Table 2.
Summary of structural modification of polymers, improvement, and deterioration of dielectric properties.
S/N | Structural Modification | Improvement in Dielectric | Deterioration in Dielectric Properties | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Increase in free volume via rigid backbone (e.g., SO2-PPO) | Increased ε′ due to improved dipole alignment (ε′ = 8.2) | Increased dipole rotation and mobility leads to decrease in ε″. | [40,44] |
2 | Blending PEI and PVH | Higher ε′ from dipole alignment due to PVH groups | Limited ε′ at high PEI content due to constrained dipole mobility. | [45] |
3 | Methyl side groups | None observed | Increased free volume lowers ε′ | [22] |
4 | Rigid polymer chains (e.g., PPO) | Reduced ε″ due to restricted dipole mobility | Minimal ε′, reduced flexibility. | [52] |
5 | Nanofillers with high ε′ (e.g., BaTiO3, CNFs, BST) | Higher ε′, enhanced interfacial polarization | Reduced EBD due to inhomogeneous fields at high filler volume. | [75,108] |
6 | Use of low-ε′ fillers (e.g., alumina) | Improved ε′ with stable EBD | None observed. | [104] |
7 | Smaller nanoparticle sizes (<20 nm) | Enhanced ε′ due to larger interfacial regions | None observed. | [104] |
8 | 1-D nanorods in nanocomposites | Significant ε′ improvement due to extended interfacial regions | None observed. | [105] |
9 | Blending PI with PEI | Higher EBD, reduced void density (EBD ~1000 MV/m) | None observed. | [28] |
10 | Cyclic polystyrene (cPS) vs. linear polystyrene | 50% enhancement in EBD, 80% increase in energy density | None observed. | [55] |
11 | Multilayered structures (e.g., PC and P[VDF-HFP]) | Increased EBD via barrier effect | None observed. | [130,131] |
12 | Nanoconfinement | Increased EBD and ε″ | Reduction in ε′. | [121,122,123,127] |
13 | Polymer chain annealing | Improved EBD and reduced ε″ | None observed. | [64] |