Table 1.
Descriptive table listing all 10 items included in the questionnaire, organized by their corresponding domains. The questionnaire used a 5-point Likert-type agree–disagree scale and includes responses from all eight healthcare providers (response rate: 100%). Results are displayed as medians, with the interquartile range (IQR) shown in parentheses.
| Item | Domain | Questions All Started with ‘From Your Perspective:…’ |
Median Score on 5-Point Likert Scale (IQR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Usefulness | The dashboard visualized a clear overview of data items | 4 (3.5–4.5) |
| 2. | Usefulness | The dashboard was simple and easy to understand | 4 (3.5–5) |
| 3. | Interface | The dashboard interface was pleasant | 4 (4–5) |
| 4. | Interface | You liked using the functions of the dashboard | 4 (4–4) |
| 5. | Reliability | You thought that the dashboard reports were reliable | 4 (3–4) |
| 6. | Reliability | You thought that the dashboard correctly presented the missing data items | 4 (3–4.5) |
| 7. | Effectiveness | The dashboard motivated you to register all data items | 5 (4–5) |
| 8. | Effectiveness | The dashboard improved your awareness of data registry | 5 (4.3–5) |
| 9. | Adaption | Weekly receiving the dashboard was a good frequency | 5 (3–5) |
| 10. | Adaption | I thought it was easily integrated in routine work | 4 (4–5) |