Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 14.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 2;30(8):859–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.10.013

Table 3.

Caregiver’ outcomes reported by RCT and non-RCT comparison group studies.

Study Anxiety Burden Depression Distress/stress Quality of life Other
Groppo (2012) (20) ^
Stella (2011); Canonici (2012) (21,22) ^
Viola (2011) (23) ^
Aboulafia-Brakha (2014) (24) a
Avila (2007) (25)
Bottino (2005) (26)
Campos (2019) (27) b
Danucalov (2013; 2017) (28,29) c
Ferreira (2016) (30) d
Kamkhagi (2015) (31) e
Marinho (2021) (32)
Martini de Oliveira (2019) (33)
Novelli (2018) (34)
Prado Sanchez (2020) (35)
Suemoto (2014) (36)
Alvarez (2018) (*) (37)
Arango-Lasprilla (2014) (38) f
Guerra (2011) (39) g
Serrani (2012) (40)
Villareal-Reyna (2012) (41) h
Total studies (n=20) including the outcome. 4 11 5 7 7 8
Percentage of studies who measured the outcome with positive results 25% (1) 54.5% (6) 60% (3) 42.9% (2) 57.1% (4) 75% (6)
^

= non-RCT comparison group studies; PLWD: Person living with dementia; ▲= improvement; ▬ = no differences; [blank space]: outcome not included in the study.

a

saliva-cortisol level;

b

knowledge, and perception of problematic behaviors;

c

self-compassion, attention, and subjective vitality;

d

coping strategies;

e

body self-awareness;

f

satisfaction with life;

g

psychological morbidity;

h

attitude to care.

(*)

the results show improvement, nevertheless, the authors did not conduct a hypothesis test to calculate statistical significance.

= The study has a post intervention follow-up measurement: one year post-intervention (Campos, 2019); one week after intervention (Suemoto, 2014); six months after intervention (Serrani 2012).

Table order: 1) non-RCT comparison group trials alphabetically by author last name (n=3), 2) RCTs alphabetically by author last name according to country of origin (Brazil, Cuba, Colombia, Perú, Argentina, México) (n=17).