uganda 6 941 A paired t-test and a mixed model with repeated measures of age, research centre, and centre-by-visit interaction were used. Yes
Nel, A. et. Al. [43] 2016 Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania and South Africa 10 280 Risk ratio No
Nel, A. et. Al. [44] 2016 South Africa and Uganda 7 1959 Two-sided log-rank test stratified according to the research centre and Subgroup analysis No
Odeny, T. A., et al. [45] 2012 Kenya 12 1200 Poisson regression with robust error variance No
Padian, N. S., et al. [6] 2007 Zimbabwe and South Africa 3 4948 subgroup analyses, stratified Cox model, Generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression Yes
Rosen, S., et al. [46] 2019 South Africa and Kenya 6 1077 Linear probability model with robust standard errors and log-linear generalized linear model with robust standard errors Yes
Shapiro, R. L., et al. [47] 2006 Botswana 4 709 Fisher's exact test, Zelen's exact tests, and logistic regression models No
Skoler-Karpoff, S., et al. [48] 2008 South Africa 3 6202 Log-rank test stratified by site, Cox proportional hazards regression, Wilcoxon test No
Taha, T. E., et al. [49] 2004 Malawi 6 889 Exact tests and t-tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Logistic regression to adjust comparisons of HIV infection No
The Khesho Bora team [50] 2011 Burkina Faso, Kenya and South Africa 5 824 Student's t-test and χ² test, Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates, log-rank tests stratified by centre, and logistic regression stratified by centre. No
The Petra study team [51] 2002 Uganda, Tanzania and South Africa 5 1457 Relative risks, analysis stratified by site, Turnbull analysis, Student's t-test, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test. No
Thior, I., et al. [52] 2006 Botswana 4 1200 Fisher exact test (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for discrete (continuous), Kaplan-Meier estimator, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards modelling. No
Van Damme L., et Al. [53] 2012 Kenya, South Africa and Tanzania 4 2021 Proportional-hazards regression model stratified according to the study site No
Waitt, C. et. Al. [54] 2019 South Africa and Uganda 2 60 Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and sensitivity analysis No