Table 6.
Studies comparing difference between calculated and measured dose using the range, mean and standard deviation for bladder in vivo dosimetry.
| Study | Dosimeter | Range (% or Gy) | Mean (% or Gy) | Standard Deviation (%) | Median | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allahverdi et al (2013) [32] | Semiconductor diode | –22 to +48 % | 11 % | − | − | − |
| Inoue et al (1980) [42] | Semiconductor diode | − | 99.5 % | +/−11.2 % | − | − |
| Waldhäusl et al (2005) [38] | Semiconductor diode | −27 % to + 26 % | 4 % | − | − | ICRU bladder reference point was underestimated by the calculated in-vivo dose by a range of 12 to 162 % (mean 58 %) (range 0.5 to 5.3 Gy, average 2 Gy). All applications showed a higher dose at the ICRU bladder reference point. |
| Jaberi et al (2022) [25] | TLD | − | −7.2 % | +/−14.6 % | − | − |