Table 3.
Effect of ABCG2(2) on the breeding values of the daughters of the heterozygous sires and QTL effects derived from the animal model analyses
Quantitative traits
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis | Genotypea | Number of cows | Kg milk | Kg fat | Kg protein | % Fat | % Protein |
Class effectsb | -/- | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+/- | 328 | -185 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.059 | 0.065 | |
+/+ | 264 | -432**** | 4.2** | 3.3** | 0.169**** | 0.145**** | |
% Dominancec | 14.3 | 80.9 | 27.3 | 30.2* | 17.2* | ||
Regressiond | 670 | -226**** | 2.6** | 1.8** | 0.093**** | 0.076**** | |
Animal modeld | -597 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.225 | 0.193 |
Significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
581S was denoted the “-” QTL allele; Y581 was denoted the “+” QTL allele
Significance of the class effect is indicated in the +/+ row. Effects are computed relative to the -/- homozygote
Relative to the -/- homozygote
Allele substitution effects assuming additivity