Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 8;5(2):100650. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100650

Table 3.

Primary Endpoint: Proportion of Participants with ≥2-Step Improvement in ETDRS DRSS from Baseline at Week 36 Measured in the Study Eye

Parameter Placebo (n = 47) Vicasinabin 30 mg (n = 48) Vicasinabin 200 mg (n = 43)
Number of participants (n) 38 42 35
Proportion of participants, n (%) 3 (7.9) 4 (9.5) 2 (5.7)
(95% CI) (2.7, 20.8) (3.8, 22.1) (1.6, 18.6)
Stratified analysis (CMH) (vs. placebo)
Percentage differencea (95% CI)b NA 1.2 (−11.9, 14.2) −2.9 (−15.2, 9.1)
P value 0.8586 0.6388
Stratified analysis (CMH) (30 vs. 200 mg)
Percentage differencea (95% CI)b NA NA 4.4 (−7.2, 15.9)
P value 0.4608

CI = confidence interval; CMH = Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test; DRSS = Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale.

a

Based on the CMH estimate of the common risk difference using Mantel-Haenszelstratum weights and the Sato variance estimator.

b

Wilson's method.