Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Sep 1;17(17):4905–4908. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.4905

CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing-a three-way connection.

A Razin 1
PMCID: PMC1170819  PMID: 9724627

Abstract

The three-way connection between DNA methylation, gene activity and chromatin structure has been known for almost two decades. Nevertheless, the molecular link between methyl groups on the DNA and the positioning of nucleosomes to form an inactive chromatin configuration was missing. This review discusses recent experimental data that may, for the first time, shed light on this molecular link. MeCP2, which is a known methylcytosine-binding protein, has been shown to possess a transcriptional repressor domain (TRD) that binds the corepressor mSin3A. This corepressor protein constitutes the core of a multiprotein complex that includes histone deacetylases (HDAC1 and HDAC2). Transfection and injection experiments with methylated constructs have revealed that the silenced state of a methylated gene, which is associated with a deacetylated nucleosomal structure, could be relieved by the deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A. Thus, methylation plays a pivotal role in establishing and maintaining an inactive state of a gene by rendering the chromatin structure inaccessible to the transcription machinery.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (156.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ball D. J., Gross D. S., Garrard W. T. 5-methylcytosine is localized in nucleosomes that contain histone H1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5490–5494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bednarik D. P., Cook J. A., Pitha P. M. Inactivation of the HIV LTR by DNA CpG methylation: evidence for a role in latency. EMBO J. 1990 Apr;9(4):1157–1164. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08222.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyes J., Bird A. Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):327–333. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05055.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buschhausen G., Wittig B., Graessmann M., Graessmann A. Chromatin structure is required to block transcription of the methylated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Mar;84(5):1177–1181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Croston G. E., Kerrigan L. A., Lira L. M., Marshak D. R., Kadonaga J. T. Sequence-specific antirepression of histone H1-mediated inhibition of basal RNA polymerase II transcription. Science. 1991 Feb 8;251(4994):643–649. doi: 10.1126/science.1899487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gruenbaum Y., Szyf M., Cedar H., Razin A. Methylation of replicating and post-replicated mouse L-cell DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Aug;80(16):4919–4921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.16.4919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jeppesen P., Turner B. M. The inactive X chromosome in female mammals is distinguished by a lack of histone H4 acetylation, a cytogenetic marker for gene expression. Cell. 1993 Jul 30;74(2):281–289. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90419-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson C. A., Goddard J. P., Adams R. L. The effect of histone H1 and DNA methylation on transcription. Biochem J. 1995 Feb 1;305(Pt 3):791–798. doi: 10.1042/bj3050791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones P. L., Veenstra G. J., Wade P. A., Vermaak D., Kass S. U., Landsberger N., Strouboulis J., Wolffe A. P. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat Genet. 1998 Jun;19(2):187–191. doi: 10.1038/561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kadosh D., Struhl K. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):365–371. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80217-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kass S. U., Landsberger N., Wolffe A. P. DNA methylation directs a time-dependent repression of transcription initiation. Curr Biol. 1997 Mar 1;7(3):157–165. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(97)70086-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Keshet I., Lieman-Hurwitz J., Cedar H. DNA methylation affects the formation of active chromatin. Cell. 1986 Feb 28;44(4):535–543. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90263-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuo M. H., Brownell J. E., Sobel R. E., Ranalli T. A., Cook R. G., Edmondson D. G., Roth S. Y., Allis C. D. Transcription-linked acetylation by Gcn5p of histones H3 and H4 at specific lysines. Nature. 1996 Sep 19;383(6597):269–272. doi: 10.1038/383269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levine A., Cantoni G. L., Razin A. Inhibition of promoter activity by methylation: possible involvement of protein mediators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 1;88(15):6515–6518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Levine A., Yeivin A., Ben-Asher E., Aloni Y., Razin A. Histone H1-mediated inhibition of transcription initiation of methylated templates in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 15;268(29):21754–21759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nan X., Campoy F. J., Bird A. MeCP2 is a transcriptional repressor with abundant binding sites in genomic chromatin. Cell. 1997 Feb 21;88(4):471–481. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81887-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nan X., Ng H. H., Johnson C. A., Laherty C. D., Turner B. M., Eisenman R. N., Bird A. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature. 1998 May 28;393(6683):386–389. doi: 10.1038/30764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pazin M. J., Kadonaga J. T. What's up and down with histone deacetylation and transcription? Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):325–328. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80211-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pollack Y., Stein R., Razin A., Cedar H. Methylation of foreign DNA sequences in eukaryotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6463–6467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Razin A., Cedar H. DNA methylation and gene expression. Microbiol Rev. 1991 Sep;55(3):451–458. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.3.451-458.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Razin A., Cedar H. Distribution of 5-methylcytosine in chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):2725–2728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Razin A., Shemer R. DNA methylation in early development. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4(Spec No):1751–1755. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.suppl_1.1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sheridan P. L., Mayall T. P., Verdin E., Jones K. A. Histone acetyltransferases regulate HIV-1 enhancer activity in vitro. Genes Dev. 1997 Dec 15;11(24):3327–3340. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.24.3327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sobel R. E., Cook R. G., Perry C. A., Annunziato A. T., Allis C. D. Conservation of deposition-related acetylation sites in newly synthesized histones H3 and H4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 14;92(4):1237–1241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.4.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Taunton J., Hassig C. A., Schreiber S. L. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science. 1996 Apr 19;272(5260):408–411. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5260.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tazi J., Bird A. Alternative chromatin structure at CpG islands. Cell. 1990 Mar 23;60(6):909–920. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90339-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Thoma F., Koller T., Klug A. Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J Cell Biol. 1979 Nov;83(2 Pt 1):403–427. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ura K., Kurumizaka H., Dimitrov S., Almouzni G., Wolffe A. P. Histone acetylation: influence on transcription, nucleosome mobility and positioning, and linker histone-dependent transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 1997 Apr 15;16(8):2096–2107. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Verreault A., Kaufman P. D., Kobayashi R., Stillman B. Nucleosome assembly by a complex of CAF-1 and acetylated histones H3/H4. Cell. 1996 Oct 4;87(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81326-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wigler M., Levy D., Perucho M. The somatic replication of DNA methylation. Cell. 1981 Apr;24(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90498-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wolffe A. P. Dominant and specific repression of Xenopus oocyte 5S RNA genes and satellite I DNA by histone H1. EMBO J. 1989 Feb;8(2):527–537. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03407.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wolffe A. P. Transcriptional control. Sinful repression. Nature. 1997 May 1;387(6628):16–17. doi: 10.1038/387016a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zitnik G., Peterson K., Stamatoyannopoulos G., Papayannopoulou T. Effects of butyrate and glucocorticoids on gamma- to beta-globin gene switching in somatic cell hybrids. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;15(2):790–795. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES