Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 5:1–16. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.21

Table 1. Efficacy Results of Studies in FLa.

Trial Regimen Study population ORR, % mPFS mOS
Immunomodulatory therapy
McLaughlin, Piro, and Davis trials Rituximab R/R low-grade or follicular NHL (N = 296) 36–57
AUGMENT Lenalidomide + rituximab R/R FL, ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy, not rituximab-refractory (n = 295) 80 39.4 months 95% at 2 yearsb
Rituximab 55 13.9 months 86% at 2 yearsb
CAR T-cell therapy
ZUMA-5 Axicabtagene ciloleucel 3L R/R FL (n = 123) 94 73% at 18 monthsc 92% at 18 monthsb
ELARA Tisagenlecleucel 3L R/R FL (N = 97) 86 67% at 12 monthsc
Bispecific antibody therapy
GO29781 Mosunetuzumab 3L R/R FL (N = 90) 80 17.9 months 90% at 18 monthsb
EZH2 inhibitor
E7438-G000-101 Tazemetostat 3L R/R FLd (N = 99) 51 12 months NR
PI3K inhibitor
CHRONOS-1 Copanlisib 3L R/R FL (n = 104) 59 11.2 months

Note. 3L = third-line; CAR T-cell therapy = chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; EZH2 = enhancer of zeste homolog 2; FL = follicular lymphoma; mOS = median overall survival; mPFS = median progression-free survival; NHL = non-Hodgkin lymphoma; NR = not reported; ORR = objective response rate; PI3K = phosphoinositide 3 kinase; R/R = relapsed/refractory.

a

Table 1 does not represent head-to-head trials. Head-to-head trials have not been conducted among the listed agents.

b

OS; estimated from survival curves when not available.

c

PFS; estimated from survival curves when not available.

d

Includes wildtype and mutant-type EZH2.