Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 11;13(24):7529. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247529

Table 1.

Descriptive table listing all 10 items included in the questionnaire, organized by their corresponding domains. The questionnaire used a 5-point Likert-type agree–disagree scale and includes responses from all eight healthcare providers (response rate: 100%). Results are displayed as medians, with the interquartile range (IQR) shown in parentheses.

Item Domain Questions
All Started with ‘From Your Perspective:…’
Median Score on 5-Point Likert Scale (IQR)
1. Usefulness The dashboard visualized a clear overview of data items 4 (3.5–4.5)
2. Usefulness The dashboard was simple and easy to understand 4 (3.5–5)
3. Interface The dashboard interface was pleasant 4 (4–5)
4. Interface You liked using the functions of the dashboard 4 (4–4)
5. Reliability You thought that the dashboard reports were reliable 4 (3–4)
6. Reliability You thought that the dashboard correctly presented the missing data items 4 (3–4.5)
7. Effectiveness The dashboard motivated you to register all data items 5 (4–5)
8. Effectiveness The dashboard improved your awareness of data registry 5 (4.3–5)
9. Adaption Weekly receiving the dashboard was a good frequency 5 (3–5)
10. Adaption I thought it was easily integrated in routine work 4 (4–5)